3D-printed Ceromer Crowns Versus Stainless Steel in Posterior Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT07091331

Last Updated: 2025-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-30

Study Completion Date

2026-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare preformed metal crowns and 3D-printed ceromer crowns in primary molars of 4-9 years old children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* How does 3D-printed ceromer crowns compare clincally to stainless steel crowns when restoring posterior molars?
* What is the level of satisfaction of the patient with both materials?
* What is the level of parental satisfaction with both materials?

Study methodology:

This study is a split-mouth clinical trial where participants will receive at least one of each materials in different quadrants of the mouth.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized clinical trial is designed following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and will adopt a prospective, split-mouth approach. The objective is to compare the clinical performance of crowns fabricated with three-dimensional (3D) printed ceromer material against conventional preformed stainless steel crowns in extensively decayed primary posterior teeth. The unit of observation will be gingival inflammation in the area surrounding the restorations, evaluated at specific time points over a 12-month follow-up period (3, 6 and 12 months).

Each eligible participant will receive both types of crowns, with assignments made to contralateral quadrants of the mouth to allow for within-subject comparison. This methodology minimizes inter-individual variability and strengthens internal validity. The ceromer crowns will be fabricated via additive manufacturing (3D printing), while the stainless steel crowns will follow the conventional selection and crimping technique.

Written informed consent will be obtained from their guardians or parents. An expected total of 50 primary molars of healthy participants will be restored.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries, Dental Caries; Dentin Dental Caries in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Due to the esthetic nature of the different materials, masking of the participants and investigators is not possible, however outcomes assessor with be masked.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D-printed ceromer crown

Group A: 3D-printed ceromer crown (Sculpture, Rodin Resins, La Brea, CA, USA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized 3D-printed pediatric ceromer crown

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After primary molar crown preparation, digital impression using intraoral scanner (i700, Medit, Seoul, South Korea), crown will be designed with CAD software (CliniCAD, medit, South Korea) and fabricated using a 3D printer, (Sonic mini 4k, Phrozen, Taipei, Taiwan). Crown will be cemented by passive seating using a self-adhesive dual cure cement (Beauticem, shofu, San Marcos, CA, USA)

Stainless steel crown

Group B: Stainless steel crown (3M Espe, Saint Paul, MN, USA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prefabricated stainless steel crown group

Intervention Type DEVICE

Stainless steel crown application: After preparation of the tooth, the crown will be filled and cemented with type-1 glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem easymix, 3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized 3D-printed pediatric ceromer crown

After primary molar crown preparation, digital impression using intraoral scanner (i700, Medit, Seoul, South Korea), crown will be designed with CAD software (CliniCAD, medit, South Korea) and fabricated using a 3D printer, (Sonic mini 4k, Phrozen, Taipei, Taiwan). Crown will be cemented by passive seating using a self-adhesive dual cure cement (Beauticem, shofu, San Marcos, CA, USA)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prefabricated stainless steel crown group

Stainless steel crown application: After preparation of the tooth, the crown will be filled and cemented with type-1 glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem easymix, 3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 4 to 9 years with at least 2 primary molars affected by deep occlusoproximal caries.
* Teeth may require pulp therapy (pulpotomy or pulpectomy) and be suitable for full-coverage restoration.
* Teeth must have an antagonist and be located in opposing hemiarches.
* The affected primary molars must be expected to remain in the mouth for at least 12 months.
* The child must be in general good health.
* Parents or legal guardians must sign informed consent, and the child must provide assent.
* Patient does not come to control appointment or does not want to continue research.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with systemic diseases or medical conditions affecting oral health.
* Uncooperative behavior (Frankl scale 3 or 4).
* Temporomandibular joint disorders or parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism).
* Absence of antagonist or adjacent teeth in the selected quadrants.
* Children on long-term medication.
* Patient with allergy to local anesthetic, nickel or chromium.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alan Velazquez

D.D.S., M.P.H.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alan Velazquez, DDS, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Autonoma de Baja California

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Facultad de Odontología

Tijuana, Estado de Baja California, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alan Velazquez, DDS, MPH

Role: CONTACT

+526644622237

Sibelli Olivieri, DDS, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+5543999750266

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patricia Preciado, DDS, MPH

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2735

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.