The Assessments of the Postoperative Recovery on Elderly Patients Received General Anesthesia or Peripheral Nerve Blocks

NCT ID: NCT01782612

Last Updated: 2013-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative recovery is always worrisome to the elder patients undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR). Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs), lumbar plexus block combined with sciatic nerve blocks, may be alterative anaesthesia style to the fragile patients. But pervious papers suggested PNBs were commonly administered in conjunction with general anesthesia (GA), or the blocks were performed primarily for postoperative analgesia. Hardly any research has reported in use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs) as primary anesthesia style for Total Hip Replacement (THR). The investigators compare peripheral nerve blocks to general anesthesia on elderly eld patients undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) by assessing the Postoperative Recovery and Delirium

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be followed by a blinded investigator for a 7days period to record the development of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary complications defined by a broad composite that included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, new atrial or ventricular dysrhythmia requiring treatment, cerebrovascular insult, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Protocol This will be a randomized, prospective, single-center, assessor blinded study comparing two different anesthesia styles in 150 elderly patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. We expect to enroll all patients in a 7 days period postoperation.

The study will be performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles, and written informed consent will be obtained from each patient. Preoperatively baseline values will be obtained for the cardiovascular, mental status, respiratory measures.

Mental status: During their preoperative visit patients will be given the neuropsychological tests in the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. This extended measure of general cognition was developed to overcome shortcomings of the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination score, specifically its ceiling effects and narrow range of possible scores.

Each patient will be interviewed by the same trained research assistant before surgery and during the postoperative visits.

Postoperative Delirium and postoperative recovery will be recorded by an assessor blinded to the allocation.

Patients will be randomly allocated to two groups on the day of surgery using a computer generated assignment. GA Group will receive general anaesthesia and PNBs group will receive Peripheral Nerve Blocks.

General anaesthesia:A standardized balanced anesthetic technique was provided in GA group. Briefly, after standard external monitors, pulse oximeter, electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, were applied on subject's arrival in the operation room. Subjects had an intravenous line placed in the upper extremity. Anesthesia was administered with midazolam (0.015-0.03 mg.kg-1), fentanyl (1.8-3.5µg.kg-1), etomidate (0.2-0.3mg.kg-1) and rocuronium (0.4-0.6 mg.kg-1), and then suitable laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was facilitated with a respiratory rate of 10-12 bpm, an I:E ratio of 1:2, positive end-respiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O and an fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.4. Tidal volume will be adjusted to an end tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg. Maintaining with remifentanil (0.15-0.30 µg.kg-1.min-1), target concentrations of propofol (0.6-2.0 µg.mL-1) and sevoflurane (0.8 MAC) with 100% oxygen. Infusion rates of propofol and remifentanil varied according to clinical judgment and bispectral index (BIS) range between 40 and 60. All procedures were performed by two veteran anaesthetists.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs):Patients received midazolam (0.015-0.03 mg.kg-1), fentanyl (1.5-2.5µg.kg-1) by infusion, in divided doses, before lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocking and supplemental 100% oxygen (3 L.min-1) was administered by facemask spontaneously breathing during the procedure. The procedure was performed by two anesthesiologists with extensive experience in nerve block. After sterile preparation and draping, PNBs were administered using a 21-gauge, 100-mm simplex block needle and a nerve stimulator. A posterior approach to lumbar plexus block was performed with patient in the lateral decubitus position and after a quadriceps muscle response had been identified with nerve stimulator settings at 2 hertz frequency and current between 0.3 and 0.5 milliampere(mA), and 0.4% ropivacaine (25-30 mL) was injected slowly. Sciatic nerve block was performed in the same position after a twitch of hamstrings, soleus, foot, or toes, had been elicited using the similar current, and 0.4% ropivacaine (15-20 mL) was injected slowly. Sensory and motor blocks on the operated limb were evaluated every 5 min after completion of the procedure until achievement of adequate sensory (loss of pinprick sensation on both the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve distributions) and motor (inability to extend the leg with the knee passively flexed) blocks. Sedation during the surgery procedure was provided by propofol (0.3-1.5 µg.mL-1) with the aim of maintaining BIS (60-80), light sleep with easy being aroused.

