Advanced MRI In Acute Military TBI

NCT ID: NCT01313130

Last Updated: 2014-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traumatic brain injury can cause permanent problems with thinking, memory, control of emotions, organization and planning. Thousands of soldiers, marines, and other military personnel have had injuries to the brain due the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Very large numbers of civilians, up to perhaps 1.5 million people per year, in the United States also have traumatic brain injuries caused by car accidents, falls, sports-related injuries or assault.

We don't know very much about traumatic brain injuries right now, but there are some important new advances in technology that may help us learn a lot more about these injuries. One such advance involves new types of MRI scans that we think will be able to show what has happened to the brain after trauma more clearly that regular scans can. The first new scan is called diffusion tensor imaging, which shows injury to the axons (the wiring of the brain). The second new scan is called resting-state functional MRI correlation analysis, which shows how well various parts of the brain are connected to each other. Importantly, the new types of scans can be done using regular scanners that we already have in every major hospital. The innovation is entirely in how the scanners are used and how the resulting pictures are analyzed on a computer after they have been taken. We have already tested these scans on some military and civilian patients with brain injury and found them to be very helpful so far. Our overall goal is to see whether these new MRI scans will be useful for active duty military personnel who have had recent traumatic brain injuries. The most important goal will be to see if the amount of injury shown on the scans be used to predict how well the patients will do overall over the next 6-12 months. A related goal will be to see whether injuries to specific parts of the brain seen by these new scans can be used to predict whether patients will be likely to have specific problems like memory loss, attention deficit, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder. We would also like to see whether the scans could be even more useful when combined with information about genetic factors (inherited from the parents) that can be tested in the blood. Another important goal is to compare the effects of traumatic brain injuries caused by blasts or explosions with injuries from other causes, to find out what is unique about blast injury. A final goal will be to repeat the scans 6-12 months later to see whether the new MRI scans can show whether the injuries to the brain have healed, gotten worse, or stayed the same. These new scans could help with decisions about whether military personnel can return to duty, what sort of rehabilitation and treatment would benefit them most, and what family members should watch for and expect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

traumatic brain injury post traumatic stress disorder Diffusion tensor imaging resting state functional connectivity genetic factors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

non-blast-related TBI

100 active duty US military personnel identified clinically as having suffered non-blast-related TBI. TBI caused by other mechanisms such as motor vehicle crashes, falls, struck by blunt objects etc.

No interventions assigned to this group

other blast-related injuries

100 active duty US military personnel with blast-exposure and other blast-related injuries but no clinical evidence of TBI

No interventions assigned to this group

other non-blast injuries

100 active duty US military personnel with other non-blast injuries and no clinical evidence of TBI

No interventions assigned to this group

blast-related TBI

100 active duty US military personnel identified clinically as having suffered blast-related TBI

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of blast-related TBI of any severity, as made by the LRMC TBI screening team, based on clinical history, examination, and/or clinical imaging performed as part of standard care (CT, conventional MRI). This includes participants with both primary blast and additional mechanisms of injury ("blast-plus" injury)
2. Acute injury or injuries, defined as first occurring 0-30 days prior to enrollment.
3. Ability to provide informed consent.
4. Ability to lie still in a supine position for the duration of the scan sessions, e.g. no severe claustrophobia or limiting pain from other injuries.

Exclusion Criteria

5. known metallic implants or metallic foreign objects.
6. known to be HIV positive
7. known to be pregnant
8. previous major traumatic brain injury
9. contraindication to MRI for medical reasons such as arrhythmias
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Brody, MD, PhD

Associate Professor of Neurology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

Landstuhl, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mac Donald CL, Johnson AM, Wierzechowski L, Kassner E, Stewart T, Nelson EC, Werner NJ, Zonies D, Oh J, Fang R, Brody DL. Prospectively assessed clinical outcomes in concussive blast vs nonblast traumatic brain injury among evacuated US military personnel. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Aug;71(8):994-1002. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1114.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24934200 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PT090444

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id