Sorafenib as Adjuvant Treatment in the Prevention Of Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (STORM)

NCT ID: NCT00692770

Last Updated: 2018-08-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-15

Study Completion Date

2014-11-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus placebo in the adjuvant treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) after potentially curative treatment (surgical resection or local ablation).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)

Participants received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (2×200 mg) orally twice daily (BID)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nexavar (Sorafenib, BAY43-9006)

Intervention Type DRUG

Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (BID)

Placebo

Participants received 2 tablets of placebo orally twice daily (BID)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo 2 tablets twice daily (BID)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nexavar (Sorafenib, BAY43-9006)

Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (BID)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo 2 tablets twice daily (BID)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have undergone surgical resection or local ablation (PEI or percutaneous or intraoperative RFA) for treatment of HCC with curative intent within 4 months from staging to potentially curative treatment. A maximum of 2 local ablation courses may be administered during this time period.
* At least 3 weeks (21 days) but no more than 7 weeks (49 days), from resection or last local ablation course, to CT/MRI scan date
* Male or female subjects \>/= 18 years of age
* Confirmation of CR (absence of residual tumor after curative treatment), on the eligibility scan by independent radiological review.
* For subjects undergoing surgical resection pathology proven complete removal of tumor.
* Intermediate or High Risk of recurrence as assessed by tumor characteristics.
* Child-Pugh score 5 -7 points. A Child-Pugh score of 7 points is allowed only in the absence of ascites.
* ECOG Performance Status of 0.
* Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function

Exclusion Criteria

* Recurrent HCC
* Child-Pugh score 7 points with presence of ascites.
* Low risk of recurrence after curative treatment
* History of cardiovascular disease
* History of HIV infection
* Active clinically serious infections (\> grade 2 NCI-CTCAE version 3.0)
* Subjects with seizure disorder requiring medication (such as steroids or anti-epileptics)
* Subjects with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis
* Subjects undergoing renal dialysis
* Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from the cancer being evaluated in this study EXCEPT cervical carcinoma in situ, treated basal cell carcinoma, superficial bladder tumors \[Ta, Tis \& T1\] or any cancer curatively treated \> 3 years prior to study entry as defined by the signing of informed consent..
* Uncontrolled ascites (defined as not easily controlled with diuretic treatment)
* Encephalopathy
* History of GI bleeding within 30 days of randomization.
* Subjects with a history of esophageal varices bleeding which has not been followed by effective therapy and/or treatment to prevent bleeding recurrence.
* Prior anti cancer therapy for treatment of HCC (including sorafenib or any other molecular therapy) is excluded.
* Major surgery within 4 weeks of start of study as defined by the signing of informed consent, except for surgical resection or local ablation of HCC.
* Investigational drug therapy outside of this trial during or within 4 weeks of study entry, as defined by the signing of informed consent.
* Liver transplantation, this includes patients on a transplant list with the intention to transplant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Providence Portland Medical Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Bruxelles - Brussel, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Reñaca, Región de Valparaíso, Chile

Site Status

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Nanning, Guangxi, China

Site Status

Wuhan, Hubei, China

Site Status

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Beijng, , China

Site Status

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Dalian, , China

Site Status

Hefei, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bondy, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Homburg/Saar, Saarland, Germany

Site Status

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Athens / Greece, , Greece

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Kwun Tong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Shatin, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Bari, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Benevento, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy

Site Status

Catania, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Palermo, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Padua, Veneto, Italy

Site Status

Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Suita, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Tokushima, , Japan

Site Status

México, D.F., Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

México, D.F., , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Goyang-si, Gyeonggido, South Korea

Site Status

Goyang-si, Gyeonggido, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Jeollabuk-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Cruces/Barakaldo, Bilbao, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain

Site Status

Badajoz, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile China France Germany Greece Hong Kong Italy Japan Mexico New Zealand Portugal Romania Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26361969 (View on PubMed)

Pinyol R, Montal R, Bassaganyas L, Sia D, Takayama T, Chau GY, Mazzaferro V, Roayaie S, Lee HC, Kokudo N, Zhang Z, Torrecilla S, Moeini A, Rodriguez-Carunchio L, Gane E, Verslype C, Croitoru AE, Cillo U, de la Mata M, Lupo L, Strasser S, Park JW, Camps J, Sole M, Thung SN, Villanueva A, Pena C, Meinhardt G, Bruix J, Llovet JM. Molecular predictors of prevention of recurrence in HCC with sorafenib as adjuvant treatment and prognostic factors in the phase 3 STORM trial. Gut. 2019 Jun;68(6):1065-1075. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316408. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30108162 (View on PubMed)

Bouattour M, Soubrane O, de Gramont A, Faivre S. Adjuvant therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: moving forward from the STORM. Trials. 2016 Nov 25;17(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1675-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27887632 (View on PubMed)

Kudo M. Adjuvant therapy after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology. 2011;81 Suppl 1:50-5. doi: 10.1159/000333259. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22212936 (View on PubMed)

Printz C. Clinical trials of note. Sorafenib as adjuvant treatment in the prevention of disease recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (STORM). Cancer. 2009 Oct 15;115(20):4646. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24673. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19806596 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in Europe

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001087-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

12414

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.