Medial vs Lateral Approach for Total Knee Replacement on Valgus Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT01965886

Last Updated: 2015-01-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The most common surgical approach to perform a total knee replacement is called medial parapatellar approach. It's effective and can be applied virtually to all types of knee deformities. The Keblish approach is an alternative approach which uses the lateral side of the patella to enter the joint. Some orthopaedic surgeons consider the latter approach a better option when facing a valgus deformity of the osteoarthritic knee but there is no convincing evidence on the literature supporting one or another approach. The objective of this study is to compare the medial vs lateral approach for total knee replacement on valgus knee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total knee replacement is a procedure for the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis. The most common surgical approach to perform a total knee replacement is called medial parapatellar approach, or simply medial approach. It's effective and can be applied virtually to all types of knee deformities. The Keblish approach is an alternative approach which uses the lateral side of the patella to enter the joint. It's also called lateral parapatellar approach. Some orthopaedic surgeons consider the latter approach a better option when facing a valgus deformity of the osteoarthritic knee. Theoretically, the Keblish approach can promote better soft tissue balance and patellar tracking, but there is no convincing evidence on the literature supporting one or another approach for a total knee replacement on valgus knee. The objective of this prospective and randomized clinical trial is to compare the medial vs lateral approach for total knee replacement on valgus knee.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medial approach

Medial parapatellar approach (classic approach)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medial approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision medial to the patella

Keblish approach

Lateral parapatellar approach (Keblish approach)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Keblish approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision lateral to the patella

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medial approach

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision medial to the patella

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Keblish approach

Total knee replacement performed through a longitudinal incision lateral to the patella

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

medial parapatellar approach classic approach lateral approach lateral parapatellar approach

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren \& Lawrence grade 4)
* Valgus deformity of the knee
* Read and sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe pain in other joint (VAS\>6)
* Comorbidities or any condition that contraindicate the procedure
* Previous arthroplasty on the index knee
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Campinas, Brazil

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alessandro R Zorzi, MsC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Campinas

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Clínicas da UNICAMP

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gustavo C Campos, MD

Role: CONTACT

+551983318000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alessandro R Zorzi, MsC

Role: primary

+5519992809303

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VALGUSKNEE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.