Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of LA-EP2006 and Peg-Filgrastim
NCT ID: NCT01516736
Last Updated: 2017-08-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
308 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of LA-EP2006 and Neulasta®
NCT01735175
Phase III Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of EP2006 and Filgrastim
NCT01519700
Efficacy and Safety Study With MYL-1401H and Neulasta
NCT02467868
A Non-inferiority Study Comparing Two Filgrastim Preparations in Breast Cancer
NCT01079676
Trial Comparing Pegfilgrastim With Filgrastim as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
NCT00114764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LA-EP2006
During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive LA-EP2006 s.c. post chemotherapy application.
LA-EP2006
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle LA-EP2006 is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Neulasta®
During each chemotherapy cycle eligible patients receive Neulasta® s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Neulasta®
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle Neulasta® is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LA-EP2006
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle LA-EP2006 is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Neulasta®
Eligible patients are scheduled to receive six cycles of chemotherapy every three weeks. During each chemotherapy cycle Neulasta® is injected s.c. post chemotherapy application.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* eligible for six cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
* concurrent or prior anti-cancer treatment for breast cancer such as endocrine therapy, immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies, and/or biological therapy
* concurrent prophylactic antibiotics
* previous therapy with any G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) product
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sandoz GmbH
INDUSTRY
Sandoz
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandoz Biopharmaceutical Clinical Development
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Corona, California, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mount Sterling, Kentucky, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bismarck, North Dakota, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina
Sandoz Investigational Site
Temuco, , Chile
Sandoz Investigational Site
Chennai, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Delhi, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Gujarat, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hyderabad, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Karamsad, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lucknow, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Maharashtra, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mangalore, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mumbai, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pradesh, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Surat, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Vadodara, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Vellore, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
Visakhapatnam, , India
Sandoz Investigational Site
George Town, , Malaysia
Sandoz Investigational Site
George Town, , Malaysia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kampung Baharu Nilai, , Malaysia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kelantan, , Malaysia
Sandoz Investigational Site
San Juan, , Puerto Rico
Sandoz Investigational Site
San Juan, , Puerto Rico
Sandoz Investigational Site
Arkhangelsk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bashkortostan, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bryansk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kazan', , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Krasnoyarsk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Moscow, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Omsk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Orenburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Oryol, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Rostov-on-Don, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Tomsk, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Vladimir, , Russia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Barcelona, , Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Madrid, , Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, , Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blackwell K, Donskih R, Jones CM, Nixon A, Vidal MJ, Nakov R, Singh P, Schaffar G, Gascon P, Harbeck N. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Oncologist. 2016 Jul;21(7):789-94. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0011. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
Blackwell K, Gascon P, Jones CM, Nixon A, Krendyukov A, Nakov R, Li Y, Harbeck N. Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2272-2277. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx303.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LA-EP06-302
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.