Diagnosis of Urethral Stricture With Sono-urethrography vs Conventional Urethrography (SONO-URETHRA)

NCT ID: NCT01790776

Last Updated: 2023-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Conventional urethrography is the standard diagnostic evaluation for patients with a suspicion of urethral stricture. The radiation dose of this examination is 5-9 mSV. Sono-urethrography was introduced in 1988 (McAninch et al. , J Urol 1988); the diagnostic accuracy of sono-urethrography is equal compared to conventional urethrography, with even a better measurement of stricture length and degree of spongiofibrosis with sono-urethrography. However, sono-urethrography remained underused among urologists and radiologists.

Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups:

Group A: conventional urethrography Group B: sono-urethrography In case sono-urethrography is inconclusive or of poor quality, a conventional urethrography will be performed.

The radiation dose in the two groups will be measured. The stricture length and location will be recorded and compared with the perioperative findings in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. The complications of the procedure(s) will be recorded with a questionnaire directly after and two weeks after the conventional or sono-urethrography.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urethral Stricture Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional urethrography

Current golden standard.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Urografin 30%

Intervention Type RADIATION

Urografin 30% (Natrium amidotrizoas 10G, Megalumin, Amidotrizoas 65G, Natrii calcii edetas, water for injection 250 ml, with 146 mg iodium/ml).

The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (urografin 30 %) is instilled.

Sono-urethrography

Experimental urethrography, which could be followed by conventional urethrography if the results are inconclusive.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NaCl 0,9 % in aqua

Intervention Type RADIATION

The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (NaCl 0,9 % in aqua) is instilled. If the result is inconclusive, urografin 30 % will be instilled.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Urografin 30%

Urografin 30% (Natrium amidotrizoas 10G, Megalumin, Amidotrizoas 65G, Natrii calcii edetas, water for injection 250 ml, with 146 mg iodium/ml).

The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (urografin 30 %) is instilled.

Intervention Type RADIATION

NaCl 0,9 % in aqua

The tip of a bladder catheter is placed at the external urethral meatus and fixed at this location. The solution (NaCl 0,9 % in aqua) is instilled. If the result is inconclusive, urografin 30 % will be instilled.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a suspicion of urethral stricture disease for which an indication of imaging of the urethra exists.

Exclusion Criteria

* Transsexual patients.
* Patients with perineostomy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolaas Lumen, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012/902

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 UNKNOWN PHASE4