Trial Outcomes & Findings for Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Young Children (NCT NCT01904448)

NCT ID: NCT01904448

Last Updated: 2018-07-05

Results Overview

Complications and related outcomes will be tracked and recorded. These include bleeding, infection, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, brain bleeding or bruising, stroke, death. Also, complications and sequelae related to the device such as non-auditory stimulation and device failure will be tracked.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

5 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Year 3

Results posted on

2018-07-05

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI)
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Overall Study
STARTED
5
Overall Study
COMPLETED
5
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Auditory Brainstem Implantation in Young Children

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
3.4 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 3

Complications and related outcomes will be tracked and recorded. These include bleeding, infection, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, brain bleeding or bruising, stroke, death. Also, complications and sequelae related to the device such as non-auditory stimulation and device failure will be tracked.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Number of ABI Complications
2 Events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 3

OWLS-II: Listening Comprehension measures oral language reception, which is the understanding of spoken language. The examiner orally presents increasingly difficult words, phrases, and sentences to the participant and he/she responds by pointing to or stating which of four pictures is correct. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better listening comprehension. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score
Subject 1
77 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score
Subject 2
46 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score
Subject 3
40 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score
Subject 4
40 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Listening Comprehension Score
Subject 5
62 units on a scale

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 3

OWLS-II: Oral Expression measures oral language expression, which is the use of spoken language. The examiner presents a verbal prompt along with a picture and the participant must respond orally to the prompt with increasingly difficult language. The derived mean standard score for this test is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate better oral expression. Scores of 85 to 115 are within normal limits. Scores that fall 2 standard deviations below the mean are considered to be severely delayed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score
Subject 1
48 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score
Subject 2
50 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score
Subject 3
40 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score
Subject 4
40 units on a scale
The Oral and Written Language Scales (OWLS) Oral Expression Score
Subject 5
58 units on a scale

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 3

Population: Due to limited progress in spoken language development and test difficulty, this measure was replaced by Identifying Early Phonological Needs in children with hearing loss (IEPN). No data were collected for this measure.

The GFTA-2 is a standardized, norm-based articulation measure that samples spontaneous sound production. Children are asked to respond to picture plates and verbal cues from the examiner with single words that test consonant accuracy in initial, medial, and final positions. This measure has norms based on the performance of normal-hearing children from age 2 years to 21 years.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 3

Population: Since spoken language skills did not progress as expected, this measure was inappropriate for use in the study and was unobtainable.

MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDIs)

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

This is a measure of the child's ability to vocalize on demand elicited by pictures of objects. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child vocalized for 25 words.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 1 Year 1
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 1 Year 2
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 1 Year 3
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 2 Year 2
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 2 Year 3
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 3 Year 3
44 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 4 Year 1
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 4 Year 2
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 4 Year 3
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vocalize on Demand
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct for use of syllables elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct number of syllables on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 1 Year 1
40 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 1 Year 2
80 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 1 Year 3
92 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 2 Year 2
40 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 2 Year 3
80 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 3 Year 3
40 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 4 Year 1
60 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 4 Year 2
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 4 Year 3
60 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Syllables
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on initial consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced an initial consonant on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 1 Year 1
63 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 1 Year 2
95 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 1 Year 3
100 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 2 Year 2
66 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 2 Year 3
75 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 3 Year 3
16 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 4 Year 1
71 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 4 Year 2
38 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 4 Year 3
60 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Initial Consonants
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on vowel production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct vowel on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 1 Year 1
12 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 1 Year 2
31 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 1 Year 3
53 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 2 Year 2
12 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 2 Year 3
26 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 3 Year 3
20 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 4 Year 1
28 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 4 Year 2
17 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 4 Year 3
45 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Vowels
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on consonant manner cues production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct manner of consonant production on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 1 Year 1
18 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 1 Year 2
54 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 1 Year 3
56 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 2 Year 2
24 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 2 Year 3
24 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 3 Year 2
4 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 3 Year 3
4 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 4 Year 1
35 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 4 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 4 Year 3
37 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Manner Cues
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on final consonant production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced a final consonant on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 1 Year 1
29 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 1 Year 2
64 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 1 Year 3
94 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 2 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 2 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 3 Year 3
11 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 4 Year 1
11 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 4 Year 2
41 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 4 Year 3
41 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Final Consonants
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on consonant place cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct place of consonant production on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 1 Year 1
20 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 1 Year 2
58 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 1 Year 3
58 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 2 Year 2
27 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 2 Year 3
27 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 3 Year 3
5 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 4 Year 1
28 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 4 Year 2
21 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 4 Year 3
38 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Place Cues
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Measure of percent correct on consonant voicing cue production elicited from pictures of single word items. Scores are derived from the percentage of time the child produced the correct voicing of consonant production on 25 items.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 1 Year 1
16 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 1 Year 2
67 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 1 Year 3
90 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 2 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 2 Year 2
41 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 2 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 3 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 3 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 3 Year 3
3 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 4 Year 1
41 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 4 Year 2
20 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 4 Year 3
51 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 5 Year 1
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 5 Year 2
0 percentage of correct answers
Percentage of Correctly Produced Items From the Identifying Early Phonological Needs in Children With Hearing Loss (IEPN) Test-Voice Cues
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Sound detection for octave frequencies of 250 Hz through 8k Hz were collected and a 4 frequency average was calculated for each annual test interval

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 5 Year 2
33 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 5 Year 3
32 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
Pure Tone Average (PTA) Subject 1 Year 1
30 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 1 Year 2
42 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 1 Year 3
30 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 2 Year 1
120 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 2 Year 2
47 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 2 Year 3
35 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 3 Year 1
33 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 3 Year 2
32 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 3 Year 3
30 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 4 Year 1
32 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 4 Year 2
30 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 4 Year 3
33 averaged decibel level
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Detection Audiogram
PTA Subject 5 Year 1
35 averaged decibel level

