A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Standardize Attending Morning Rounds in Medicine
NCT ID: NCT01931553
Last Updated: 2015-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this quality improvement (QI) initiative is to evaluate the adherence to and impact of implementing standardized attending morning rounds on medicine teams at our institution. A standardized rounding intervention has been developed which includes specific guidance on completing the following activities during morning rounds: (1) Pre-rounds discretion; (2) Pre-rounds huddle; (3) Bedside registered nurse (RN) integration; (4) Patient-centered rounding; (5) Real-time order writing.
This trial will randomize half of the investigators' medicine teams at University of California San Francisco to this rounding intervention whilst the other half will be randomized to continue with usual unstandardized rounding practices.
The investigators will compare medicine teams randomized to undertake standardized rounding to those teams undertaking usual practice. Outcomes assessed will relate to the patient (e.g. satisfaction), providers (e.g. satisfaction), efficiency (e.g. total morning round time) as well as adherence to the intervention .
The investigators' study hypotheses are that patient satisfaction scores will be higher for those patients receiving standardized bedside rounds compared to the usual care group. The investigators also hypothesize that total attending morning rounds time and interns length of workday will be shorter and that the number of consultations ordered before noon will increase for those teams undertaking standardized bedside. Further, the investigator hypothesize higher levels of nurse participation, physician and medical student satisfaction with standardized bedside rounding.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physician Awareness of Patients' Preferred Level of Involvement in Decision Making
NCT05314959
Evaluating a Physician Opinion Leader Intervention to Increase Utilization of Coaching/Therapy During Residency
NCT05499468
Improving Shared-Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit Using Patient-reported Outcome Information
NCT05155150
Impact of Video Presentations on Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Mental Illness
NCT03231761
Add-on Video-based Training on Mental Status Examination Skills
NCT05795387
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standardized attending morning rounds
1. Pre-rounds discretion
2. Pre-rounds huddle
3. Bedside RN integration
4. Patient-centered rounding
5. Real-time order writing
Standardized attending morning rounds
Usual rounding practice
Usual rounding practice (as defined by each clinical team)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standardized attending morning rounds
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients admitted to Medicine teams A through H
* All nurses on the Medicine floors
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brad Monash, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Nader Najafi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
James D Harrison, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Monash B, Najafi N, Mourad M, Rajkomar A, Ranji SR, Fang MC, Glass M, Milev D, Ding Y, Shen A, Sharpe BA, Harrison JD. Standardized Attending Rounds to Improve the Patient Experience: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):143-149. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2694.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RoundingUCSF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.