Erectile Rating During the Treatment of Rectal Cancers Localized
NCT ID: NCT01843218
Last Updated: 2025-09-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Individual Follow-up After Rectal Cancer - Focus on the Needs of the Patient
NCT03622437
Sexual Function and Wellbeing in Males With Rectal Cancer
NCT01216202
Study of the Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Women After Rectal Cancer Surgery and Analysis of the Impact of a Sexologist Intervention
NCT05933122
Early Intervention for Erectile Dysfunction After Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT01912586
Assessment of Patients' Quality of Sexual Life After Anal Cancer Treatment
NCT05109468
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It develops more gradually, over a period of several weeks or months. After treatment combining radiotherapy and surgery, the risk of sexual dysfunction is significant and can affect up to 90% of patients.
In an attempt to improve these results, surgical techniques have gradually evolved towards complete resection of the mesorectum with nerve preservation. Studies published on this subject show an improvement in functional outcomes, without any deterioration in oncological outcomes. This has now become the standard surgical technique.
In the specific case of the management of neoplastic disease, it is common to observe a reactive anxiety-depression syndrome in patients. This mood disorder affects libido and sexuality. A lack of sexual activity in the postoperative period is therefore not necessarily related to iatrogenic vascular-nerve damage. In order to improve patients' quality of life, it is useful to know how to objectively diagnose post-operative erectile dysfunction. This diagnosis should make it possible to distinguish between disorders related to vascular-nervous damage and those that are part of a post-operative anxiety-depression syndrome.
An accurate diagnosis of sexual dysfunction can lead to specific treatment:
intracavernosal injections of prostaglandins are the standard treatment, but phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors can also be used. For these reasons, it is necessary to develop a method for evaluating objective erectile dysfunction after resection.
The Rigiscan Plus device is a commercially available measurement tool that has received CE certification.
It can be used to assess several parameters of erection: rigidity, intensity, and duration. This measuring device has been validated for the assessment of erectile dysfunction, and normal values have been established in healthy subjects.
Combining these two tests makes it possible to assess the presence or absence of erections during REM sleep and to objectively diagnose erectile dysfunction:
in the presence of decreased libido, nocturnal erections are preserved, whereas they are impaired following vascular-nervous damage. Recording nocturnal erections is useful for assessing erectile dysfunction after rectal surgery in two ways. Preoperatively, it provides objective confirmation that the patient has spontaneous erections of good quality. Postoperatively, recording allows confirmation that the autonomic nervous system required for erection has been preserved. It is an objective examination that is independent of the patient's libido, which is often impaired by the treatment of a neoplastic disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with localized rectal cancer
Assessment (at night) of erctile dysfunction using R/P recording (RIGISCAN® PLUS / polysomonography)
Evaluation of erectile dysfunction
Assessment (at night) of erctile dysfunction using R/P recording (RIGISCAN® PLUS / polysomonography)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of erectile dysfunction
Assessment (at night) of erctile dysfunction using R/P recording (RIGISCAN® PLUS / polysomonography)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age greater than 18 years.
3. Neoplastic rectal stage ≤ T3.
4. Patient sexually active before diagnosis.
5. Laparoscopic surgery.
6. Medico-surgical institute Bergonié.
7. Patient information and consent for participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Absence of sexual activity before diagnosis.
3. Presence of secondary lesions at diagnosis (M +).
4. Classified T4 tumor preoperatively.
5. Surgery by laparotomy.
6. History of pelvic cancer surgery prostate or bladder.
7. History of pelvic radiotherapy (outside of the current process).
8. History of prostate or bladder neoplasia known.
9. Other neoplastic known.
10. Patient for psychological, social, family or geographical could not be treated or monitored regularly according to the criteria of the study, patient deprived of liberty or under guardianship.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Bergonié
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
EVRARD Serge, PU-PH
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Bergonié
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IB2008-07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.