Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-07
2030-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Are cochlear implants an effective treatment of single-sided deafness in infants and toddlers?
* Are cochlear implants a safe treatment for single-sided deafness in infants and toddlers?
Participants will receive a cochlear implant and be followed until they are five years old. During those five years, the investigators will program the device and monitor auditory development.
Children will be asked to:
* Undergo cochlear implantation
* Wear their cochlear implant processor whenever they are awake.
* Participate in traditional hearing tests
* Participate in traditional hearing testing
* Participate in localization testing
* Participate in hearing in noise testing
* Participate in word recognition testing
* Participate in speech, language, and educational evaluations
The researchers will compare results to children with typical hearing in both ears and children with single-sided deafness who have not received an implant to observe any differences between the groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Single-Sided Deafness
NCT02203305
Expanded Indications in the MED-EL Pediatric Cochlear Implant Population
NCT03900897
Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss/Single-sided Deafness
NCT05318417
Cochlear Implantation in Children With Asymmetric Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness Clinical Trial
NCT04793412
Implantation of the Cochlear® Nucleus® System in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness
NCT01670006
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Twenty (20) infants and Toddlers with SSD who are under the age of three will receive a cochlear implant. They will be followed until they reach the age of five. A group of typically hearing five-year-olds (n=20) and a group of five-year-olds with congenital or early onset SSD who have not received a cochlear implant (n=20) will also be recruited. All three groups of five-year-olds will be tested on measures of hearing in quiet, localizing, and hearing in spatially separated noise for comparison. Scores from the study group and the SSD control group will be compared to evaluate effectiveness.
The study will also explore the potential effects of SSD and early implantation on language, sensory processing, executive function, fatigue, and cognition.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Group
This group of children with single-sided deafness will receive a cochlear implant.
Cochlear Implant
A cochlear implant is a surgically implanted device that provides access to sound in people cannot get enough access to sound for communication with traditional hearing aids.
Typical Hearing Control Group (THCG)
This group of five-year-old children will have typical hearing in both ears.
No interventions assigned to this group
Single-Sided Deafness Control Group (SSDCG)
This group of five-year-old children will have single-sided deafness and no cochlear implant.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cochlear Implant
A cochlear implant is a surgically implanted device that provides access to sound in people cannot get enough access to sound for communication with traditional hearing aids.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, congenital or acquired prior to the age of 2 years, defined as:
1. Unaided residual hearing thresholds that yield a 3 frequency pure tone average (PTA; average at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) of ≥70 dB hearing loss (HL) in the ear to be implanted
2. Hearing thresholds in the contralateral ear of ≤20 dB HL (3 frequency PTA of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz).
i. Thresholds should be measured using inserts wherever possible, or in the sound field to record the better-hearing ear alone. Required thresholds will include 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz for air conduction. All other octave frequencies should be attempted. Bone conduction thresholds should be obtained at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Masking should be attempted where appropriate. As participants are very young and masking is difficult for this population, suspected shadow audiograms will be sufficient if objective testing has confirmed a severe-to-profound unilateral hearing loss. Testing should confirm a severe-to-profound hearing loss, defined as a 3-frequency PTA (500, 1000, and 2000) \>70 dB HL in one ear and ≤20 dB HL in the contralateral ear. The Primary Investigator and Lead Diagnostic Audiologist must agree on this diagnosis for enrollment.
3. Insufficient functional access to sound with appropriately fit amplification and aural habilitation (based on best practices and standard of care) defined as:
1. PEACH + parent questionnaire scores below the expected value for children who lack the requisite language to complete open-set word recognition testing or
2. Recorded Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) scores ≤ 30% in the ear to be implanted for children with the requisite language to complete open-set word recognition testing.
4. Between 7 months and 2 years, 11 months of age at implantation
5. Normal cochlear nerve as evaluated by imaging, required imaging by MRI brain/Internal auditory canal (IAC) without contrast with heavily weighted T2 images. CT optional at the physician's discretion.
6. No malformation of the cochlea
7. No evidence of progressive hearing loss of the contralateral ear
8. Willing to/has undergone hearing aid trial as warranted based on achieving an aided speech intelligibility index (SII) of \> .65 when fitted via Desired Sensation Level (DSL) methods.
9. Realistic parental expectations: a verbal acknowledgment of the potential benefits and risks, and postoperative variation in performance. For instance, cochlear implantation will not restore normal hearing
10. Willing to obtain recommended meningitis vaccinations per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations
11. Development and cognition within the normal range as measured by the Developmental Assessment of Young Children (DAYC-2).
12. Parental commitment to study parameters including being able and willing to participate in the evaluation schedule, involvement in prescribed therapy, and travel to the investigational site and study-related activities. Parents must be willing to encourage wearing implant during waking hours.
To participate as an SSD control subject, an individual must meet all the following criteria:
1. Provision of signed and dated parental permission form
2. Unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss - congenital or acquired prior to 2 years of age.
1. Unaided residual hearing thresholds that yield a 3 frequency PTA (500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) of ≥70 dB HL in the affected ear.
