Triadic Expectations: Decision Making in the Context of Cancer Treatment
NCT ID: NCT01898481
Last Updated: 2014-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
38 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-08-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Mindfulness-based Intervention for Children and Young Adults With High Grade or High-Risk Cancer and Their Caregivers
NCT03538587
Cancer and Mild Cognitive Impairment a Patient-Caregiver Behavioral Intervention
NCT04826315
Stress and Coping in Caregivers of Younger Patients With Cancer
NCT02725385
Evaluating the Effects of Psycho-oncological Education on Distress and Quality of Life in Solid Tumor Cancer Patients
NCT02370836
Intervention Study of Communication in Oncologist-Patient Encounters
NCT00994578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AIM 1: Test the feasibility of identifying and interviewing health care triads (patients, loved ones, and oncologists) in a research study about treatment decisions.
AIM 2: Assess perceptions of the decision-making experience from the perspective of three parties within the health care triad (patients, loved ones, and oncologists) and examine the relationships among the triadic perspectives.
AIM 3: Explore concordance or discordance within the triad about cancer treatment decisions and assess decisional conflict, decisional regret, and distress.
This is an exploratory pilot study of 25 health care triads. Triads will include: (1) a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer, (2) a loved one, and (3) an oncology provider. In a few instances, the study team may interview more than one oncologist or loved one per patient.
In phase one of recruitment, oncologists will be recruited and enrolled. In phase two, the study team will recruit patients who receive care from at least one enrolled oncologist and at least one of the patient's friends or family members. While oncology providers may participate in the study with multiple patients and their loved ones, the patients will be unique to each triad.
Investigators anticipate enrolling two triads per week for a total of three months. They will utilize mainly qualitative methods, and specifically, content analysis, in this exploratory pilot study to (1) further hone and develop research questions and aims for a larger study with appropriate statistical power, (2) test the feasibility of recruiting health care triads in the oncology context, and (3) strengthen our study design, protocols and surveys. The investigators plan to use an iterative process of coding to allow for protocol and survey revisions, and in particular the inclusion of new probes, during the study. The codebook will include inductive and deductive codes related to the general decision making process, expectations and decisional outcomes, conflict and concordance between members of the triad, and other relevant topics. Two coders will review each interview and the team will review for themes and exemplars. The investigators plan to pilot three scales in this study that might be used in a larger future study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Health Care Triads
This is an exploratory pilot study of 25 health care triads. Triads will include: (1) a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer, (2) a loved one, and (3) an oncology provider.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* An attending physician or fellow at Duke University Medical Center;
* Medical, surgical or radiation oncologist;
* Provides care to patients diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions:
* Recurrent or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), also known as acute myelogenous leukemia or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL);
* Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase;
* Non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), relapsed or refractory;
* Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory;
* Metastatic pancreatic cancer;
* Metastatic colorectal cancer;
* Metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer;
* Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
* At least 18 years of age;
* A Duke patient receiving care from an oncology provider who is enrolled in the study;
* Currently admitted to the Duke University hematological malignancies in-patient service OR being seen at Duke's outpatient GI cancer clinic;
* Made a cancer treatment decision in the last 3 months;
* Diagnosed with one of the following:
* Recurrent or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), also known as acute myelogenous leukemia or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL);
* Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase;
* Non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), relapsed or refractory;
* Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory;
* Metastatic pancreatic cancer;
* Metastatic colorectal cancer;
* Metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer;
* Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
* At least 18 years of age;
* Identified by patient as influential in a recent (within 3 months) treatment decision;
* Able and willing to complete the study interview in person or by telephone.
Exclusion for all Subjects:
* Lacking capacity to give legally effective consent;
* Does not read or understand English.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Tulsky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Dan Ariely, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00045101
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.