An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of Canagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Moderate Renal Impairment

NCT ID: NCT01064414

Last Updated: 2013-08-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

272 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have reduced kidney function.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), parallel-group, 3-arm (patients will be assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups) multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2 different doses of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg) compared to placebo (a pill that looks like all the other treatments but has no real medicine) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have renal impairment (reduced kidney function) and who are not achieving an adequate response from current therapy to control their diabetes. Canagliflozin (also referred to as JNJ-28431754) is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with T2DM. Approximately 240 patients will participate in the study for approximately 63 to 72 weeks, depending on the length of the pretreatment phase. The study will consist of a pretreatment phase, a 52 week double blind treatment phase, and a posttreatment phase. During the pretreatment phase, screening evaluations will be performed to see if patients meet the entry criteria for the study. In addition, routine clinical procedures will be performed (physical examination, vital signs measurements, and an electrocardiogram \[ECG\]), a blood and urine sample will be collected for routine clinical laboratory tests, and all antihyperglycemic therapy taken by patients will be reviewed. Patients who meet entrance criteria for the study and who currently take a stable antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) regimen according to the local prescribing information will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients who meet entrance criteria for the study but who are not taking a stable AHA regimen according to the local prescribing information will enter an AHA adjustment period that may last for up to 12 weeks. Patients will receive once daily treatment with study drug in addition to their current stable diabetes regimen (eg, diet, exercise, and medication therapy). Patients will continue to take their assigned treatment for 52 weeks (includes a 26-week core double-blind treatment period and a 26-week extension double-blind treatment period). During the study, if a patient's blood sugar remains high despite treatment with study drug in combination with their other antidiabetic agents, the study physician will modify the patient's treatment. If patients take insulin and experience low blood sugar (hypoglycemia), the dose of insulin may be modified. During the study, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from safety laboratory tests (including chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), ECGs, vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, self-monitored blood glucose, and collection of potential hypoglycemic episodes reported by patients on diary cards. The safety of patients in this study will also be monitored by a company internal Medical Safety Review Committee (MSRC). An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will evaluate cardiovascular (CV) events that are reported across the entire clinical development program for canagliflozin. Patients who complete the Week 52 visit or who discontinue treatment early and are withdrawn from the study will have end-of-study evaluations performed and a follow-up telephone interview conducted by study personnel approximately 30 days (but no more than 42 days) after the last dose of study drug to collect any serious adverse events that occurred since their last study visit. The primary outcome measures in the study are to assess the effect of canagliflozin relative to placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, a blood test used to measure the control of diabetes) after 26 weeks of treatment and to assess the safety and tolerability of canagliflozin from time of signed informed consent to study end (includes up to 30 days following the last dose of study drug). All patients will take a single-blind placebo capsule once daily for 2 weeks before randomization to double-blind study drug. After randomization, patients will take one capsule of canagliflozin (either 100 mg or 300 mg) or matching placebo orally (by mouth) with liquid once daily for 52 weeks before the first meal each day except on days when fasting or pharmacokinetic blood samples are collected in which case study drug will be taken after the visit immediately before the patient's next meal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Renal Insufficiency

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Canagliflozin JNJ 28431754 Placebo Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 hemoglobin A1c protein, Blood Glucose reduced kidney function, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Each patient will receive 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Canagliflozin 300 mg

Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canagliflozin

Intervention Type DRUG

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Placebo

Each patient will receive matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Canagliflozin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with T2DM not on an AHA or on any AHA in monotherapy or combination therapy (including oral or non oral agents)
* Patients with reduced kidney function

Exclusion Criteria

* History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy
* Have proliferative diabetic retinopathy for which treatment is planned during the course of the study
* Kidney disease that required treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, history of dialysis or kidney transplant, presence of nephrotic syndrome (eg, severe proteinuria with hypoalbuminemia and/or edema), or inflammatory kidney disease
* Receiving anti hypertensive or anti-hyperlipidemic therapy not on a stable regimen
* History of a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Concord, California, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Nampa, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canal Fulton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Reservoir, , Australia

Site Status

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Niklaas, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

La Rochelle Cedex 1 Poitou-Cha, , France

Site Status

Le Creusot, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Vénissieux, , France

Site Status

Dormagen, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Einbeck, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Kassel, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Schkeuditz, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Aurangabad, , India

Site Status

Madurai, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Ogre, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Jalan Cheras N/A, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kajang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Pulau Pinang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Culiacán, , Mexico

Site Status

Morelia, , Mexico

Site Status

Zapopan, , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Dunedin Nz, , New Zealand

Site Status

Nz, , New Zealand

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Łask, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Târgovişte, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kirov, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Parow, Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Somerset West, , South Africa

Site Status

Seognam-Si, Kyungki-Do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Ciudad Real, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

San Sebastián de los Reyes, , Spain

Site Status

Santa Cruz de Tenerife, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong United States Australia Belgium Brazil Canada France Germany India Latvia Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Poland Romania Russia South Africa South Korea Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26580237 (View on PubMed)

Weir MR, Kline I, Xie J, Edwards R, Usiskin K. Effect of canagliflozin on serum electrolytes in patients with type 2 diabetes in relation to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Sep;30(9):1759-68. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.919907. Epub 2014 May 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24786834 (View on PubMed)

Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Fung A, Mayer C, Capuano G, Ways K, Usiskin K. Genital mycotic infections with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pooled analysis of clinical studies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):1109-19. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.890925. Epub 2014 Feb 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24517339 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28431754DIA3004

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR017008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id