Small Bowel Cleansing for Capsule Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT01783782

Last Updated: 2013-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of this prospective, randomized and controlled study was to evaluate the effect of five bowel preparation regimens on small-bowel cleansing in a pediatric population. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the safety and the effects of preparation on diagnostic yield of CE.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a well-known, non-invasive, diagnostic tool to evaluate small bowel diseases in adults and children. Unfortunately, because CE does not have functions which allow suctioning of fluid or washing the small bowel mucosa during the examination, its diagnostic yield can be limited by presence of debris, biliary secretion, bubbles and blood in the gut lumen that may hide relevant findings especially in the distal small bowel. In addition, CE sometimes fails to reach the cecum within the battery life of the capsule, resulting in a failure to visualize the distal small intestine. However, in children this problem is less frequent for the increased intestinal motility, which reduces the transit time of the capsule.

It was believed that cleaning the small intestine prior to examination would improve mucosal visibility during the endoscopy and, as a result, the diagnostic yield of the technique. Therefore, proposals were put forward based on preparations for other types of explorations, such as colonoscopies (2).

Some authors have already studied in adults the effect of bowel preparation on small-bowel visualization using different agents; the results of the published series are contradictory. To date, while there is evidence for a benefit from bowel preparation for CE, there is so far no consensus on an optimal preparation regimen. In addition, in children there are not studies on this topic. Therefore, overnight fasting before the examination still remains the proposed preparation for capsule endoscopy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Capsule Endoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DIET

Group A followed the standard regime consisting of a clear liquid diet for 12 hours on the day before CE, followed by an overnight fast.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DIET

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

clear liquid diet for 12 hours on the day before CE, followed by an overnight fast

HIGH PEG

Group B received a high volume regime consisting of a 50 mL/Kg (up to 2 Lt/die) of polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon solution the evening before the examination, followed always by an overnight fast.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received a high volume regime consisting of a 50 mL/Kg (up to 2 Lt/die) of PEG solution the evening before the examination, followed always by an overnight fast

LOW PEG

Group C, defined as a low volume regime, received 25 mL/Kg (up to 1Lt/die) of polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon solution the evening before the examination, followed by an overnight fast.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received a high volume regime consisting of a 50 mL/Kg (up to 2 Lt/die) of PEG solution the evening before the examination, followed always by an overnight fast

SIMETHICONE

Group D received 20 mL oral simethicone (Panamir, DMG, Italy, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1mL emulsion) and 200mL water 30 minutes before capsule ingestion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

simethicon

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received 20 mL oral simethicone (Panamir, DMG, Italy, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1mL emulsion) and 200mL water 30 minutes before capsule ingestion

SIMETH+PEG

Group E received 25 mL/Kg (up to 1 Lt/die) of polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon solution followed by an overnight fast plus 20mL oral simethicone and 200mL water 30 minutes before capsule ingestion.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon

Intervention Type DRUG

patients received a high volume regime consisting of a 50 mL/Kg (up to 2 Lt/die) of PEG solution the evening before the examination, followed always by an overnight fast

simethicon

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received 20 mL oral simethicone (Panamir, DMG, Italy, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1mL emulsion) and 200mL water 30 minutes before capsule ingestion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DIET

clear liquid diet for 12 hours on the day before CE, followed by an overnight fast

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

polyethylene glycol 4000 solution with simethicon

patients received a high volume regime consisting of a 50 mL/Kg (up to 2 Lt/die) of PEG solution the evening before the examination, followed always by an overnight fast

Intervention Type DRUG

simethicon

Patients received 20 mL oral simethicone (Panamir, DMG, Italy, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1mL emulsion) and 200mL water 30 minutes before capsule ingestion

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

selg-esse Panamir V

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing elective Small Bowel capsule endoscopy in our Institution between 2 and 18 years of age were recruited for this study.

Exclusion Criteria

* intestinal obstruction,
* suspicious impaired intestinal motility,
* history of gastrointestinal surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Policlinico Umberto I

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Giovanni Di Nardo

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Departments of Pediatrics, Sapienza - University of Rome

Rome, Rome, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Giovanni Di Nardo, MD

Role: primary

+390649979326

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLEANSING FOR PED-CE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.