A Study of Epoetin Alfa Plus Standard Supportive Care Versus Standard Supportive Care Only in Anemic Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Standard Chemotherapy

NCT ID: NCT00338286

Last Updated: 2018-03-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2098 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-03-02

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact on tumor progression as evaluated by progression-free survival (PFS) of epoetin alfa plus standard supportive care as compared with standard supportive care alone (packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusions), for treating anemia according to label guidance in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving standard chemotherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anemia is a common complication of the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and is related to the effects of chemotherapy and to chronic disease itself. This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, international study to further examine the safety of the study drug used with standard supportive care (i.e., packed RBC transfusions) compared to standard supportive care alone, when used to treat anemia associated with chemotherapy. This study will be done in subjects with metastatic breast cancer who are being or will be treated with first-line chemotherapy with standard dose schedules of taxane monotherapy, or a taxane plus trastuzumab, or an anthracycline plus either a taxane or cyclophosphamide. The study hypothesis is that epoetin alfa, when used as supportive anemia care, does not increase the risk of tumor progression or death. The study treatment will be compared to the control treatment by comparing progression-free survival, i.e., the number of months from the date a patient is randomized into the trial to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. In addition to their chemotherapy, half of the subjects will be assigned to receive study drug (epoetin alfa) and half of the subjects will be assigned to standard supportive care for anemia. Subjects treated with the study drug will receive standard supportive care (packed RBC transfusions) plus 40,000 IU epoetin alfa given subcutaneously once a week until 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy or until disease progression, whichever comes first.The hypothesis is to test that epoetin alfa, when used as supportive anemia care, is non-inferior to control (standard supportive care alone), as measured by progression free survival (PFS). Patients treated with the study drug will receive standard supportive care (packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusions) plus 40,000 IU epoetin alfa given subcutaneously once a week until 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy or until disease progression, whichever comes first. Dose adjustments (dose escalation, dose reduction, dose interruption, and dose resumption) of epoetin alfa will be based on hemoglobin (Hb) and confirm to prescribing information.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Neoplasm Metastasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

001

epoetin alfa + packed RBC transfusion 40 000 IU SC once a week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

epoetin alfa + packed RBC transfusion

Intervention Type DRUG

40,000 IU SC once a week.

002

Standard supportive care (packed RBC transfusion) Per doctor prescription

Group Type OTHER

Standard supportive care (packed RBC transfusion)

Intervention Type OTHER

Per doctor prescription

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard supportive care (packed RBC transfusion)

Per doctor prescription

Intervention Type OTHER

epoetin alfa + packed RBC transfusion

40,000 IU SC once a week.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed (e.g., slide of tissue) breast cancer
* HER2/NEU positive or negative
* Clinical evidence of metastasis (e.g., biopsy) with at least 1 measurable metastatic (M1) lesion prior to starting the current chemotherapy
* Received 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy
* Hemoglobin (Hb) \<= 11g/dL at the time of randomization
* planned to receive at least 2 more cycles of chemotherapy
* Life expectancy \> 6 months
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0 or 1
* At least 18 years old using effective birth control or surgically sterile or postmenopausal for 1 year

Exclusion Criteria

* Active second cancer
* no recent history of clinically relevant thrombovascular event
* Current treatment with anticoagulants
* Brain metastasis or CNS involvement
* Anemia secondary to another cause
* Recent (within prior 1 months) use of an ESA
* Patient pregnant or breast feeding
* Progressive disease during adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy
* Rapidly progressive or life-threatening metastatic disease
* Concomitant endocrine therapy
* Patient in whom the only site of metastasis was local and was successfully treated surgically.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rockledge, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hazard, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Alexandria, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Lake Success, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Capital Federal, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Airess, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Mendoza, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia/Go, , Brazil

Site Status

Ijuí, , Brazil

Site Status

Jaú, , Brazil

Site Status

Piracicaba, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Ribeirão Preto/Sp, , Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, , Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulol, , Brazil

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Arica, , Chile

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Temuco, , Chile

Site Status

Valdivia, , Chile

Site Status

Valparaíso, , Chile

Site Status

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Floridablanca-Santander, , Colombia

Site Status

Montería, , Colombia

Site Status

Cuenca, , Ecuador

Site Status

Guayaquil, , Ecuador

Site Status

Portoviejo, , Ecuador

Site Status

Quito, , Ecuador

Site Status

Batumi, , Georgia

Site Status

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Andra Pradesh, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Bengaluru, , India

Site Status

Bhopal, , India

Site Status

Delhi, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

Kārnād, , India

Site Status

Kerala, , India

Site Status

Kochi, , India

Site Status

Kolkata, , India

Site Status

Mangalore, , India

Site Status

Mumbai, , India

Site Status

Nashik, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Pune, , India

Site Status

Tamil Nadu Na, , India

Site Status

Tamil Nadu, , India

Site Status

Thiruvananthapuram, , India

Site Status

Uttar Pradesh, , India

Site Status

Vellore, , India

Site Status

Bandung, , Indonesia

Site Status

Jakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

Semarang, , Indonesia

Site Status

Yogyakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

George Town, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kampung Baharu Nilai, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kelantan, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Tanjung Bungah, , Malaysia

Site Status

Chihuahua City, , Mexico

Site Status

Guerrero, , Mexico

Site Status

León, , Mexico

Site Status

Mérida, , Mexico

Site Status

Morelia, , Mexico

Site Status

Puebla City, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Sinaloa, , Mexico

Site Status

Zapopan, , Mexico

Site Status

Bitola, , North Macedonia

Site Status

Skopje, , North Macedonia

Site Status

Cebu, , Philippines

Site Status

Davao City, , Philippines

Site Status

Iloilo City, , Philippines

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gliwice, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Onești, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Suceava, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Balashikha, , Russia

Site Status

Belgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Engels Saratov Region, , Russia

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Leningrad Region, , Russia

Site Status

Lipetsk, , Russia

Site Status

Magnitogorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Voronezh, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, , South Africa

Site Status

Klerksdorp, , South Africa

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Chiayi City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Hualien City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chernihiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Francovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnitsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Brazil Bulgaria Chile Colombia Ecuador Georgia Hong Kong India Indonesia Malaysia Mexico North Macedonia Philippines Poland Romania Russia South Africa Taiwan Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leyland-Jones B, Bondarenko I, Nemsadze G, Smirnov V, Litvin I, Kokhreidze I, Abshilava L, Janjalia M, Li R, Lakshmaiah KC, Samkharadze B, Tarasova O, Mohapatra RK, Sparyk Y, Polenkov S, Vladimirov V, Xiu L, Zhu E, Kimelblatt B, Deprince K, Safonov I, Bowers P, Vercammen E. A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Epoetin Alfa Versus Best Standard of Care in Anemic Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Standard Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1197-207. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5649. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26858335 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPOANE3010

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR005143

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2005-001817-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR005143

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Chemotherapy Related Anemia
NCT00035607 COMPLETED PHASE2