RCT: Multi-modal Analgesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT01972620
Last Updated: 2013-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-02-28
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis:Analgesic efficacy of multi-modal analgesia is superior to standard analgesia for patients undergoing elective LapChole for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Specifically, topical cystic plate and port-site infiltrationwith0.25% bupivacaine significantly reduces pain after LapChole.
Design: Single-blinded PRCT Setting: Academic medical centers Patients and Methods: Between February and May 2010 we randomly assigned 63 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis in a 1:1 ratio to institutional standard non-opioid/opioid analgesic combinations (n=32), and institutional standard analgesia plus topical 0.25%bupivacaine spray onto the cystic plate and local 0.25% bupivacaine port-site injection,post-LapChole (n=31). Primary endpoint was patient-reported pain 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours, and 1 week post-LapCholeusing the Visual Acuity Score (VAS, 0-10).
Results: Study groups were comparable clinicopathologically. There were no study-procedure-associated adverse events. A statistically significant reduction in mean pain score was apparent in patients receiving multi-modal analgesia at all early (1-6 hours) post-operative time points and at one week following LapChole(p\<0.05).
Conclusion: This PRCT shows significantly improved pain reduction with somatovisceral pain blockade than institutional standard analgesic combinations following LapChole for symptomatic cholelithiasis. For centers not utilizing adjunctive local anesthetic for this operation, this multi-modal analgesic approach can improve patient comfort during recovery.This approach serves as the basis for a planned 4-arm PRCT designed to provide further insights into the role of local anesthetics in multi-modal operative site analgesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multi-modal analgesia
Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this arm. Standard analgesia according to institutional standard and 50:50 mixture of normal saline (8 ml) and 0.5% Bupivacaine was prepared within a 20 ml syringe (Total volume = 16 ml; Final concentration = 0.25%). Following delivery of the gallbladder specimen 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine solution was sprayed onto the cystic plate (gallbladder fossa) with a spinal needle advanced under direct laparoscopic vision via a 5mm right subcostal laparoscopic port. The anesthetic solution was sprayed at an operating distance from the cystic plate of \~ 2 cm. Following evacuation of the pneumoperitoneum, the remaining 8 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine was infiltrated subcutaneously at each of the 4 laparoscopic port sites (2 ml per port site) prior sutured closure.
Bupivacaine
A 50:50 mixture of normal saline (8 ml) and 0.5% Bupivacaine was prepared within a 20 ml syringe (Total volume 16 ml; Final concentration = 0.25%). Following delivery of the gallbladder specimen in the Multi-modal analgesia group, 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine solution was sprayed onto the cystic plate (gallbladder fossa) with a spinal needle advanced under direct laparoscopic vision via a 5mm right subcostal laparoscopic port. The anesthetic solution was sprayed at an operating distance from the cystic plate of \~ 2 cm. Following evacuation of the pneumoperitoneum, again within the Multi-modal analgesia group, the remaining 8 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine was infiltrated subcutaneously at each of the four laparoscopic port sites (2 ml per port site) prior to standard sutured closure of each incision
Control
Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this arm. They received standard analgesia according to institutional standard of practice consisted of non-narcotic analgesia with narcotic analgesic rescue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacaine
A 50:50 mixture of normal saline (8 ml) and 0.5% Bupivacaine was prepared within a 20 ml syringe (Total volume 16 ml; Final concentration = 0.25%). Following delivery of the gallbladder specimen in the Multi-modal analgesia group, 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine solution was sprayed onto the cystic plate (gallbladder fossa) with a spinal needle advanced under direct laparoscopic vision via a 5mm right subcostal laparoscopic port. The anesthetic solution was sprayed at an operating distance from the cystic plate of \~ 2 cm. Following evacuation of the pneumoperitoneum, again within the Multi-modal analgesia group, the remaining 8 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine was infiltrated subcutaneously at each of the four laparoscopic port sites (2 ml per port site) prior to standard sutured closure of each incision
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* non - pregnant women
* 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria
* patients operated on for indications other than symptomatic cholelithiasisT
* those having conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy
* those that withdrew from the study for any reason before the end of the required 7-day follow up (including those that died during that period)
* those with incomplete data.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Klinicki Centar Vojvodine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Radovan Veljkovic, M.D., Ph.D.
MD, PhD, ass. prof
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Radovan Veljkovic, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Centre of Vojvodina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinicki Centar Vojvodine
Novi Sad, Vojvodina, Serbia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Verma GR, Lyngdoh TS, Kaman L, Bala I. Placement of 0.5% bupivacaine-soaked Surgicel in the gallbladder bed is effective for pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2006 Oct;20(10):1560-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0284-5. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Boddy AP, Mehta S, Rhodes M. The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006 Sep;103(3):682-8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226268.06279.5a.
Mitra S, Khandelwal P, Roberts K, Kumar S, Vadivelu N. Pain relief in laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a review of the current options. Pain Pract. 2012 Jul;12(6):485-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00513.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
Gupta A. Local anaesthesia for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy--a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):275-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.007.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00-01/515
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id