Pathology in the Brain After mTBI - A Multimodal MRI Study
NCT ID: NCT01936792
Last Updated: 2015-04-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-08-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is hypothesized that there will be a change in the diffusion signal measured with DKI in the thalamus (THA) and with DTI in the corpus callosum (CC), in the acute stage and at follow-up of the mTBI subjects compared with the healthy controls. Secondary it is expected that there will be changes in the diffusion signal measured with DKI and DTI in other WM and GM area in both the acute stage and at follow up with mTBI subjects compared with healthy controls. Also rs-fMRI markers are secondary expected to differ in the two groups. Moreover secondarily the MRI markers are tested for correlation with the severity of PCS acutely and at follow up after mTBI.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerebral Microstructural Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02331901
MEG and DTI of Neural Function and Connectivity in Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT01298557
Microstructural Changes in the Brain During Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02350894
Diffusion Tensor Brain MRI in the Detection of Structural Abnormality of the White Substance in Concussion
NCT06144359
Objective Concussion Assessment Using MRI and Metabolomics
NCT05993351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Commotio cerebri, also known as mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is often defined as an exogenous traumatic stimulus that causes a physiological disruption of brain function (American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine). This includes a biochemical cascade, edema, micro-haemorrhages, diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and changes in activity between internal networks in the brain (12, 13).
In severe trauma, conventional scanning methods such as Computer Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can detect bone rupture, edema and micro-haemorrhages, but in mTBI, it is often difficult to detect edema or micro-hemorrhages, and the conventional methods is often not sensitive enough to show pathology especially beyond the acute period, although patients continue to have physical symptoms as well as cognitive and emotional problems (6, 12).
More MRI techniques, which are not routinely used in the clinic, has verified both DAI and changes in cortical network as compared to healthy controls (12). One of these is the method Diffusional tensor imaging (DTI) which can be used to detect the DAI in white matter (WM). DTI studies confirm DAI in several WM areas after mTBI (12). Other studies have shown that DAI detected by DTI in several places of WM correlates with cognitive problems after mTBI (1,2,6,13).
A more recent and less studied MRI method is Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging (DKI) which can display DAI in WM and prove to be more sensitive than the DTI for the detection of damage in gray matter (GM) (3, 4). A study in humans showed significant differences between individuals with mTBI and healthy controls, in the thalamus and several WM areas (3). This study also showed a correlation between DKI markers in the thalamus and the capsula interna with cognitive problems in multiple domains after mTBI. DKI is therefore suggested to be used in addition to DTI in relation to detect tissue damage in both WM and GM.
Another MRI method that has shown promising results in relation to mTBI is resting state functional MRI (fMRI-rs). Rs-fMRI has shown differences between brain network connectivity in mTBI patients compared to healthy controls (9). A study based on the theory Default Mode Network (DMN) has also shown a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in a patient classification in the subacute phase (8).
Generally more longitudinal studies, larger publications with more participants and consensus on which areas that are associated with MRI verified pathology are still missing. Also the correlations between MRI markers with the physical, cognitive and emotional problems are still to be solved.
It is the purpose to use three research based scan methods to detect tissue damage in the brains of persons after concussion, both acute and 3 months after the accident. Moreover the correlation between MRI makers and the registered physical, cognitive and emotional symptoms after concussion are to be examined.
It is hypothesized that there will be a change in Mean Kurtosis in the thalamus, corpus callosum and hippo campus from baseline to follow-up. Secondary we examine change in Mean Diffusivity and Fractional Anisotropy in the thalamus, corpus callosum and hippo campus from baseline to follow-up and for both DKI and DTI we examine the difference between the mTBI subjects and healthy controls in the acute stage and at follow-up. Moreover we examine correlation of MRI markers the severity of PCS acutely and at follow up. Finally rs-fMRI and default mode network is expected to differ between the two groups
Materials and methods
The study design is a controlled observational trial with follow up. 35 individuals with mTBI and 35 matched healthy controls (age and sex) are examined. Persons with mTBI are scanned within the first 14 days after mTBI and at follow-up 3 months after. Controls are scanned only once.
