Sorafenib and Micro-therapy Guided by Primovist Enhanced MRI in Patients With Inoperable Liver Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01126645

Last Updated: 2019-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

529 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate Sorafenib and local microtherapy guided by Primovist enhanced MRI in patients with inoperable liver cancer (HCC).

Methodology:

Patients with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma will receive either:

* local ablation therapy of liver lesions by radiofrequency ablation followed by sorafenib or placebo (local ablation group), or
* radioembolization (SIRT) + sorafenib or sorafenib alone (palliative treatment group).

In each study group, patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment arms following a pre-defined randomization plan. Randomization will be on a 1:1 basis in the local ablation group and on the basis of 10 (sorafenib only) : 11 (SIRT + sorafenib) in the palliative treatment group.

Patients in the local ablation group will be followed at 2 months intervals for recurrence and overall survival, patients in the palliative treatment group will be followed for overall survival. Follow-up in each study group will end 24 months after inclusion of the last patient into the respective study group.

The assignment of patients to the local ablation or palliative study group will be based on the ablative potential of RFA (local ablation if ≤4 tumors, each ≤5 cm in size). Diagnostic imaging will be used to guide this decision. The assignment to the local ablation or the palliative treatment group will be made by the local investigator.

As a sub-study, all patients will undergo Primovist®-enhanced MRI in addition to contrast-enhanced CT before assignment to one treatment group. The goal of the sub-study is to assess the value of Primovist®-enhanced MRI to correctly stratify patients for a local ablation or palliative treatment strategy. Primovist®-enhanced MRI will be compared with contrast-enhanced multislice CT using a truth panel assessment as the standard of reference. In addition, Primovist-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT will be obtained during follow-up of patients in the local ablation group to assess its potential for detection of recurrence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

local ablation group

Local ablation group: Potentially curative treatment of early HCC includes surgical resection and local ablation (RFA, PEI, BT). Recurrence rates after such approaches are reported to amount to 50% at 3 years and 70% at 5 years. Tumor recurrence may be either due to de novo development of new primary tumors or due to intrahepatic (unrecognized) metastases. Prevention of recurrence after local ablation is an important strategy to improve overall survival. So far, adjuvant chemoembolization and chemotherapy have not proven to be effective in preventing recurrences. There is, however, a strong rationale to assume that sorafenib will be of value in the adjuvant treatment of HCC as sorafenib has a dual mechanism of action (inhibition of tumor proliferation and antiangiogenesis) and has proven efficacy in HCC.

Group Type OTHER

RFA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A max.of 2 percutaneous RFA sessions is permitted per patient with a max.of 2 liver lesions treated in each RFA session. Randomization to sorafenib or placebo is performed after completion of RFA. Percutaneous RFA is to be performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and following as far as possible routine procedures of the participating hospital. Typically, RFA will be performed under conscious sedation, general anesthesia is permitted. After local anesthesia of the site of puncture, the applicator is positioned in the center of the lesion using ultrasound-, CT- or MR-guidance. The success of ablation is to be controlled directly after RFA using ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, or MR imaging. If for any reason RFA is deemed incomplete within the immediate follow-up (up to 2 weeks after the initial ablation), RFA is to be repeated once (in this case, the total (max.) number of RFA sessions will be three).

The study procedure guide will contain further instructions for RFA.

palliative treatment group

Radioembolization has been reported to be effective in patients with unresectable HCC with preserved liver function from a number of trials. Successful downstaging of disease rendering patients eligible for potentially curative therapies, and even histologically confirmed complete responses of unresectable HCC, have repeatedly been reported providing the rationale to evaluate SIRT+sorafenib in comparison to sorafenib alone.

The impact of cirrhosis as a concomitant disease in most patients with HCC is that it limits the ability of many patients to tolerate chemotherapy and is an independent cause of death in HCC patients. Thus, the historical difficulty in demonstrating an effect of therapy on survival in patients with advanced-stage, unresectable HCC (the majority). A new therapy that is effective in controlling hepatic disease, is less toxic than traditional chemotherapy, and improves the quality of life for patients in the advanced stages of HCC could represent an alternative.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radioembolization (SIRT)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One SIRT prescription consists of the pre-treatment assessment followed by one or 2 treatment sessions The aim of pre-treatment assessment is to ensure delivery of the microspheres to the target. Evaluation includes a determination of the arterial location and any consequent necessity for coil-embolization of the gastroduodenal artery, right gastric artery and any other accessory arteries to prevent inadvertent administration of microspheres into the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas. In addition, parasitic extrahepatic supply should be coil-embolized.

Patients in whom the shunt fraction indicates potential exposure to the lung to an absorbed radiation dose of more than 30 Gy should be excluded from treatment with SIR-Spheres. Patients who are randomized to receive SIRT but who are not regarded as eligible for SIRT after the pre-treatment assessment will be switched to the sorafenib only group within the palliative treatment arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RFA

A max.of 2 percutaneous RFA sessions is permitted per patient with a max.of 2 liver lesions treated in each RFA session. Randomization to sorafenib or placebo is performed after completion of RFA. Percutaneous RFA is to be performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and following as far as possible routine procedures of the participating hospital. Typically, RFA will be performed under conscious sedation, general anesthesia is permitted. After local anesthesia of the site of puncture, the applicator is positioned in the center of the lesion using ultrasound-, CT- or MR-guidance. The success of ablation is to be controlled directly after RFA using ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, or MR imaging. If for any reason RFA is deemed incomplete within the immediate follow-up (up to 2 weeks after the initial ablation), RFA is to be repeated once (in this case, the total (max.) number of RFA sessions will be three).

