Study of Regorafenib After Sorafenib in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT01774344

Last Updated: 2020-08-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

573 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-14

Study Completion Date

2019-07-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with advanced liver cancer who had progressed after sorafenib treatment. Patients were treated with regorafenib or placebo using a 2:1 randomization scheme.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regorafenib

160 mg orally (p.o.) every day (qd) for 3 weeks of every 4 week cycle (i.e. 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus BSC (Best Supportive Care)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)

Intervention Type DRUG

Regorafenib, 40 mg tablets

Placebo

4 matching placebo tablets for 3 weeks of every 4 week cycle (i.e. 3 weeks on, 1 week off) plus BSC

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablets matching in appearance

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)

Regorafenib, 40 mg tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo tablets matching in appearance

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological or cytological confirmation of HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) or non-invasive diagnosis of HCC as per American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cirrhosis
* Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage Category B or C that cannot benefit from treatments of established efficacy with higher priority such as resection, local ablation, chemoembolization or systemic sorafenib.
* Failure to prior treatment with sorafenib (defined as documented radiological progression according to the radiology charter). Randomization needs to be performed within 10 weeks after the last treatment with sorafenib.
* Tolerability of prior treatment with sorafenib defined as not less than 20 days at a minimum daily dose of 400 mg QD within the last 28 days prior to withdrawal.
* Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A. Child Pugh status should be calculated based on clinical findings and laboratory results during the screening period.

Local or loco-regional therapy of intrahepatic tumor lesions (e.g. surgery, radiation therapy, hepatic arterial embolization, chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or cryoablation) must have been completed \>/=4 weeks before first dose of study medication. Note: patients who received sole intrahepatic intraarterial chemotherapy, without lipiodol or embolizing agents are not eligible.

* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1.
* Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory tests conducted within 7 days before randomization.
* Glomerular filtration rate \>/= 30 ml/min/1.73 m\^2 according to the Modification of diet in renal disease study equation.
* At least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to RECIST (RECIST version 1.1), and modified RECIST for HCC. Tumor lesions situated in a previously irradiated area, or in an area subjected to other loco-regional therapy, may be considered measurable if there has been demonstrated progression in the lesion.
* Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
* Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception .

Exclusion Criteria

* Sorafenib treatment within 2 weeks of randomization.
* Prior systemic treatment for HCC, except sorafenib.
* Permanent discontinuation of prior sorafenib therapy due to sorafenib related toxicity.
* Known history or symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors (head CT or MRI at screening to confirm the absence of central nervous system \[CNS\] disease if patient has symptoms suggestive or consistent with CNS disease).
* Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \[BP\] \> 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management).
* Uncontrolled ascites (defined as not easily controlled with diuretic or paracentesis treatment).
* Ongoing infection \> Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE (National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v. 4.0. Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present. Hepatitis C is allowed if no antiviral treatment is required.
* Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 Grade 3 or higher within 30 days before randomization.
* Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months before the start of study medication.
* Patients unable to swallow oral medications.
* Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs and symptoms at the time of screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Graz, Styria, Austria

Site Status

Linz, Upper Austria, Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Bruxelles - Brussel, , Belgium

Site Status

La Louvière, , Belgium

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Hefei, Anhui, China

Site Status

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Nanning, Guangxi, China

Site Status

Harbin, Heilongjiang, China

Site Status

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Dalian, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clichy, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

La Tronche, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Perpignan, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Foggia, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Genoa, Liguria, Italy

Site Status

Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Novara, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy

Site Status

Pisa, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Padua, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

Chiba, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Iizuka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan

Site Status

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Musashino-shi, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Busan, Busan Gwang''yeogsi, South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland

Site Status

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil China Czechia France Germany Hungary Italy Japan Netherlands Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Switzerland Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Finn RS, Merle P, Granito A, Huang YH, Bodoky G, Pracht M, Yokosuka O, Rosmorduc O, Gerolami R, Caparello C, Cabrera R, Chang C, Sun W, LeBerre MA, Baumhauer A, Meinhardt G, Bruix J. Outcomes of sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by regorafenib for HCC: Additional analyses from the phase III RESORCE trial. J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):353-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29704513 (View on PubMed)

Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang YH, Bodoky G, Pracht M, Yokosuka O, Rosmorduc O, Breder V, Gerolami R, Masi G, Ross PJ, Song T, Bronowicki JP, Ollivier-Hourmand I, Kudo M, Cheng AL, Llovet JM, Finn RS, LeBerre MA, Baumhauer A, Meinhardt G, Han G; RESORCE Investigators. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):56-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27932229 (View on PubMed)

Wu W, Mao H, Song J, Yang F. Bibliometric analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 16;104(20):e42015. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042015.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40388796 (View on PubMed)

Teufel M, Seidel H, Kochert K, Meinhardt G, Finn RS, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Biomarkers Associated With Response to Regorafenib in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1731-1741. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.261. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30738047 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer AG products conducted in Europe.

http://clinicaltrials.bayer.com/

Click here to find results for studies related to Bayer Healthcare products.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15982

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

2012-003649-14

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimization for Regorafenib in HCC
NCT04476329 TERMINATED PHASE2