SPI-2012 vs Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Neutropenia in Participants With Breast Cancer With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ADVANCE)

NCT ID: NCT02643420

Last Updated: 2022-03-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-19

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPI-2012 vs pegfilgrastim in participants with breast cancer treated with TC chemotherapy.

Each cycle was 21 days. Four cycles were evaluated in this study. On Day 1 of each cycle, participants received TC chemotherapy. On Day 2 of each cycle, participants received study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neutropenia Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC)

Participants received SPI-2012 13.2 milligram (mg)/0.6 milliliter (mL) (3.6 mg Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor \[G-CSF\]) fixed-dose subcutaneous (SC) injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle and included Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SPI-2012

Intervention Type DRUG

Single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy

Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC)

Participants received pegfilgrastim 6 mg SC injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy on Day 1 of each cycle included Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 IV infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pegfilgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Single-dose subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SPI-2012

Single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Pegfilgrastim

Single-dose subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel

Standard therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

Standard therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rolontis® Eflapegrastim (HM10460A) Neulasta® Taxotere Cytoxan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* New diagnosis of histologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), defined as operable Stage I to Stage IIIA breast cancer
* Candidate for adjuvant or neoadjuvant TC chemotherapy
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 2
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5×10\^9/L
* Platelet count ≥ 100×10\^9/L
* Hemoglobin \> 9 g/dL
* Creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min
* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL
* Aspartate Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (AST/SGOT) and Alanine Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2.5× Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).
* Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.0×ULN

Exclusion Criteria

* Active concurrent malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) or life-threatening disease
* Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
* Known sensitivity to E. coli -derived products or to any products to be administered during dosing
* Concurrent adjuvant cancer therapy
* Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or other G-CSF products in clinical development within 12 months prior to the administration of study drug
* Active infection, receiving anti-infectives, or any serious underlying medical condition that would impair ability to receive protocol treatment
* Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant
* Use of any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to study treatment or plans to use any of these during the course of the study
* Radiation therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
* Major surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Center for Cancer Care

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arizona Clinical Research Center/ ACRC

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Yuma Regional Medical Center

Yuma, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Genesis Cancer Center

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

NEA Baptist Clinic | Fowler Family Center for Cancer Care

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center

Berkeley, California, United States

Site Status

Precision Research Institute, LLC

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group, Inc.

Corona, California, United States

Site Status

Compassionate Care Research Group, Inc.

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach Memorial Medical Center

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Pacific Shores Medical Group

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Valley Medical Oncology Consultants

Pleasanton, California, United States

Site Status

Emad Ibrahim, MD, Inc.

Redlands, California, United States

Site Status

Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group, Inc

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

St Joseph Heritage Healthcare Institution

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Wellness Oncology Hematology

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Omega Research Consultants LLC

DeBary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pasco Pinellas Cancer Center

Holiday, Florida, United States

Site Status

AMPM Research Clinic

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakes Research, LLC

Miami Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mid Florida Hematology and Oncology Centers

Orange City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Cancer Research Institute

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bond Clinic, P.A.

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

John B Amos Cancer Center

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center

Fort Gordon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Memorial Health University Medical Center

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Clintell, Inc/Swedish Covenant Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Joliet Oncology Hematology Associates

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Oncology Specialists, SC

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Swedish American Cancer Center

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Franciscan St. Francis Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Floyd Memorial Cancer Center of Indiana

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium

Westville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Ashland-Bellefonte Cancer Center

Ashland, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

West Ky Hematology & Oncology Group, PSC

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Pontchartrain Cancer Center

Covington, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Highland Clinic

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Penobscot Bay Medical Center

Rockport, Maine, United States

Site Status

RCCA MD LLC/The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Reliant Medical Group

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Quest Research Institute

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Forrest General Hospital

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Freeman Health Systems

Joplin, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Frontier Cancer Center

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Southeast Nebraska Hematology & Oncology Consultants, PC

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

New Jersey Hematology Oncology Associates

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates

East Setauket, New York, United States

Site Status

Waverly Hematology Oncology

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Aultman Hospital

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Gabrail Cancer Center Research

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Lindner Research Center at the Christ Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mercy Health Youngstown LLC DBA

Youngstown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis

Corvallis, Oregon, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Associates in Hematology and Oncology, PC

Upland, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

AnMed Health Cancer Center

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bon Secours Saint Francis Cancer

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolina Blood and Cancer Care

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

The West Clinic, PC, d/b/a West Cancer Center

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

CHI St. Joseph Health Cancer Center

Bryan, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology -Methodist Dallas Cancer Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Oncology Consultants

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology, PA

McAllen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Richardson Medical Center- Cancer Center

Richardson, Texas, United States

Site Status

Northern Utah Associates

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Delta Oncology Associates

Portsmouth, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHU de Quebec - Universite Laval

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Cha Bundang Medical Center

Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Severance Hospital

Sinchon-dong, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada South Korea

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SPI-GCF-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.