Triadic Expectations: Decision Making in the Context of Cancer Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01898481

Last Updated: 2014-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of identifying and interviewing healthcare triads (patients, loved ones and oncologists) in a research study and evaluate the influences of patients' loved ones and oncologists on cancer treatment decision-making. the study team plans to explore concordance or discordance within the triad about the decisions, and also assess decisional conflict, regret and distress. Study methods involve interviewing a total of 75 patients, their loved ones and oncologists about past cancer treatment decisions. Analysis will consist mainly of qualitative content analysis. The investigators do not anticipate risk or safety issues beyond loss of confidentiality or minimal discomfort while discussing a cancer treatment decision.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall goal of this study is to evaluate the influences of oncologists and patients' loved ones on cancer treatment decision-making. The specific aims are:

AIM 1: Test the feasibility of identifying and interviewing health care triads (patients, loved ones, and oncologists) in a research study about treatment decisions.

AIM 2: Assess perceptions of the decision-making experience from the perspective of three parties within the health care triad (patients, loved ones, and oncologists) and examine the relationships among the triadic perspectives.

AIM 3: Explore concordance or discordance within the triad about cancer treatment decisions and assess decisional conflict, decisional regret, and distress.

This is an exploratory pilot study of 25 health care triads. Triads will include: (1) a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer, (2) a loved one, and (3) an oncology provider. In a few instances, the study team may interview more than one oncologist or loved one per patient.

In phase one of recruitment, oncologists will be recruited and enrolled. In phase two, the study team will recruit patients who receive care from at least one enrolled oncologist and at least one of the patient's friends or family members. While oncology providers may participate in the study with multiple patients and their loved ones, the patients will be unique to each triad.

Investigators anticipate enrolling two triads per week for a total of three months. They will utilize mainly qualitative methods, and specifically, content analysis, in this exploratory pilot study to (1) further hone and develop research questions and aims for a larger study with appropriate statistical power, (2) test the feasibility of recruiting health care triads in the oncology context, and (3) strengthen our study design, protocols and surveys. The investigators plan to use an iterative process of coding to allow for protocol and survey revisions, and in particular the inclusion of new probes, during the study. The codebook will include inductive and deductive codes related to the general decision making process, expectations and decisional outcomes, conflict and concordance between members of the triad, and other relevant topics. Two coders will review each interview and the team will review for themes and exemplars. The investigators plan to pilot three scales in this study that might be used in a larger future study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Care Decision Making

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Health Care Triads

This is an exploratory pilot study of 25 health care triads. Triads will include: (1) a patient diagnosed with advanced cancer, (2) a loved one, and (3) an oncology provider.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 18 years of age;
* An attending physician or fellow at Duke University Medical Center;
* Medical, surgical or radiation oncologist;
* Provides care to patients diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions:

* Recurrent or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), also known as acute myelogenous leukemia or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL);
* Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase;
* Non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), relapsed or refractory;
* Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory;
* Metastatic pancreatic cancer;
* Metastatic colorectal cancer;
* Metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer;
* Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma.


* At least 18 years of age;
* A Duke patient receiving care from an oncology provider who is enrolled in the study;
* Currently admitted to the Duke University hematological malignancies in-patient service OR being seen at Duke's outpatient GI cancer clinic;
* Made a cancer treatment decision in the last 3 months;
* Diagnosed with one of the following:

* Recurrent or refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), also known as acute myelogenous leukemia or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL);
* Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast phase;
* Non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), relapsed or refractory;
* Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), relapsed or refractory;
* Metastatic pancreatic cancer;
* Metastatic colorectal cancer;
* Metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer;
* Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma.


* At least 18 years of age;
* Identified by patient as influential in a recent (within 3 months) treatment decision;
* Able and willing to complete the study interview in person or by telephone.

Exclusion for all Subjects:

* Lacking capacity to give legally effective consent;
* Does not read or understand English.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Tulsky, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Dan Ariely, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00045101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ICAN Symptoms Duke-NUS
NCT02787993 COMPLETED NA