2. Hearing thresholds in the contralateral ear of ≤20 dB HL (3 frequency PTA of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz)
3. Unable to use or benefit from traditional amplification
3. Five years of age at the time of testing
4. Development and cognition within the normal range as measured by the Early Stanford Binet 2 (SB2).
To participate as a TH control subject, an individual must meet all the following criteria:
1. Provision of signed and dated parental permission form
2. Bilateral hearing thresholds that yield a PTA of ≤20 dB HL (3 frequency PTA of 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz).
3. Five years of age at the time of testing
4. Development and cognition within the normal range as measured by the Early SB2.
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study as a study subject:
1. English is not primary language of the home
1. Speech perception materials are presented in English
2. Parental questionnaires are administered in English
2. Conductive hearing loss in either ear
3. Cochlear nerve deficiency
4. Ossification/Fibrosis of the cochlea precluding implantation
5. Inability to participate in follow-up procedures (i.e., unwillingness, geographic location)
6. History of refractory chronic otitis media or condition that contraindicates anesthesia
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study as a control subject:
1. English is not primary language of the home
1. Speech perception materials are presented in English
2. Parental questionnaires are administered in English
2. Inability to participate in testing (i.e., unwillingness)
7 Months
71 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Med-El Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lisa Park, AuD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Children's Cochlear Implant Center at UNC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bess FH, Tharpe AM. An introduction to unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in children. Ear Hear. 1986 Feb;7(1):3-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198602000-00003.
Bess FH, Tharpe AM. Unilateral hearing impairment in children. Pediatrics. 1984 Aug;74(2):206-16.
Corbin NE, Buss E, Leibold LJ. Spatial Hearing and Functional Auditory Skills in Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4495-4512. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00081. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
Anne S, Lieu JEC, Cohen MS. Speech and Language Consequences of Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):572-579. doi: 10.1177/0194599817726326. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Lieu JEC. Permanent Unilateral Hearing Loss (UHL) and Childhood Development. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2018;6(1):74-81. doi: 10.1007/s40136-018-0185-5. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
Purcell PL, Shinn JR, Davis GE, Sie KC. Children with unilateral hearing loss may have lower intelligence quotient scores: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):746-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.25524. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Bell R, Mouzourakis M, Wise SR. Impact of unilateral hearing loss in early development. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct 1;30(5):344-350. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000848. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Russo FY, De Seta D, Orlando MP, Ralli M, Cammeresi MG, Greco A, de Vincentiis M, Ruoppolo G, Mancini P, Turchetta R. Hearing attention and quality of listening in children with unilateral hearing loss with and without hearing aid. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022 Apr;42(2):169-175. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1746.
McKay S, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM. Amplification considerations for children with minimal or mild bilateral hearing loss and unilateral hearing loss. Trends Amplif. 2008 Mar;12(1):43-54. doi: 10.1177/1084713807313570.
Ead B, Hale S, DeAlwis D, Lieu JE. Pilot study of cognition in children with unilateral hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Nov;77(11):1856-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
Park LR, Griffin AM, Sladen DP, Neumann S, Young NM. American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Clinical Assessment and Management of Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness. Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):255-267. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001204.
Brown KD, Dillon MT, Park LR. Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Childhood Unilateral Hearing Loss (CUHL Trial). Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S1-S18. doi: 10.1002/lary.29853. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
Park LR, Dillon MT, Buss E, O'Connell BP, Brown KD. Spatial Release From Masking in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness. Am J Audiol. 2021 Jun 14;30(2):443-451. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00119. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
Park LR, Preston E, Noxon AS, Dillon MT. Comparison of test methods to assess the implanted ear alone for pediatric cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Sep;22(5):283-290. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1903715. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Nassrallah F, Tang K, Whittingham J, Sun H, Fitzpatrick EM. Auditory, Social, and Behavioral Skills of Children With Unilateral/Mild Hearing Loss. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):167-177. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz041.
Bess FH, Davis H, Camarata S, Hornsby BWY. Listening-Related Fatigue in Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jan 8;51(1):84-97. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-OCHL-19-0017. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Hoff S, Ryan M, Thomas D, Tournis E, Kenny H, Hajduk J, Young NM. Safety and Effectiveness of Cochlear Implantation of Young Children, Including Those With Complicating Conditions. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Apr;40(4):454-463. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002156.
Deep NL, Purcell PL, Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB. Cochlear Implantation in Infants: Evidence of Safety. Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211014695. doi: 10.1177/23312165211014695.
Chweya CM, May MM, DeJong MD, Baas BS, Lohse CM, Driscoll CLW, Carlson ML. Language and Audiological Outcomes Among Infants Implanted Before 9 and 12 Months of Age Versus Older Children: A Continuum of Benefit Associated With Cochlear Implantation at Successively Younger Ages. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jun 1;42(5):686-693. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003011.
Benchetrit L, Ronner EA, Anne S, Cohen MS. Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):58-69. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3852.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-0862
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.