Intranasal Fentanyl for Management of Pain Associated With Cystoscopic Procedures
NCT ID: NCT01756651
Last Updated: 2017-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2016-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Usefulness of Dexmedetomidine on Post-operative Pain Management in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis
NCT01195116
Premedication With Oral Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Rigid Cystoscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
NCT00563069
Safety & Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl & Midazolam in the Pediatric Emergency Room
NCT05057689
Comparing Fetoscopic Surgery Protocols
NCT05654064
Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Low Dose Hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine
NCT05993975
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intranasal Fentanyl 100mcg
fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100mcg
Fentanyl pectin
comparison of Intranasal fentanyl 100mcg vs 200 mcg.
Intranasal Fentanyl 200mcg
fentanyl pectin nasal spray 200mcg
Fentanyl pectin
comparison of Intranasal fentanyl 100mcg vs 200 mcg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fentanyl pectin
comparison of Intranasal fentanyl 100mcg vs 200 mcg.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Allergy to fentanyl or to any of the components of Lazanda®
3. Acute/chronic nasal problems such as rhinitis or sinusitis
4. Acute bronchial asthma / upper airway obstruction
5. Presence of bradycardia or history of seizures
6. Concomitant use of drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (e.g., ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, troleandomycin, clarithromycin, nelfinavir, nefazodone, amprenavir, aprepitant, diltiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, fosamprenavir, monoamine oxidase inhibitors and verapamil) or exposure to these drugs 30 days prior to placement on the study.
7. Concomitant use of vasoconstrictive nasal decongestants (e.g., oxymetazoline, phenylephrine, xylometazoline)
8. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score more than 0 at baseline
9. Any situation or condition which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, or could confound the study results.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Depomed
INDUSTRY
Richard C Reznichek, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Richard C Reznichek, MD
Medical Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard Reznichek, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urology Clinic, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Patel AR, Jones JS, Babineau D. Lidocaine 2% gel versus plain lubricating gel for pain reduction during flexible cystoscopy: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, controlled trials. J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):986-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.065. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
Taghizadeh AK, El Madani A, Gard PR, Li CY, Thomas PJ, Denyer SP. When does it hurt? Pain during flexible cystoscopy in men. Urol Int. 2006;76(4):301-3. doi: 10.1159/000092051.
Calleary JG, Masood J, Van-Mallaerts R, Barua JM. Nitrous oxide inhalation to improve patient acceptance and reduce procedure related pain of flexible cystoscopy for men younger than 55 years. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):184-8; discussion 188. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.036. Epub 2007 May 17.
Song YS, Song ES, Kim KJ, Park YH, Ku JH. Midazolam anesthesia during rigid and flexible cystoscopy. Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0091-7. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
Hruby G, Ames C, Chen C, Yan Y, Sagar J, Baron P, Landman J. Assessment of efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain management during office-based flexible cystoscopy. Urology. 2006 May;67(5):914-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.043.
Striebel HW, Koenigs D, Kramer J. Postoperative pain management by intranasal demand-adapted fentanyl titration. Anesthesiology. 1992 Aug;77(2):281-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199208000-00010.
Striebel HW, Pommerening J, Rieger A. Intranasal fentanyl titration for postoperative pain management in an unselected population. Anaesthesia. 1993 Sep;48(9):753-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07583.x.
Striebel HW, Olmann T, Spies C, Brummer G. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) for the management of postoperative pain: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00167-0.
Striebel HW, Oelmann T, Spies C, Rieger A, Schwagmeier R. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: a method for noninvasive postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 1996 Sep;83(3):548-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199609000-00019.
Striebel HW, Kramer J, Luhmann I, Rohierse-Hohler I, Rieger A. [Pharmacokinetics of intranasal Fentanyl.]. Schmerz. 1993 Jun;7(2):122-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02527870. No abstract available. German.
Toussaint S, Maidl J, Schwagmeier R, Striebel HW. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief. Can J Anaesth. 2000 Apr;47(4):299-302. doi: 10.1007/BF03020941.
Saunders M, Adelgais K, Nelson D. Use of intranasal fentanyl for the relief of pediatric orthopedic trauma pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;17(11):1155-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00905.x.
Borland M, Jacobs I, King B, O'Brien D. A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
Borland ML, Bergesio R, Pascoe EM, Turner S, Woodger S. Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study. Burns. 2005 Nov;31(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
Foster D, Upton R, Christrup L, Popper L. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal versus intravenous fentanyl in patients with pain after oral surgery. Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1380-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L168. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
Christrup LL, Foster D, Popper LD, Troen T, Upton R. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of fentanyl following intranasal versus intravenous administration in adults undergoing third-molar extraction: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-way, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):469-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.001.
Fuhr U. Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance. Drug Saf. 1998 Apr;18(4):251-72. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818040-00002.
Baele P, Kestens-Servaye Y, Goenen M. MAOI and cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jun;40(6):579-80. doi: 10.1007/BF03009749. No abstract available.
Gillman PK. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):434-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei210. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
Noble WH, Baker A. MAO inhibitors and coronary artery surgery: a patient death. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Dec;39(10):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03008376.
Dale O, Hjortkjaer R, Kharasch ED. Nasal administration of opioids for pain management in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):759-70. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460702.x.
Fisher A, Watling M, Smith A, Knight A. Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 microg in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):860-7. doi: 10.5414/cpp48860.
Hansen MS, Mathiesen O, Trautner S, Dahl JB. Intranasal fentanyl in the treatment of acute pain--a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Apr;56(4):407-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02613.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
Panagiotou I, Mystakidou K. Intranasal fentanyl: from pharmacokinetics and bioavailability to current treatment applications. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Jul;10(7):1009-21. doi: 10.1586/era.10.77.
Prommer E, Thompson L. Intranasal fentanyl for pain control: current status with a focus on patient considerations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Mar 18;5:157-64. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S7665.
Kress HG, Oronska A, Kaczmarek Z, Kaasa S, Colberg T, Nolte T. Efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl spray 50 to 200 microg for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer: a phase III, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with a 10-month, open-label extension treatment period. Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1177-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.022.
Mercadante S, Radbruch L, Davies A, Poulain P, Sitte T, Perkins P, Colberg T, Camba MA. A comparison of intranasal fentanyl spray with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2805-15. doi: 10.1185/03007990903336135.
Chung F. Discharge criteria--a new trend. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Nov;42(11):1056-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011083.
Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20812-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.