Evaluation of Blood Pressure Reduction, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in Patients With Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Stable Doses of Anti-hyperglycemic and Anti-hypertensive Agents

NCT ID: NCT01939496

Last Updated: 2017-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

171 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of canagliflozin (JNJ-28431754) on blood pressure reduction, compared to placebo, in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus and who are on stable doses of anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hypertensive agents. Overall safety and tolerability of canagliflozin will be assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double blind (neither the patient nor the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), parallel-group, 3-arm (patients will be assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups) multicenter study to determine the effect of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg) on blood pressure (BP) reduction compared to placebo (a pill that looks like all the other treatments but has no real medicine) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study will consist of 3 phases: a screening phase, a double-blind treatment phase and a follow-up period. Approximately 153 participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups (in a 1:1:1 ratio) in the double-blind treatment phase to receive canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The total duration of participation in this study will be approximately 13 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 6 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) in addition to the patient's anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information.

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 6 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) in addition to the patient's anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information.

Placebo

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 6 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One matching placebo capsule orally in addition to the patient's anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Canagliflozin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) in addition to the patient's anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

One matching placebo capsule orally in addition to the patient's anti-hyperglycemic agents (AHA) regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
* patients with hypertension (seated office SBP of \>=130 mmHg and \<160 mmHg and seated office DBP of \>= 70 mmHg at screening and at Week -2
* patients on stable doses of 1 to 3 anti-hypertensive agents for at least 5 weeks before screening
* patients on stable doses of 1 to 3 oral anti-hyperglycemic agents which must include metformin, for at least 8 weeks before screening

Exclusion Criteria

* a history of diabetic ketoacidosis
* type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
* pancreas or beta-cell transplantation
* fasting C-peptide \<0.70 ng/mL (0.23 nmol/L)
* body mass index \<30 kg/m2
* has ongoing, inadequately controlled thyroid disorder
* has a history of cardio-renal disease that required treatment with immunosuppressive therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Gulf Shores, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Avondale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Perry, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rincon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mandeville, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Auburn, Maine, United States

Site Status

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Morganville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Whiting, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Carolina, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce Pr, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Trujillo Alto, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pfeifer M, Townsend RR, Davies MJ, Vijapurkar U, Ren J. Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0511-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28241822 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28431754DIA4002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR102208

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.