Triage-Based Application of OFAR on the Number of Radiographs Ordered

NCT ID: NCT01779804

Last Updated: 2016-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Foot and ankle injuries account for nearly two million visits to Emergency Departments (EDs) in the United States and Canada each year. Of these injured patients, only 15% are diagnosed with actual fractures of the ankle. Due to such a small percentage, the "Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules" (OFAR) were developed, which are a set of clinical decision-making guidelines that have been shown to be effective in diagnosing ankle and foot fractures. These rules are internationally accepted by the medical community, but are inconsistently applied.

At Lehigh Valley Health Network (LVHN), the ED triage nurses are routinely trained in how to use the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules, but the rules are not always applied which may result in unnecessary X-rays. These guidelines are current network "standard of care" (usual, established care) that allow nurses to decide treatment for foot and ankle injury patients; in other words, whether to send these patients for an X-ray or not.

The research staff is conducting this study in order to find out if using these nurse-directed guidelines--on a regular and consistent basis--can decrease the number of X-rays ordered, decrease patient waiting times/length of stay (LOS) and increase patient satisfaction with their care in the ED.

STUDY PURPOSE:

The two main goals of this study are to find out if use of the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules by triage nurses can decrease the amount of X-rays ordered in the ED, as well as LOS.

Secondary study goals are to: 1) see how many X-rays are ordered by physicians and physicians' assistants after patients are evaluated by the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules as not having had a fracture; and 2) evaluate patient and provider satisfaction with the care provided both when the Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules are used and when they are not.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Variables:

This study's independent variable (or "intervention/predictor" variable) is the triage application of the OAR and OFR. Dependent variables (or "outcome" variables) include the number of X-rays ordered and LOS (co-primary outcomes), and measured patient and provider satisfaction (secondary outcomes). The Principal Investigator will create and validate his own study tool/survey to measure patient and provider satisfaction.

Confounding Variables:

Confounding variables include, but are not limited to: Patient age; patient gender; census volume on the days the study is conducted; assistance from ED staff from either site; difficulty in achieving enrollment goals in a timely fashion; season of the year (i.e., skateboarding versus skiing injuries); patient expectations about their ED care; and/or patient insurance status.

Study Design/Methods:

This study is designed to be a pilot, prospective, 2-stage study to examine the application of OAR/OFR at the 17th and Chew, and Cedar Crest site EDs that aims to determine if triage nursing application of these clinical decision rules can decrease the amount of radiographs ordered, as well as decrease patient LOS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Injuries Foot Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with foot and ankle injury

After baseline data is obtained a cohort of patients with acute foot and ankle injuries will have OFAR applied

OFAR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

OFAR

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OFAR

OFAR

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pt must be 16 years of age (patients below 18 must be assented)
* Pt must not be pregnant
* Pt must have an isolated traumatic ankle or foot injury
* Pt must be outpatients (not admitted or assigned to observation)
* Pt must be able to speak English or Spanish
* Pt must be competent and able to give consent, (not in critical condition, intoxicated or otherwise incapacitated)
* Pt must have no neurovascular (nerve/blood vessel) compromise
* Pt must have no open fracture or visible limb deformity
* Pt must not be a pediatric patient who presents with a gait abnormality of unknown origin.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pt must not be under the age of 16
* Pt must not be pregnant
* Pt must not have a non-isolated traumatic ankle or foot injury
* Pt must not be inpatients (may not be admitted or assigned to observation)
* Pt must not be unable to speak English or Spanish
* Pt must not be incompetent and unable to give consent, (in critical condition, intoxicated, or otherwise incapacitated)
* Pt must not have neurovascular (nerve/blood vessel) compromise
* Pt must not have an open fracture or visible limb deformity
* Pt must not be a pediatric patient who presents with a gait abnormality of unknown origin.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lehigh Valley Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marna Rayl Greenberg

Director of Emergency Medicine Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marna R Greenberg, DO, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lehigh Valley Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lehigh Valley Hospital and Health Network

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PR000000185

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ankle Instability Using Foot Intensive Rehabilitation
NCT04493645 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Early Mobilization After Achilles Tendon Rupture
NCT02318472 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA