Comparison Between Treatment With Yellow Micropulse Laser and Green Conventional Laser in Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT01928654

Last Updated: 2014-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Macular edema is the most important cause of visual impairment in diabetic patients. Intravitreal injections of antiVEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) agents and laser treatment are two effective therapies for stabilising visual acuity. However, antiVEGF therapy is very expensive and potentially needs to to be repeated for all patients life. Laser treatment, according to modified ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study), produces retinal burns with possible negative consequences such as alterations in the visual fields.

With micropulse treatment modality laser energy is delivered in short pulses ("micropulses") rather than as a continuous wave. In this way the amount of energy delivered to the retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is significantly reduced. This finer control of the photothermal effects should avoid any retinal and RPE damage. At the same time, according to several published reports, the efficacy of treatment appears to be equivalent to conventional laser therapy.

Previous studies investigated the effects of 810nm micropulse laser therapy. Recently, this treatment modality has been made available also with 577nm wavelength, which corresponds to the maximum absorption level for blood. Aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 577nm micropulse laser treatment compared to conventional modified ETDRS laser therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Micropulse laser treatment

Sub-threshold laser treatment covering the area of retinal thickening with a dense pattern

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micropulse laser treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device for subthreshold treatment of the retina, by decomposing a continuos wave of laser in micropulses, with 5% duty cycle, 200 milliseconds, 100 microns, and power adjusted according to patient's diopter transparency and pigmentation.

Laser modified ETDRS

Macular treatment using the modified ETDRS protocol, with barely visible laser burns to close microaneurysms, or with a grid pattern in the area of retinal thickening.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laser modified ETDRS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device for visible treatment of the retina, with direct treatment of microaneurysms or grid pattern covering the area of retinal edema.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micropulse laser treatment

Device for subthreshold treatment of the retina, by decomposing a continuos wave of laser in micropulses, with 5% duty cycle, 200 milliseconds, 100 microns, and power adjusted according to patient's diopter transparency and pigmentation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Laser modified ETDRS

Device for visible treatment of the retina, with direct treatment of microaneurysms or grid pattern covering the area of retinal edema.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* written informed consent prior to study entry
* male or female patients \>= 18 years of age
* patients with diagnosis of diabetes type 1 or 2 and clinically significant macular edema
* visual impairment due to clinically significant diabetic macular edema
* best-corrected visual acuity included between 21 and 74 ETDRS letters
* central retinal thickness greater than 320 micron (Spectralis SD-OCT, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany)
* leakage and/or micro aneurysm in fluorescein angiography images within the area of retinal thickening
* HbA1C ≤10% with well-controlled blood pressure and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Luigi Sacco University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giovanni Staurenghi

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eye Clinic - Luigi Sacco University Hospital

Milan, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrea Giani, MD

Role: CONTACT

+39023904 ext. 2901

Antonio Caimi, MD

Role: CONTACT

+39023904 ext. 2441

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrea Giani, MD

Role: primary

+39023904 ext. 2901

Antonio Caimi, MD

Role: backup

+39023904 ext. 2441

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Lasercomparison

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.