Evaluation of Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Versus a Face-to-Face Assessment During a Skin Cancer Screening Event
NCT ID: NCT01820234
Last Updated: 2017-07-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators' hypotheses include the following:
1. Compared to in-person assessment, store-and-forward teledermatology assessment will result in adequate diagnostic concordance.
2. Compared to in-person assessment, store-and-forward teledermatology results in adequate management concordance.
3. The sensitivity and specificity of store-and-forward evaluation to detecting lesions that are either premalignant or malignant will be similar to that of in-person evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Teledermatology and Modulation of Antibiotic Dose in Acne Vulgaris
NCT02905851
Skin Health in Young Adults - Preventing Indoor Tanning and Promoting Sun Protection
NCT03132012
Comparison Between Interactive Internet-based Education and Counseling for the Management of Acne With That of Internet-based Education Alone
NCT02031718
Tailored Patient-Provider Communication (TPPC): Evaluating the Impact of TPPC in Dermatology Patients
NCT04633616
Visible Light Study
NCT02663921
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In-person dermatology evaluation
Health care modality
In-person dermatology evaluation
Every patient will be evaluated by an in person dermatologist present at the screening.
Store-and-forward teledermatology evaluation
Health care modality
Store-and-forward teledermatology evaluation
Every patient will be evaluated online via a store and forward teledermatology modality.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
In-person dermatology evaluation
Every patient will be evaluated by an in person dermatologist present at the screening.
Store-and-forward teledermatology evaluation
Every patient will be evaluated online via a store and forward teledermatology modality.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide a brief medical history and have/allow an examination of their skin including photographs.
* Capable of giving informed consent.
* Will be able to receive notification of follow-up recommendations
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient who are unable to fulfill tasks of this study
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Davis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
April W Armstrong, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Davis
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, Davis Shifa Community Clinic
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201018315
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.