Evaluation of the Effects of Selective Photocoagulation for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT01355692

Last Updated: 2016-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The population of people suffering from diabetes is rapidly increasing, from an estimated 110 million in 1994 to 221 million in 2010. Diabetic macular edema is the most common reason for reduction in visual acuity in diabetic patients.

The standard care for diabetic macular edema is focal and /or grid retinal photocoagulation. During photocoagulation, small laser burns are applied to the retina, the sensory tissue that lines the back of the eye. Studies have shown that photocoagulation of clinically significant diabetic macular edema substantially reduces the risk of visual loss, increase the chance of visual improvement and decrease the frequency of persistent macular edema. However, it remains unknown whether the destruction of sensory layer of the retina during photocoagulation that may cause visual field defects is necessary for successful treatment or is just an unwanted and unnecessary side effect.

Based on these concept, a photocoagulation technique was developed to treat the retina selectively (SRT - Selective retinal therapy), with minimal or no damage to the sensory layers. While the treatment is very similar to regular photocoagulation, the SRT laser uses much lower energy and very short pulses. As a result, treatment does not result in visible burns to the retina and previous studies have shown that the sensory layer remains intact.

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of SRT on the resolution of the edema.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laser therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nd: YLF laser treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

grid selective retinal treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nd: YLF laser treatment

grid selective retinal treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SRT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Best corrected ETDRS visual acuity letter score \>=24 (app. 20/320 or better)
2. Definite retinal thickness due to diabetic macular edema by on clinical exam at or within 500 to 3000 microns of the macular center (radius) for which the investigator believes laser photocoagulation is not indicated
3. A thickness equal or less than 315 microns in the central subfield (confirmed by SD-OCT).
4. A thickness of \>2 SD of norm in one or more inner or outer subfields on SD-OCT.
5. Maximal focal/grid laser not yet applied (within areas of thickening between 500 and 3000 microns from center of macula, not all microaneurysms treated with direct laser and not all other areas of thickening treated with grid laser). Maximal or complete laser treatment is defined as direct treatment to all microaneurysms within areas of edema and grid treatment to all other areas of macular edema.
6. No panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within prior 4 months.
7. No recent medical treatment for DME (e.g., intravitreal/peribulbar steroids within past 4 months or intravitreal anti-VEGF injection within past 2 months).
8. No major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, any other intraocular surgery, scleral buckle, glaucoma filter, cornea transplant, etc.) within prior 6 months.
9. No Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy within prior 2 months.
10. Macular edema is not considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema

o An eye should not be considered eligible (1) if the macular edema is considered to be related to cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or SD-OCT suggests that vitreoretinal interface disease (eg. vitreoretinal traction or epiretinal membrane) is the primary cause of the macular edema.
11. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photos.
12. No ocular condition (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the first 12 months of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome).

* Glaucoma per se is not an exclusion

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant
2. Condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control)
3. Patients in poor glycemic control who recently (\>3 months) initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 3 months should not be enrolled.
4. A patient with only one functioning eye (i.e., letter score 0 in contra-lateral eye)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lumenis Be Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anat Loewenstein, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Joseph Moisseiev, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sheba Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Sheba Medical Center

Tel Hahsomer, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LUM.NOVUS SRT.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.