Every patient shows signs of inadequate anesthesia such as an increase in systolic arterial blood pressure\>20% from baseline or a heart rate greater than 90 in the absence of hypovolemia, sweating, flushing or movement fentanyl, 50-100 µg, may be administered. Persistent hypertension without signs of inadequate anesthesia will be treated with nicardipine, 0.4 mg IV, every 3 min until return to baseline value. In both groups patients with a heart rate less than 50 bpm not correlated with blood pressure variation will receive atropine 0.3 mg every 3 minutes until heart rate is back to at least 50 bpm. In all patients, from anesthetic induction to end of surgery, a decrease in systolic blood pressure of more than 30% less than baseline values will be treated with ephedrine 6 mg or phenylephrine 100 µg every 3 min until return to baseline value. Propofol will be stopped at completion of skin closure. Intraoperatively, each patient will also receive 2 mg of tropisetron to decrease postoperative nausea.

The doses of all IV drugs and duration of anesthesia and surgery will be recorded. Ephedrine and phenylephrine consumption and the amount of intravascular fluid administration and all the intraoperative drug dose adjustments will be recorded. The esophageal temperature of the patients will be monitored and maintained at 36 C using a force-air warming blanket and warmed i.v. fluids. Postoperative Recovery of the PQRS will be measured on presurgery, 15 minute, 40 minute, 1 day, 3day, 7day postoperatively. Postoperative Delirium will be measured on 1 day,2 day, 3day postoperatively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Hip Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

General Ansethesia

Subjects undergoing Total uni-Hip Replacement will receive standard General Anesthesia with Laryngeal Mask Airway and Multimodal analgesic techniques

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multimodal analgesic techniques

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Postoperative pain was controlled for all patients routinely by intravenous sulfentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PICA) in combination with Parecoxib(40 mg, every 12 h). PICA was continued with sulfentanil (1.25 µg.h-1) and 1.25 µg sulfentanil bolus with a 8-min lockout time. Oral oxycodone 0.2 mg was administered necessarily.

Total uni-Hip Replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All subjects will undergo standard Total uni-Hip Replacement

Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Subjects undergoing Total uni-Hip Replacement will receive Lumbar plexus block and Sciatic nerve block with 0.4% Ropivacaine and Multimodal analgesic techniques

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Multimodal analgesic techniques

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Postoperative pain was controlled for all patients routinely by intravenous sulfentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PICA) in combination with Parecoxib(40 mg, every 12 h). PICA was continued with sulfentanil (1.25 µg.h-1) and 1.25 µg sulfentanil bolus with a 8-min lockout time. Oral oxycodone 0.2 mg was administered necessarily.

Total uni-Hip Replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All subjects will undergo standard Total uni-Hip Replacement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multimodal analgesic techniques

Postoperative pain was controlled for all patients routinely by intravenous sulfentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PICA) in combination with Parecoxib(40 mg, every 12 h). PICA was continued with sulfentanil (1.25 µg.h-1) and 1.25 µg sulfentanil bolus with a 8-min lockout time. Oral oxycodone 0.2 mg was administered necessarily.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total uni-Hip Replacement

All subjects will undergo standard Total uni-Hip Replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 75years old
* Undergoing primary total uni-hip arthroplasty surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
* Mini-Mental score examination (MMSE) being more than 23

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal to participate in the study
* Failure of regional block
* Insulin dependent diabetes
* Allergic to local anesthetics or general anesthetics
* History of opioid dependence
* Contraindications to nerve blocks (coagulation defects, infection at puncture site, preexisting neurological deficits in the lower extremities)
* Patient refusal to participate in the study
* Current severe psychiatric disease or alcoholism or drug dependence
* Severe visual or auditory disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Junle Liu

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Junle Liu

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhang Hong, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor and Director, Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anesthesia and Operation Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zhang Hong, Ph.D

Role: CONTACT

0086-10-66937462

Wang XiaoLin, M.D

Role: CONTACT

0086-10-66938059

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhang Hong, Director

Role: primary

0086-10-66937462

Wang Xiaolin

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):892-905. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20601860 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

THPPLA2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.