Objective and Subjective Outcomes of an Electronic Chest Drainage System
NCT ID: NCT01747889
Last Updated: 2016-03-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Furthermore, we aim to determine whether the use of a digital chest drainage system compared with a traditional system increases the total distance of ambulation in the first 48 hours after thoracic surgery and affects overall patient satisfaction in the peri-operative period.
Finally, we want to determine whether the aforementioned outcomes relative to the chest tube drainage systems differ in different parts of the world.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems
NCT03536130
Evaluation of the Lung Nodule Sensitivity of Stationary Chest Tomosynthesis in Patients With Known Lung Nodules
NCT02075320
Evaluation of the Contribution of a DEMaterialized VIdeo-pedagogical SUpport in the Care Pathway of Lung Cancer Surgery Patients
NCT06577844
PDL-1 Expression on Circulating Tumor Cells in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02827344
Evaluating the Pulmonary Nodule With Imaging and Biomarkers
NCT01739881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic system
patients managed with an electronic chest drainage system
electronic chest drainage system
Patients in the intervention arm are connected to Thopaz, electronic drainage system immediately after closure of the chest, patients in the control group are connected to a traditional system. Chest tubes in both groups are then connected to suction of -20 cmH2O and maintained at that level until post-operative day #1.
On the morning of post-operative day #1, presence of air leak will be recorded on suction. Then, suction will be decreased to -8 cmH2O (so-called water seal). At that time, management of chest tube drainage and decision for chest tube removal will be dictated by clinical signs, symptoms, and surgeon preference following the standard clinical algorithm for post-operative care of general thoracic patients
traditional system
patients managed with a traditional analogue chest drainage system
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
electronic chest drainage system
Patients in the intervention arm are connected to Thopaz, electronic drainage system immediately after closure of the chest, patients in the control group are connected to a traditional system. Chest tubes in both groups are then connected to suction of -20 cmH2O and maintained at that level until post-operative day #1.
On the morning of post-operative day #1, presence of air leak will be recorded on suction. Then, suction will be decreased to -8 cmH2O (so-called water seal). At that time, management of chest tube drainage and decision for chest tube removal will be dictated by clinical signs, symptoms, and surgeon preference following the standard clinical algorithm for post-operative care of general thoracic patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age range of 18-90 years
3. Patients undergoing a segmentectomy, lobectomy, or bilobectomy. Both open and minimally invasive (thoracoscopic or robotic) resections are acceptable.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Redo thoracotomies
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Yale University
OTHER
Ospedali Riuniti Ancona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cecilia Pompili
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cecilia Pompili, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedali Riuniti Ancona
Ancona, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pompili C, Detterbeck F, Papagiannopoulos K, Sihoe A, Vachlas K, Maxfield MW, Lim HC, Brunelli A. Multicenter international randomized comparison of objective and subjective outcomes between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):490-6; discussion 496-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PATSAT-2012-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.