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-ABI, Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until demonstrating a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) is a parent questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding a young infant or toddler's auditory behavior, e.g., "Does the child spontaneously respond to his/her name in quiet with auditory cues?" Each question is scored on a five point scale: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = frequently, and 4 = always. The aim of this tool is to assess the benefit of the child's personal amplification device(s) and is used to assess hearing aid benefit. Higher scores reflect more consistent auditory response. Scores reported are the percentage of correctly answered questions of the total asked.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 1 Pre-ABI
3 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 1 Year 1
43 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 1 Year 2
32 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 1 Year 3
42 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 2 Pre-ABI
0 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 2 Year 1
28 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 2 Year 2
12 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 2 Year 3
72 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 3 Pre-ABI
0 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 3 Year 1
52 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 3 Year 2
70 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 3 Year 3
33 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 4 Pre-ABI
75 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 4 Year 1
50 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 4 Year 2
55 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 4 Year 3
52 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 5 Pre-ABI
0 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 5 Year 1
2 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 5 Year 2
5 percent correct
Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-IT-MAIS or MAIS
Subject 5 Year 3
0 percent correct

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Ling- 6 sounds test is a speech sound detection measurement of detection thresholds performed by an audiologist. Six sound files of "ah", "ee", "oo", "sh", "s", and "m" are presented one at a time in varying order for measurement of hearing threshold groups, per sound. The selected sounds tested validate hearing device fitting across the frequency range important for understanding speech. If the child can detect the stimuli a point is given and if they can not detect, no point is given. A total of 3 trials per sound were presented for a total of 18 presentations. The score reflects a percent of the total sounds that were detected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 1 Year 1
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 1 Year 2
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 1 Year 3
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 2 Year 1
0 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 2 Year 2
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 2 Year 3
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 3 Year 1
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 3 Year 2
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 3 Year 3
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 4 Year 1
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 4 Year 2
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 4 Year 3
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 5 Year 1
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 5 Year 2
100 percent correct
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-Ling Sound Test
Ling 6 Subject 5 Year 3
100 percent correct

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Missing values indicate test was not administered at that interval and ESP-Standard was administered.

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) low verbal version estimates speech perception abilities in very young children who have limited verbal abilities. Stimuli consist of words varying in pattern as well as spondees and monosyllabic words presented in sets of four. The format is four item closed-set. Test materials consist of objects (toys) instead of pictures. It is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of 4; 3 repetitions of each item are given for a total of 12 trials.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=4 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 1 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 1 Year 1
58 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 1 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 1 Year 2
100 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 1 Year 2
75 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 1 Year 2
67 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 2 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 2 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 2 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 2 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 2 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 2 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 2 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 2 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 2 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 3 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 3 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 3 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 3 Year 2
83 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 3 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 3 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 5 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 5 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 5 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 5 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 5 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 5 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Pattern Subject 5 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Monosyllable Subject 5 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Low Verbal
Spondee Subject 5 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Missing values indicate test was not administered at that interval and ESP-LV (Low Verbal) was administered.

A hierarchy of tests were chosen that capture auditory skills from sound awareness to open set word and sentence understanding. Participants did not advance to the next level of difficulty until they demonstrated a minimum performance on the previous measure. This may have been due to child's age or inability to complete task. The Early Speech Perception (ESP) Standard measures the progression of speech discrimination skills in children (age 5+) with profound hearing loss as they develop. The stimuli consist of 3 subtests \[1) patterns and words, 2) monosyllable, 3) spondees\] of 12 pictured words each presented in an auditory-only condition. The format is a closed-set. Two repetitions of each item are given for a total of 24 items for each subtest. Each subtest is scored by the percent of correctly identified items from the set of pictured words.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=3 Participants
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 1 Year 3
70 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 1 Year 3
62 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 1 Year 3
50 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 1 Year 3
41 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 3 Year 2
66 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 3 Year 2
41 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 3 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 3 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 3 Year 3
46 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 3 Year 3
29 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 3 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 3 Year 3
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 4 Year 1
50 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 4 Year 1
45 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 4 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 4 Year 1
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 4 Year 2
45 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 4 Year 2
41 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 4 Year 2
16 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 4 Year 2
25 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Pattern Subject 4 Year 3
53 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Word Subject 4 Year 3
42 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Monosyllable Subject 4 Year 3
8 percentage of correct answers
Change in Speech Perception Test Battery Scores-ESP Standard
Spondee Subject 4 Year 3
42 percentage of correct answers

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Year 1, Year 2, Year 3

Population: Since spoken language skills did not progress as expected, this measure was inappropriate for use in the study and was unobtainable.

The PLS-5 is a standardized language test designed for infants and young children. The Auditory Comprehension subscale targets skills known to precede language development, including: attention to speakers, appropriate object play, basic vocabulary, concepts, grammatical markers, and complex sentences. The Expressive Communication subscale assesses vocal development, social communication, naming of common objects, phonological awareness, sequencing skills, as well as use of concepts, prepositions, grammatical markers, and varying sentence structures.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Pediatric ABI

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Pediatric ABI
n=5 participants at risk
Single-arm study of Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) in children
Surgical and medical procedures
Cerebral Spinal Fluid (CSF) Leak
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the three year study course following enrollment for each participant.
Surgical and medical procedures
Aseptic Meningitis
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the three year study course following enrollment for each participant.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Craig A. Buchman, MD, FACS

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Phone: 314-362-7395

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place