DISCOVERY: Evaluating a Decision Support Tool for Adults Seen in Hematology/Oncology Clinics
NCT ID: NCT06296368
Last Updated: 2026-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-21
2028-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Financial Navigation Program to Improve Understanding and Management of Financial Aspects of Cancer Care for Patients and Their Spouses
NCT04960787
Personalized Information or Basic Information in Helping Patients Make Decisions About Participating in a Clinical Trial
NCT00750009
Intervention to Address Psychosocial Needs Among Socially Disadvantaged Older Adults With Cancer
NCT05828654
Evaluating a Bidirectional Priming Intervention for Goals-of-care Communication in Oncology
NCT06955468
Communicating Health Information and Improving Coordination With Primary Care
NCT03104543
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patient preferences have traditionally been inferred from face-to-face conversations. However, numerous studies, including several systematic reviews, have demonstrated that this process alone is inadequate to reliably capture patient preferences. To support standard shared decision making, multiple stakeholders strongly advocate the development of validated patient-reported measures that accurately capture patients' preferences. In recent guidance about the care of older adults with leukemia, the American Society of Hematology explicitly recommends the development of novel decision support tools to address this growing challenge in patient-centered care. Improved shared decision making has been associated with increased patient-reported quality of care and satisfaction, and a reduction in healthcare utilization.
This study will determine the effectiveness of a novel decision support tool called "PRIME" (Preference Reporting to Improve Management and Experience) to improve the values-concordance of initial treatment decisions. Using best-worst scaling, a validated values-elicitation method, PRIME provides a personalized report to providers and patients of their most important treatment priorities.
In this pragmatic trial, participants will be randomized to receive decision support with PRIME or usual care prior to their first visit with their oncologist. The primary outcome will be clinically significant improvement in values-concordance of the initial treatment decision (on CollaboRATE, a validated 12-point measure).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Receive usual care.
No interventions assigned to this group
PRIME intervention
Receive the PRIME intervention.
Preference Reporting to Improve Management and Experience (PRIME)
PRIME is a decision support tool that uses best-worst scaling to provide a personalized report to providers and patients of their most important treatment priorities
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preference Reporting to Improve Management and Experience (PRIME)
PRIME is a decision support tool that uses best-worst scaling to provide a personalized report to providers and patients of their most important treatment priorities
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subjects are willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgment of the investigator.
3. Age ≥ 60 years at the time of consent.
4. New patient to either the hematologic malignancies clinic or the bone marrow transplant/cellular therapy clinic.
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel R Richardson, MD, MA, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lineberger Comphrehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCCC2305
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.