Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study
NCT ID: NCT05868148
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-20
2035-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* What is the average improvement in patient-reported shoulder function after 2 years when compared to before the surgery, and
* What is the rate of surgical revisions needed over a 10 year period
Patients will be asked to will be asked to regularly attend their check-up visits with their surgeon (including having x-rays or CT images taken to check their shoulder and implant), to complete questionnaires to report how their shoulder is doing, and to tell their surgeon when they notice any changes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing The Outcome of Large-Diameter vs Small-Diameter Glenospheres in Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
NCT02768597
Comparison of Glenoid Component Position Using Intelligent Reusable Instrument (IRI) vs Standard Surgical Instruments
NCT01801241
Study Comparing Patient Function and Satisfaction With Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression Before and After Repair of Complete Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT01430598
Clinical Study Evaluating Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With SMR Stemless
NCT04529798
Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Data Collection
NCT03404778
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of this multicenter study is to collect clinical data at baseline, surgery, immediate post-op, and annually through 10 years post-operation, on related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid, to demonstrate safety and performance of these implants in a real-world setting.
The primary outcome measure is the average improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score from baseline to 24 months.
Secondary outcome measures include the following assessments to be evaluated throughout the patient's participation in the study:
* Constant Score (years 1, 2, 5 and 10 only)
* Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score
* Patient Satisfaction
* EQ-5D-5L
Radiologic imaging: Patient images (X-ray or CT) completed at baseline and in-person follow-ups will be analyzed for standard radiographic findings, including, but not limited to: device migration, component breakage, radiolucencies and bone characteristics.
Revision rate and survivorship will be assessed annually and at any time upon request for regulatory purposes such as PMCF or Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) updates. The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations will be reported as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survival.
Adverse events will be evaluated from inclusion to last follow-up and will be documented during the study and categorized as whether they are serious and whether they are related to the Sponsor device or implant procedure.
During the study, patients will undergo the following procedures, which are standard of care:
* Patient information and Consent (as applicable per local regulation),
* Inclusion/non-inclusion criteria,
* Demography, Height \& Weight,
* Surgical history and relevant medical history,
* Physician exams (Range of Motion and Strength measurements),
* Patient questionnaires (ASES, Constant, SANE, Patient Satisfaction, EQ-5D-5L),
* Shoulder study implant \& surgery related data,
* CT scans, x-rays
* AE / SAE collection (continuous recording).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Shoulder iD device implant
Adult patients who have reached skeletal maturity, with a functional deltoid muscle, and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear within one or more indications and zero contraindications who will receive the Shoulder iD Primary Reversed Glenoid device to replace the shoulder joint.
Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid
Device implant via reversed total shoulder arthroplasty
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid
Device implant via reversed total shoulder arthroplasty
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed and willing to sign an informed consent form approved by IRB or EC (when applicable).
* Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
* Considered a candidate for shoulder arthroplasty using a study device.
* Meets indications for use requirements or other local, regional, or geographic specific regulatory requirements
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient belongs to a vulnerable group of patients, including minor patients, those unable to decide for themselves to participate or needing a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR), or others who could be subject to coercion (patients who may not be acting on their own initiative) (referred to as a "vulnerable subject" in section 3.44 of the ISO 14155:2020).
* Active local or systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis
* Poor bone quality, where there could be considerable migration of the prothesis and/or a chance of fracture of the humerus or glenoid (reassessed at time of surgery)
* Significant injury to the brachial plexus
* Inadequate bone stock in the proximal humerus or glenoid fossa for supporting the device components
* Neuromuscular disease (e.g., joint neuropathy) Known allergy to one of the product materials
* Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Stryker Trauma and Extremities
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rebecca Gibson
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Stryker Trauma and Extremities
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSF
San Francisco, California, United States
Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute OSU
Columbus, Ohio, United States
UT Southwestern
Frisco, Texas, United States
UT Health Science center - Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UE-02-2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.