Anterior Shoulder US - a New Access

NCT ID: NCT01746966

Last Updated: 2014-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Investigate Gleno-Humeral Joint (GHJ) by anterior approach:

A - Measurement of GHJ thickness at 3 points and average value calculation on body supine position and with arm supinated, maximal externally rotated with elbow angle 90 degrees
* By longitudinal access with transducer position laterally to coracoids along to the GHJ line, located as diagonal form lower to forward and lateral direction with demonstration the joint cartilage posteriorly and subscapular tendon anteriorly (Fig.4)
* By transversal access with 90 degrees to longitudinal and at 3 points: upper with coracoids visualization, middle and lower (Fig.5-7).

B - Measurement of rotator interval with assessment of width and higher.
2. Comparison of the data with results of classic values have been received by posterior and inferior (axillar) approach.
3. Comparison of the results between patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and healthy controls

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

US scan was shown to be effective and useful for investigation of shoulder diseases. It is easy to implement and return, not expensive and not invasive, and precise for assessment. Glenohumeral joint is most inspected in elderly population. Most of shoulder syndromes are not related to joint diseases, but to adjacent tissue problem. However, US is preferred method for assessment GHJ by rheumatologists. But inflammatory changes in GHJ found limited attention in medical imaging literature. So far there is assessment of GHJ synovitis with disclosure of synovial fluid and pannus in subdeltoid (subacromial) bursa and biceps tendon, connected to GHJ space, by axillar and posterior access. Subdeltoid bursitis and biceps tenosynovitis are common used for inflammatory assessment of the shoulder. Anterior approach for GHJ assessment has not been used before our last trial. A problem of patients with synovitis in GHJ is difficulties to pick up shoulder to lateral side (abduction) till 90 degrees for axillar approach. We proposed anterior access for GHJ synovitis assessment. Certain position of the shoulder and measured data of healthy controls enabled diagnostic of GHJ synovitis with minimal movement of ill shoulder. In other report we showed US differences between GHJ and subscapular tendon on the anterior approach. These two publications showed anterior shoulder US in sitting position with arm externally rotated and supinated. We should recognize problems of these trials related to wrong identification of GHJ space. As we realized later this incorrect detection was associated with missing two orienteer structures: GHJ cartilage located behind and subcscapular tendon situated forward to GHJ space. From our present view, these two criteria are corn stone for GHJ visualization. Because lack obvious picture of these 2 structures GHJ demonstration is unclear and exposed to confusion with subscapular tendon. Moreover, our further experience of multiple anterior US studies showed that presentation of GHJ in position for supination and external rotation in sitting position is associated with poor visualization of GHJ cavity. The reason is position of GHJ to be hidden behind humeral head due to differences between round humeral head and oval glenoid and twist GHJ structure forward-upper-laterally. Daily practice helped to resolve the problem. We found: a patient should be laid down supine, his elbow is bent to 90 degrees and the shoulder is rotated maximally externally. This condition is associated to fix shoulder girdle, glenoid move anteriorly, humeral head move posteriorly, and much more complete external shoulder rotation is achieved opening GHJ for investigation. Shoulder CT shows that glenoid surface is in plane open to upper, forward and lateral side. It obligates to turn of transducer according to direction of investigated joint placed along the glenoid surface. That means, longitudinal study of GHJ requests transducer position under certain angle along to joint line. Transversal study is implemented under angle 90 degree to the joint line. Other problem is that synovitis may developed at early stage only within limited region of the joint and in region much more susceptible to inflammation and dilatation, like that rotator interval: anterior upper region which is covered only by the joint capsule with lower resistance to distention. That region is referred as rotator interval, a distance between supraspinatus (laterally) and subcapularis (medially) tendons attachment, when shoulder supinated and externally rotated. This region has been recently used for synovial biopsy.

Materials and methods:

US will be performed for 20 healthy controls and 20 patients with RA. US scan will be fulfilled symmetric both sides. Diagnosis RA is relied on anamnesis data, physical examination, and laboratory findings. Synovial swelling, synovial tenderness, local fever of joint region, active and passive limitation, accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) upper 40mm/hr (N\<12), C reactive protein (CRP) upper 1.5mg/dl (N\<0.5) were clinical signs of active inflammation. Twenty healthy controls did not complain of shoulder pain and limitation and their physical examination was unremarkable.

Study process:

US scan will be performed as prospective study for 20 healthy controls from department of preventive medicine and for 20 patients with RA age of 20-60 by to classic approaches: posterior and inferior and new anterior access. The last was accompanied by measurement of GHJ space and rotator interval in upper limb position of supination and external rotation. Comparison will be implemented between data of different positions and RA patients compared with controls.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

20 patients age of 20-60 with Rheumatoid Arthritis according to ARA 1987 revised criteria and disease activity Disease Activity Score (DAS) 3-5

No interventions assigned to this group

Healthy controls participants

Healthy controls age of 20-60 according to conclusion of preventive medicine department

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Healthy controls age of 20-60 according to conclusion of preventive medicine department
2. Patients with RA according to ARA 1987 revised criteria and disease activity DAS 3-5

Exclusion Criteria

1. Past shoulder trauma
2. Shoulder osteoarthritis
3. Rotator cuff disorders
4. Shoulder injections
5. Cervical spondylosis with nerve root compression, Cervical symptomatic disc syndromes
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rambam Health Care Campus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexander Rozin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rambam Health Care Campus and Technion

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rheumatology unit

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alexander Rozin, MD

Role: CONTACT

972-48542268

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexander Rozin, MD

Role: primary

972-48542268

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0260-10CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation
NCT07292740 NOT_YET_RECRUITING