The MRI scans will be performed on CE-approved MRI scanners at Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. A standard protocol for MRI will be used containing a structural T1, a susceptibility weighted image (SWI) and T2 FLAIR sequence with the purpose to visualize anatomy, micro hemorrhages and edema. It is expected that the findings from the standard protocol will be present in the acute stage but only for some at follow-up.
The novelty of the current study is the use of a optimized and newly developed faster DKI scan sequence, which makes it possible to use DKI in a clinical setup. In addition, to date there has not been provided a follow-up at 3 months after mTBI with DKI (9 months Grossman study).
Symptom Questionnaires:
Both at baseline and at 3 months follow-up three questionnaires are to be filled out "The Rivermead postconcussion symptom questionnaire", " The Symptom Checklist" (SCL-8AD) and The Brief Illness Perception questionnaire" (BIPQ). Control Persons will also fill out these questionnaires.
Statistical considerations:
Power calculations of the upcoming study is based upon a previous studies by Grossman et. al.(3) MK in THA at Baseline: 35 mTBI subjects (mean 0.74, sd 0.08), 35 healthy controls (mean 0.89, sd 0.04), power = 100% MK in THA at Follow up: 25 mTBI (mean 0.78, sd 0.06), 25 healthy controls (mean 0.89, sd 0.12) power = 96% An ANOVA will be used to test the difference in signal to the two times (\<14 days and 3 months after mTBI).
Additionally, there will be made paired comparison between mTBI individuals. Both primary and secondary outcomes will showed in uncorrected and Bonferroni corrected.
Regions and parameters which show significant differences, will be compared with symptom scores using Spearman rank correlation, controlled for age and sex.
Risks, side effects and disadvantages:
MRI:
All project participants will review a checklist compared with contraindications for. There is no evidence of harmful effects of MRI, if these precautions are followed. Additionally subjects are provided with earplugs to protect from the noise from the scanner.
The clinical scans will be seen by a neuroradiologist and if abnormality is suspected, pictures will be evaluated further. If the abnormality is real the subject will get an additional examine and appropriate guidance will be conducted by the involved neuroradiologist.
While the images from the research part is not primarily used for clinical use, there will not be made any clinical diagnostic evaluation from these brain scans and they are not necessarily evaluated by a person with clinical radiological competence.
Research Ethics statement:
The techniques used are non-invasive and does not include methods like intravascular catheters, injection of contrast agents or any medication. There is no radiation danger, and the studies are not associated with significant side effects, risks or disadvantages for the participants.
The project involves only competent subjects participating voluntarily after adequate verbal and written information and written consent. The participation may at any time leave the study and the investigation without having to justify it. The study itself does not involve treatment and if the subject withdraws his agreement, this does not affect his right to present or future treatment
Recruitment:
People with concussions will be recruited from the Department of Radiology at Aarhus University Hospital. Controls are recruited in the recruitment system Sona Systems and by posters with contact information.
Notification to the Data Protection Agency:
The project is registered to the data inspectorate in Region Midtjylland's of "Health Scientific research in Central Denmark Region". Personal information will be kept confidential and will be destroyed after the study is completed. The project is progressing in accordance with the Act on Processing of Personal Data (http://www.datatilsynet.dk/borger/forskningsprojekter/).
Publication of results:
Publication of results from the project will be coordinated by the Project Manager in accordance with the guidelines specified in the "Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice" (Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, 1998).
Positive as well as negative, and results that can not be concluded on, will be published in international scientific journals.