The study procedure guide will contain further instructions for RFA.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Radioembolization (SIRT)

One SIRT prescription consists of the pre-treatment assessment followed by one or 2 treatment sessions The aim of pre-treatment assessment is to ensure delivery of the microspheres to the target. Evaluation includes a determination of the arterial location and any consequent necessity for coil-embolization of the gastroduodenal artery, right gastric artery and any other accessory arteries to prevent inadvertent administration of microspheres into the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas. In addition, parasitic extrahepatic supply should be coil-embolized.

Patients in whom the shunt fraction indicates potential exposure to the lung to an absorbed radiation dose of more than 30 Gy should be excluded from treatment with SIR-Spheres. Patients who are randomized to receive SIRT but who are not regarded as eligible for SIRT after the pre-treatment assessment will be switched to the sorafenib only group within the palliative treatment arm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sorafenib (Nexavar 200 mg film-coated tablets),marketing authorization no.:EU/1/06/342/001 SIR Spheres Microspheres Sorafenib (Nexavar)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: 18-85 years
2. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
3. If primary diagnosis of HCC: diagnosis based on the following criteria:

1. cyto-histological criteria, OR
2. radiological criteria: Focal lesion \>1 cm with arterial hypervascularization in 2 coincident imaging techniques (CT, MRI, or US), OR
3. combined criteria: one imaging technique showing a focal lesion 1-2 cm with arterial hypervascularization AND AFP levels \>400 ng/mL, OR
4. combined criteria: one imaging technique showing a focal lesion \>2 cm with arterial hypervascularization AND AFP levels \>200 ng/mL
4. If extrahepatic metastases: liver-dominant disease
5. Stage BCLC A, B, or C
6. Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B up to 7 points (in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy: Child-Pugh score up to 5 points; INR category not regarded for calculation of the Child-Pugh score)
7. Willing to comply with all study procedures
8. Has voluntarily given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. If female, pregnant or breast feeding (females of child-bearing potential must use adequate contraception and must have a negative pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to inclusion into this study)
2. If male, not using adequate birth control measures
3. One or more of the following:

* Hemoglobin \<10g/dL,
* WBC \<2,500 cells/mm3,
* ANC \<1,500 cells/mm3,
* platelets \<50,000/mm3,
* ECOG performance status \>2
4. Life expectancy \<16 weeks or medically unstable
5. Extrahepatic metastases (except metastases to bone, lymph nodes, and adrenal glands which do not constitute an exclusion criterion), but, see Additional Criteria for the Local Ablation Group, below (Section 4.2 of the study protocol)
6. Patients with known GFR \<30 mL/min/1.73m2
7. PT-INR/PTT \>1.5 times the upper limit of normal (patients on anticoagulation therapy will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence exists of an underlying abnormality in anticoagulation)
8. Uncontrolled infections at the time of microtherapy
9. Child-Pugh score \>7 points; in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy: Child-Pugh score \>5 points (INR category not regarded for calculation of the Child-Pugh score)
10. Uncontrolled ascites
11. Tumor load of the whole liver \>70%
12. Contraindications for study medications according to product labeling or procedures (sorafenib, Primovist®, x-ray contrast agents, SIR-Spheres®, RFA, MWA, MRI, CT) incl. any contraindication to the transarterial interventional procedure (e.g., allergy against x-ray contrast agents, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism)
13. Prior resection of the papilla of Vater (e.g., Whipple procedure) or bile duct stent across the papilla
14. Significant cardiovascular disease; e.g., myocardial infarction within 6 months of inclusion, chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), unstable coronary artery disease
15. Uncontrolled hypertension
16. Thrombotic or embolic events including transient ischemic attacks within the past 6 months (tumor-related portal vein thrombosis allowed in the palliative part of the trial).
17. History of GI bleeding within 30 days before inclusion into this study
18. History of esophageal varices bleeding which has not been controlled by effective therapy and/or therapy to prevent bleeding recurrence
19. Previous malignancy other than carcinoma in situ of the skin or the cervix uteri within 5 years prior to inclusion
20. History of organ transplant (including prior liver transplantation)
21. HIV, congenital immune defect, any immunosuppressive therapy for autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis) or inflammatory bowel disease
22. Mental conditions rendering the subject incapable to understand the nature, scope, and consequences of the trial
23. Close affiliation with the investigational site; e.g. first-degree relative of the investigator
24. Participating in another therapeutic clinical trial or has completed study participation in another therapeutic clinical trial within 30 days of enrolment into this trial
25. Having been previously enrolled in this clinical trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sirtex Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Magdeburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jens Ricke

Prof. Dr. Jens Ricke, University Hospital Munich

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jens Ricke, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital Munich

Peter Malfertheiner, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Magdeburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Seidensticker M, Ocal O, Schutte K, Malfertheiner P, Berg T, Loewe C, Klumpen HJ, van Delden O, Umutlu MR, Ben Khaled N, de Toni EN, Seidensticker R, Aghdassi A, Tran A, Bronowicki JP, Peynircioglu B, Sangro B, Pech M, Ricke J. Impact of adjuvant sorafenib treatment after local ablation for HCC in the phase II SORAMIC trial. JHEP Rep. 2023 Feb 15;5(5):100699. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100699. eCollection 2023 May.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36968218 (View on PubMed)

Ricke J, Schinner R, Seidensticker M, Gasbarrini A, van Delden OM, Amthauer H, Peynircioglu B, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, De Toni EN, Malfertheiner P, Pech M, Sangro B. Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2021 Dec;75(6):1387-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34454995 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.soramic.com

web page of SORAMIC clinical trial

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT No. 2009-012576-27

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MRI-guided Holmium-166 Radioembolization
NCT05609448 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA