Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of LA-EP2006 and Neulasta®

NCT ID: NCT01735175

Last Updated: 2017-08-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

316 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will assess the efficacy of LA-EP2006 compared to Neulasta® with respect to the mean duration of severe neutropenia during treatment with myelosuppressive chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized, double-blind trial compared the proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with the reference Neulasta® in women (≥18 years) receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Therefore patients were randomized to receive LA-EP2006 (n = 159) or the reference product (n = 157) for ≤6 cycles of (neo)-adjuvant TAC (docetaxel 75mg/m\^2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m\^2, and cyclophosphamide 500mg/m\^2) chemotherapy. The primary end point was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during Cycle 1 (defined as number of consecutive days with absolute neutrophil count \<0.5 × 10\^9/l). The equivalence was confirmed if 95% CIs were within a ±1 day margin. LA-EP2006 was equivalent to the reference product in DSN (difference: 0.07 days; 95% CI \[-0.12, 0.26\]). Further, LA-EP2006 and the reference Neulasta® showed no clinically meaningful differences regarding efficacy and safety.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neutropenic Complications Breast Neoplasms Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia Chemotherapeutic Toxicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neulasta®

During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive Neulasta® s.c. post chemotherapy application.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neulasta®

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.

LA-EP2006

During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive LA-EP2006 s.c. post chemotherapy application.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LA-EP2006

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LA-EP2006

Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.

Intervention Type DRUG

Neulasta®

Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

pegfilgrastim pegfilgrastim

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* histologically proven breast cancer
* eligible for six cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* concurrent or prior chemotherapy for breast cancer
* concurrent or prior anti-cancer treatment for breast cancer such as endocrine therapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, and/or biological therapy
* concurrent prophylactic antibiotics
* previous therapy with any G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) product
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sandoz GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sandoz

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sandoz Biopharmaceutical Clinical Development

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sandoz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sandoz Investigational Site

Ijuí, , Brazil

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Lajeado, , Brazil

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Santo André, , Brazil

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Andhra Pradesh, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Delhi, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Madurai, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Maharashtra, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Maharashtra, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Maharashtra, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Rajasthan, , India

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Juchitán, , Mexico

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Bashkortostan, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Berdsk, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kabardino, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Oktyabrskaya, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Tula, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Veliky Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Kryvyi Rih, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Luhansk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Mariupol, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sandoz Investigational Site

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil India Mexico Romania Russia Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harbeck N, Lipatov O, Frolova M, Udovitsa D, Topuzov E, Ganea-Motan DE, Nakov R, Singh P, Rudy A, Blackwell K. Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(11):1359-67. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0016. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27020170 (View on PubMed)

Blackwell K, Gascon P, Jones CM, Nixon A, Krendyukov A, Nakov R, Li Y, Harbeck N. Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2272-2277. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx303.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28637287 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-004532-58

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LA-EP06-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.