Validity of Digital Models Obtained With iTero® and Lava Digital® in Comparison With Plaster Models.
NCT ID: NCT01934517
Last Updated: 2016-02-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-08-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Dental Impression Methods for Children
NCT06422611
The Effectiveness of iTero Element 5D NIRI System in Early Proximal Caries Detection in Permanent Teeth
NCT06276959
Intraoral Impressions for Assessment of Wear of Teeth and Restorative Materials.
NCT03624894
A Study to Compare Caries Detection in the Pediatric Population Between the iTero Element 5D System and Bitewing Radiographs
NCT05792631
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models Obtained Using Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners
NCT03103802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary objective is to compare two different impression materials (i.e. alginate and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS)) and determine whether the impression material used affects the accuracy of the measurements.
Statistical analysis:
* Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) will be used to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator reliability of the measurements for each method, i.e. the plaster models and the digital models.
* A paired t-test will be used to determine the validity of the digital measurements with iTero®, and to compare the impression materials (alginate and PVS).
* A Bland-Altman plot will also be used to compare the two digital methods (Lava Digital® et iTero®) with the plaster models.
* Dahlberg coefficient will be used to evaluate the technical error associated with the measurements that will be made.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* complete permanent dentition from first molar to the other first molar
* no interproximal modifications (e.g. decay, large restorations, abnormal tooth morphology) which could affect the mesio-distal width of the teeth
Exclusion Criteria
12 Years
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Université de Montréal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Normand Bach
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vincent-Claude Peloquin, resident
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Montreal, department of Orthodontics
Normand Bach, D.M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.D.(c)
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Université de Montréal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Montreal, Faculty of Orthodontics
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VCP2013udem
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.