Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-08-01
2016-10-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\- Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a brain disease caused in part by head injury. The brain changes from CTE can only be seen at autopsy. Researchers want to test a new brain scan to help diagnose CTE in living patients.
Objective:
\- To determine if a new type of brain scan can detect changes that occur in chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
Eligibility:
\- Adults age 18 60 with previous head injury or participation in certain sports.
Design:
* Participants will be screened with:
* Physical exam
* Blood and urine tests
* Tests of thinking, mood, and memory
* 30-minute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain scan. A magnetic field and radio waves take pictures of the brain. Participants will lie on a table that slides into a metal cylinder. They will get earplugs for the loud knocking sounds.
* Visit 1: Participants will have a 70-minute PET scan of the brain with a small amount of a radioactive chemical. That will be injected through an intravenous tube (catheter) in each arm. A catheter will also be put into an artery at the wrist or elbow.
* Participants will lie on a bed that slides in and out of a donut-shaped scanner. A plastic mask may be molded to their face and head. Vital signs and heart activity will be checked before and during the scan.
* Blood and urine will be taken before and after the scan.
* Participants will be checked on by phone the next day.
* Visit 2: Participants will repeat Visit 1 with a different chemical and no artery catheter.
* Visit 3: Participants may have a spinal tap. Some fluid will be removed by needle between the bones in the back.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
NCT02003183
PET-MRI in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury (CTBI)
NCT03241732
The DIAGNOSE-CTE Research Project
NCT02798185
FDDNP Protocol for Visualizing Brain Proteinopathies to Assist in the Diagnosis of Persons With Suspected CTE and AD
NCT04311281
Tau Imaging of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
NCT02191267
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study population: The proposed study will include 40 subjects. Twenty will be patients with history of TBI and suspected CTE and 20 will be healthy cognitively normal volunteers without history of TBI.
Design: Subjects will undergo medical screening and have brain MRI and neuropsychological testing performed. Subjects will undergo one brain PET scan with \[11C\]PBB3 to detect aggregates of tau protein. Subjects will also have one brain PET scan with \[11C\]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) to detect amyloid plaques. Subjects will be asked to have a lumbar puncture to measure CSF tau concentrations.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure will be the amount of \[11C\]PBB3 binding in the brain. We will quantify the radioligand s brain uptake, washout, plasma clearance, and distribution volume using compartmental modeling. Distribution volume of \[11C\]PBB3 is proportional to the density of insoluble paired helical filaments of tau and is equal to the ratio at equilibrium of uptake in brain to the concentration of parent radiotracer in plasma. As an exploratory measure, we will determine if there is a relationship between \[11C\]PBB3 binding in brain and gray matter loss on MRI. We will also measure the amount of \[11C\]PIB binding in the brain using the Logan reference tissue method with cerebellum as reference.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* For patients:
* History of head injury resulting from past or current participation in one or more contact sports (hockey, football, or boxing). Patients may have history of structural brain injury (i.e., injury accompanying abnormality on MRI or CT scan), concussion without structural injury (mild TBI), or repetitive sub-concussive injury.
* Meets DMS-V criteria for Major Neurocognitive Disorder or Mild Neurocognitive Disorder
* Age 18 to 60 years.
* Ambulatory.
* Patients unable to provide informed consent must have a surrogate decision maker.
* For healthy controls:
* Healthy without past or present history of brain disease.
* Age 18 to 60 years.
* Able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* For patients: Subjects with abnormal brain imaging findings that suggest a diagnosis other than TBI or a second lesion such as brain tumor in addition to the changes consistent with TBI.
* For controls: past or present history of either a single concussion or more severe TBI, or of repetitive sub-concussive injury due to contact sport participation.
* Serious medical conditions, which make study procedures of the current study unsafe. Such serious medical conditions include uncontrolled epilepsy and multiple serious injuries. The Principal Investigator of this protocol will determine whether the subject needs to be excluded.
* The DSM-V criteria for Major Neurocognitive Disorder are as follows:
--Evidence of significant cognitive decline from a previous level of performance in one or more cognitive domains (complex attention, executive function, learning and memory, perceptual-motor, or social cognition) based on:
* Concern of the individual, a knowledgeable informant, of the clinician that there has been a significant decline in cognitive function.
* A substantial impairment in cognitive performance, preferably documented by standardized neuropsychological testing, or, in its absence, another qualified clinical assessment.
* The cognitive deficits interfere with independence in everyday activities (i.e. at a minimum, requiring assistance with complex instrumental activities of daily living such as paying bills or managing medications)
* The cognitive deficits do not occur exclusively in the context of delirium.
* The cognitive disorder is not better explained by another mental disorder (e.g. major depressive disorder, schizophrenia).
* Criteria for Mild Neurocognitive Disorder are as follows:
* There is evidence of modest cognitive decline from a previous level of performance in one or more of the domains outlined above based on:
* Concern of the individual, a knowledgeable informant, or the clinician.
* Decline in neurocognitive performance, preferably documented by standardized neuropsychological testing, or, in its absence, another qualified clinical assessment.
* The cognitive deficits are insufficient to interfere with independence (eg, instrumental activities of daily living, like more complex tasks such as paying bills or managing medications,
are preserved), but greater effort, compensatory strategies, or accommodation may be required to maintain independence.
* The cognitive deficits do not occur exclusively in the context of a delirium.
* The cognitive deficits are not primarily attributable to another mental disorder (eg, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia).
There are no restrictions on medications. Since disease modifying therapy for tauopathies (including CTE and Alzheimer s disease) do not currently exist, no currently available medications, either prescribed or over-the-counter, are expected to confound the results of this study. Anti-inflammatory medications, including NSAIDs, are not expected to significantly reduce tau aggregation in CTE patients, based on the failure of these medications to prevent disease progression in Alzheimer s disease.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert B Innis, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Baugh CM, Stamm JM, Riley DO, Gavett BE, Shenton ME, Lin A, Nowinski CJ, Cantu RC, McKee AC, Stern RA. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: neurodegeneration following repetitive concussive and subconcussive brain trauma. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Jun;6(2):244-54. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9164-5.
Braskie MN, Klunder AD, Hayashi KM, Protas H, Kepe V, Miller KJ, Huang SC, Barrio JR, Ercoli LM, Siddarth P, Satyamurthy N, Liu J, Toga AW, Bookheimer SY, Small GW, Thompson PM. Plaque and tangle imaging and cognition in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Oct;31(10):1669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, Walsh JC, Mu F, Su MY, Shankle WR, Elizarov A, Kolb HC. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34(2):457-68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-M-0164
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
140164
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.