Financial support:
The project is initiated by the Hospital of Hammel Neuro Center. There is no sponsorship or secondary economic interests involved in the project.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
mild traumatic brain injury
Subjects with mild traumatic brain injury
No interventions assigned to this group
Controls
Controls with no premorbid health conditions
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* negative CT scan
* A Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score that is higher than 13 after 30 minutes
* one or more of the following characteristics:
* A period of loss of consciousness for up to 30 minutes
* A period of amnesia of events immediately before or after the accident within 24 hours before / after the episode
* Any change in mental state at the time of the accident (eg, dazed, disoriented or confused)
* Focal neurological deficit, which may or may not be transient
Exclusion Criteria
* The use of drugs, smoking or alcohol eight hours before MRI
* Alcohol or drug abuse
* Former mTBI with unconsciousness within the last 2 years
* Significant other trauma, as the primary symptom
* MRI contraindications
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Erhard Trillingsgaard Næss-Schmidt
Pathology in the brain after mTBI - A multimodal MRI study
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jørgen F Nielsen, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Region Hospital, Hammel Neurocenter, University Clinic, Voldbyvej 15, 8450 Hammel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Region Hospital Hammel Neurocenter
Hammel, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aoki Y, Inokuchi R, Gunshin M, Yahagi N, Suwa H. Diffusion tensor imaging studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;83(9):870-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302742. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
Beauchamp MH, Ditchfield M, Babl FE, Kean M, Catroppa C, Yeates KO, Anderson V. Detecting traumatic brain lesions in children: CT versus MRI versus susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jun;28(6):915-27. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1712. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
Grossman EJ, Ge Y, Jensen JH, Babb JS, Miles L, Reaume J, Silver JM, Grossman RI, Inglese M. Thalamus and cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusional kurtosis imaging study. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Sep;29(13):2318-27. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1763. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
Grossman EJ, Jensen JH, Babb JS, Chen Q, Tabesh A, Fieremans E, Xia D, Inglese M, Grossman RI. Cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal diffusional kurtosis and perfusion imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 May;34(5):951-7, S1-3. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3358. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
Iverson GL. Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005 May;18(3):301-17. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000165601.29047.ae.
Jeter CB, Hergenroeder GW, Hylin MJ, Redell JB, Moore AN, Dash PK. Biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury/concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Apr 15;30(8):657-70. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2439.
Lovden M, Bodammer NC, Kuhn S, Kaufmann J, Schutze H, Tempelmann C, Heinze HJ, Duzel E, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Experience-dependent plasticity of white-matter microstructure extends into old age. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3878-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.026. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Mayer AR, Mannell MV, Ling J, Gasparovic C, Yeo RA. Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Nov;32(11):1825-35. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21151. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
McDonald BC, Saykin AJ, McAllister TW. Functional MRI of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): progress and perspectives from the first decade of studies. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Jun;6(2):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9173-4.
Messe A, Caplain S, Paradot G, Garrigue D, Mineo JF, Soto Ares G, Ducreux D, Vignaud F, Rozec G, Desal H, Pelegrini-Issac M, Montreuil M, Benali H, Lehericy S. Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter lesions at the subacute stage in mild traumatic brain injury with persistent neurobehavioral impairment. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jun;32(6):999-1011. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21092. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
PALLESEN, H. and TRIER, M., eds, 2006. Inde i varmen eller ude på et sidespor. En redegørrelse om unge med erhvervet hjerneskade og deres særlige problemstillinger. First edn. Denmark: Videnscenter for Hjerneskade.
Toledo E, Lebel A, Becerra L, Minster A, Linnman C, Maleki N, Dodick DW, Borsook D. The young brain and concussion: imaging as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jul;36(6):1510-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
Vagnozzi R, Signoretti S, Cristofori L, Alessandrini F, Floris R, Isgro E, Ria A, Marziali S, Zoccatelli G, Tavazzi B, Del Bolgia F, Sorge R, Broglio SP, McIntosh TK, Lazzarino G. Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3232-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq200. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
Voelbel GT, Genova HM, Chiaravalotti ND, Hoptman MJ. Diffusion tensor imaging of traumatic brain injury review: implications for neurorehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31(3):281-93. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0796.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-10-72-135-13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.