Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture
NCT ID: NCT02635763
Last Updated: 2015-12-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PNBs1
Femoral nerve and the lateral cutaneous nerve block combined with general anesthesia
Femoral nerve and the lateral cutaneous nerve block
Femoral nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (15ml) under ultrasound guide;the lateral cutaneous nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (5ml) under ultrasound guide
PNBs2
Lumbar plexus and sacral plexus nerve block combined with general anesthesia
Lumbar plexus and sacral plexus nerve block
Lumbar plexus block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (25ml) under ultrasound guide; sacral plexus nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (15ml) under ultrasound guide
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Femoral nerve and the lateral cutaneous nerve block
Femoral nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (15ml) under ultrasound guide;the lateral cutaneous nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (5ml) under ultrasound guide
Lumbar plexus and sacral plexus nerve block
Lumbar plexus block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (25ml) under ultrasound guide; sacral plexus nerve block was performed using 0.5% ropivacaine (15ml) under ultrasound guide
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The BMI \<30;
3. The Mini - getting the state examination MMSE \> 23;
4. The operation type:open reduction and internal fixation or bipolar head replace.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has a history of cognitive function disorder or mental illness;
3. Has a history of cerebral infarction and leave sequela;
4. The blood coagulation dysfunction;
5. The hearing or visual impairment;
6. Unable to complete assessment;
7. Operation time more than 90 minutes;
8. The bleeding is greater than 1000 ml.
65 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Qingfu Zhang
Shanghaii Sixth People's Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Junfeng Zhang, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Apr;84(4):450-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013468.
Abou-Setta AM, Beaupre LA, Rashiq S, Dryden DM, Hamm MP, Sadowski CA, Menon MR, Majumdar SR, Wilson DM, Karkhaneh M, Mousavi SS, Wong K, Tjosvold L, Jones CA. Comparative effectiveness of pain management interventions for hip fracture: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Aug 16;155(4):234-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00346.
Liu J, Yuan W, Wang X, Royse CF, Gong M, Zhao Y, Zhang H. Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Feb 18;9:341-50. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S56116. eCollection 2014.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NB001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id