A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CMX001 for the Prevention of CMV Infection in CMV-seropositive HCT Recipients

NCT ID: NCT01769170

Last Updated: 2021-07-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

452 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study compared the effectiveness of oral brincidofovir (BCV) to placebo for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in stem cell transplant patients who were CMV seropositive but negative for CMV viremia before starting treatment with BCV.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group multicenter study of oral brincidofovir (BCV) in approximately 450 cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive subjects who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). The study consisted of a screening evaluation and a treatment phase of 10 to 14 weeks. Dosing with the study drug (BCV or placebo) was initiated as soon as individual subjects could ingest tablets after transplant but no later than Day 28 post-transplant, and was continued through Week 14. All randomized subjects remained on study and followed the same scheduled study treatment. Study assessments were performed weekly from randomization through completion of the first post-treatment follow-up assessment at Week 15, and every 3 weeks thereafter through Week 24.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CMV

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Matching placebo administered orally twice weekly

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Brincidofovir

100 mg brincidofovir administered orally twice weekly

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Brincidofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Brincidofovir

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BCV CMX001 Hexadecyloxypropyl cidofovir HDP-CDV

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects were required to meet all of the following criteria, as applicable, to be eligible to participate in this study:

1. Were allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients who had prior evidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) exposure (CMV-seropositive) before transplantation and were CMV viremia negative at screening and at any other assessments performed prior to the first dose of study drug.
2. Were aged ≥18 years.
3. If male, were willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method(s) throughout the duration of his participation in the study, i.e., through Week 24, when engaging in sexual intercourse with a female subject of childbearing potential.
4. If female of childbearing potential, i.e., not postmenopausal or surgically sterile, were willing to use 2 acceptable contraceptive methods, 1 of which must have been a barrier method, throughout the duration of her participation in the study, i.e., through Week 24, when engaging in sexual intercourse with a nonsterile male partner.
5. Were able to begin study drug dosing within 28 days following the qualifying HCT.
6. Were able to comfortably ingest and absorb oral medication (in the judgment of the investigator and base don lack of significant gastrointestinal events/medical history).
7. Were willing and able to understand and provide written informed consent.
8. Were willing and able to participate in all required study activities for the entire duration of the study (i.e., through Week 24).

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects who met any of the following criteria, as applicable, were not eligible to participate in this study:

1. Was pregnant or planned to become pregnant during the anticipated duration of her participation in the study (i.e., through Week 24), or was nursing a child.
2. Had a positive CMV viremia test (at the designated central virology laboratory or a local virology laboratory) at any time between transplant and the first dose of study drug.
3. Weighed ≥120 kg (\~265 lbs).
4. Had hypersensitivity (not renal dysfunction or eye disorder) to cidofovir (CDV), brincidofovir (BCV), or its excipients.
5. Had received (or were anticipated to need treatment with) any of the following:

* Ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, intravenous CDV, or any other anti-CMV therapy (including CMV immune globulin, cell-based therapies, and investigational anti-CMV drugs, e.g., leflunomide, letermovir, or maribavir) at any time post-transplant;
* Any anti-CMV vaccine at any time;
* Any other investigation drug within 14 days prior to the first dose of study drug (unless prior approval had been received from the Chimerix medical monitor or designee); or
* Prior treatment with BCV at any time.
6. Were receiving of the following drugs on the first dose of study drug or were anticipated to receive any of these drugs at the doses described after the first dose of study drug:

* Acyclovir orally at \>2000 mg total daily dose (TDD) or intravenously at \>15 mg/kg TDD;
* Valaciclovir at \>3000 mg TDD; or
* Leflunomide at any dose.
7. Were receiving digoxin or ketoconazole (other than topical formulations) at the first dose of study drug or were anticipated to need treatment with either digoxin or ketoconazole during the treatment phase (through Week 14).
8. Had possible, probably, or definitive CMV disease diagnosed within 6 months prior to first dose of study drug.
9. Were infected with HIV (based on serology), or had an active hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, as evidence by detectable plasma HCV RNA or HBV DNA, respectively.
10. Had received another allogeneic HCT (i.e., other than the qualifying HCT) within 2 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
11. Had renal insufficiency, as evidence by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<15 mL/min or required renal dialysis.
12. Had hepatic abnormalities as evidence by a screening of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \>5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN), as reported by the central safety laboratory.
13. Had a screening total bilirubin \>2 x the ULN and direct bilirubin \>1.5 x the ULN, as reported by the central safety laboratory.
14. Had active solid tumor malignancies with the exception of basal cell carcinoma or the underlying condition necessitating HCT (e.g., lymphomas).
15. Had Stage 2 or higher graft versus host disease of the gut or any other GI disease that would have, in the judgment of the investigator, precluded the subject from taking or absorbing oral medication (e.g., clinically active Crohn's disease, ischemic colitis, moderate or severe ulcerative colitis, small bowel resection, ileus, or any condition expected to require abdominal surgery during the course of study participation).
16. Had any other condition, including abnormal laboratory values, that would have, in the judgement of the investigator, put the subject at increased risk by participating in the study or would have interfered with the conduct or planned analyses of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Diego-Moores Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Blood Cancer Institute

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

University of Miami Hospital

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute-Emory

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northside Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Universit of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Beth Isreal Decaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Womens Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Harper University Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Mt. Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical College/NY Presbyterial Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Levine Cancer Institute/Carolinas Health

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke Cancer Institute

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Jewish Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Western Pennsylvania Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hollings Cancer Center

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Healthcare of San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Healthcare

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sart Tilman Liege

Brussels, Liege, Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marty FM, Winston DJ, Chemaly RF, Mullane KM, Shore TB, Papanicolaou GA, Chittick G, Brundage TM, Wilson C, Morrison ME, Foster SA, Nichols WG, Boeckh MJ; SUPPRESS Trial Clinical Study Group. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Oral Brincidofovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Feb;25(2):369-381. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30292744 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMX001-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.