Improving Life Chances of Disadvantaged Youth: Testing Best-Practice Academic vs. Non-Academic Supports

NCT01927523 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 5344

Last updated 2017-07-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the most cost-effective way to improve the long-term life outcomes of disadvantaged youth, by comparing best practice academic supports to best-practice non-academic supports, and learning more about whether investing in both simultaneously has synergistic (more than additive) effects.

Conditions

  • Youth Violence
  • Crime
  • Educational Achievement

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

BAM

BAM (Becoming a Man), a cognitive-behavioral group therapy intervention.

OTHER

Match

An intensive math tutoring program.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • MacArthur Foundation

    collaborator OTHER
  • U.S. Department of Justice

    collaborator FED
  • Crown Family Philanthropies

    collaborator OTHER
  • Edna McConnell Clark Foundation

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Youth Guidance

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Match Education

    collaborator OTHER
  • Chicago Public Schools

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Chicago

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jens Ludwig, PhD · University of Chicago

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-08-31
Primary Completion
2018-06-30
Completion
2018-06-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

Related Clinical Trials

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01927523 on ClinicalTrials.gov