Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of LA-EP2006 and Neulasta®
NCT ID: NCT01735175
Last Updated: 2017-08-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
316 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of LA-EP2006 and Peg-Filgrastim
NCT01516736
Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of EP2006 and Filgrastim
NCT01519700
Efficacy and Safety Study With MYL-1401H and Neulasta
NCT02467868
Randomized Phase 2, Dose-finding Efficacy, Safety Study of ANF-RHO™ Versus Neulasta® in Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia
NCT03559387
Aranesp and Neulasta in Patients With Sarcoma Receiving Adriamycin and Ifosfamide
NCT00283621
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neulasta®
During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive Neulasta® s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Neulasta®
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
LA-EP2006
During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive LA-EP2006 s.c. post chemotherapy application.
LA-EP2006
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LA-EP2006
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Neulasta®
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle pegfilgrastim is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* eligible for six cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
* concurrent or prior anti-cancer treatment for breast cancer such as endocrine therapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, and/or biological therapy
* concurrent prophylactic antibiotics
* previous therapy with any G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) product
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sandoz GmbH
INDUSTRY
Sandoz
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandoz Biopharmaceutical Clinical Development
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sandoz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ijuí, , Brazil
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lajeado, , Brazil
Sandoz Investigational Site
Santo André, , Brazil
Sandoz Investigational Site
Andhra Pradesh, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Delhi, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Madurai, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Maharashtra, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Maharashtra, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Maharashtra, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mumbai, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Rajasthan, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Aguascalientes, , Mexico
Sandoz Investigational Site
Juchitán, , Mexico
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Sandoz Investigational Site
Iași, , Romania
Sandoz Investigational Site
Suceava, , Romania
Sandoz Investigational Site
Barnaul, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bashkortostan, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Berdsk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ivanovo, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kabardino, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kazan', , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Krasnodar, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kursk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Moscow, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Oktyabrskaya, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ryazan, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Tula, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Veliky Novgorod, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Cherkasy, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Chernivtsi, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kharkiv, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kryvyi Rih, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Luhansk, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mariupol, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, , Ukraine
Sandoz Investigational Site
Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harbeck N, Lipatov O, Frolova M, Udovitsa D, Topuzov E, Ganea-Motan DE, Nakov R, Singh P, Rudy A, Blackwell K. Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(11):1359-67. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0016. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Blackwell K, Gascon P, Jones CM, Nixon A, Krendyukov A, Nakov R, Li Y, Harbeck N. Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2272-2277. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx303.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-004532-58
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
LA-EP06-301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.