Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2017-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study proposes to implant up to 10 young children (\<5 yrs. of age) with the Nucleus 24 Multichannel ABI (Sydney, AUS) in an attempt to demonstrate safety of the surgical procedure, tolerance of device stimulation, and the potential for auditory benefit beyond that experienced with their CI. This study will provide the preliminary experience for a larger scale clinical trial.
Aim 1: Demonstrate the safety of ABI surgery in children. Aim 2: Demonstrate the development of sound awareness and improved speech understanding among children implanted with the ABI when compared to their baseline skills. Aim 3: Demonstrate the development of oral language skills following the use of the ABI that were not evident prior to its use.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Safety Study of the Auditory Brainstem Implant for Pediatric Profoundly Deaf Patients
NCT02102256
Safety and Efficacy of the Cochlear Nucleus CI422 Cochlear Implant in Adults
NCT01867008
Safety of Autologous Human Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Fraction to Treat Acquired Hearing Loss in Children
NCT01343394
Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss/Single-sided Deafness
NCT05318417
Iowa/Nucleus 10/10 mm and Nucleus Freedom Feasibility Study
NCT00594061
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Auditory Brainstem Implant
single-arm study of auditory brainstem implantation in children
Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Children
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Children
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* MRI +/- CT evidence of one of the following: Cochlear nerve deficiency, Cochlear aplasia or severe hypoplasia, Severe inner ear malformation, Post-meningitis ossification
* When a cochlea is present or patent, lack of significant benefit from CI despite consistent use (\>6 mo.)
* Post-linguistic hearing loss (\<18 yrs. of age) with both:
* Loss or lack of benefit from appropriate CI without the possibility for revision or contralateral implantation. Examples might include: Post-meningitis ossification, Bilateral temporal bone fractures with cochlear nerve avulsion, Failed revision CI without benefit
* Previously developed open set speech perception and auditory-oral language skills
* No medical contraindications
* Willing to receive the appropriate meningitis vaccinations
* No or limited cognitive/developmental delays which would be expected to interfere with the child's ability to cooperate in testing and/or programming of the device, in developing speech and oral language, or which would make an implant and subsequent emphasis on aural/oral communication not in the child's best interest
* Strong family support including language proficiency of the parent(s) in the child's primary mode of communication as well as written and spoken English.
* Reasonable expectations from parents including a thorough understanding:
* of potential benefits and limitations of ABI
* of parental role in rehabilitation
* that the child may not develop spoken language as a primary communication mode or even sufficient spoken language to make significant academic progress in an aural/oral environment
* Involvement in an educational program that emphasizes development of auditory skills with or without the use of supplementary visual communication.
* Able to comply with study requirements including travel to investigation sites.
* Informed consent for the procedure from the child's parents/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria
* MRI evidence of one of the following:
* normal cochlea and cochlear nerves or NFII
* brainstem or cortical anomaly that makes implantation unfeasible
* Clear surgical reason for poor CI performance that can be remediated with revision CI or contralateral surgery rather than ABI.
* Intractable seizures or progressive, deteriorating neurological disorder
* Unable to participate in behavioral testing and mapping with their CI. If this appears to be an age effect, ABI will be delayed until we can be assured that the child will be able to participate, as reliable objective measures of mapping are currently not available for mapping these devices.
* Lack of potential for spoken language development. This will be considered the case when evidence of the following exist:
* Severe psychomotor retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, or developmental delays beyond speech that would preclude usage of the device and oral educational development. Autism is a special case where there is the potential for delayed presentation. When early signs are considered present, our group routinely requests a comprehensive developmental assessment for further evaluation prior to considering routine evaluation. A specialized group is readily available at our institution for such an evaluation.
* Unable to tolerate general anesthesia (cardiac, pulmonary, bleeding diathesis, etc.).
* Need for brainstem irradiation
* Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject/family regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device.
* Unwilling to sign the informed consent.
* Unwilling to make necessary follow-up appointments.
18 Months
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig A Buchman, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-0664
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.