Patient Preference for Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) Application Forms
NCT ID: NCT03619993
Last Updated: 2019-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
404 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-25
2019-09-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patient-reported outcomes on preference for either application form can help to guide physicians' treatment choice, particularly in terms of application of the same active substance, in this study pegfilgrastim.
This study aims to compare the two application forms of pegfilgrastim (pegfilgrastim pre-filled syringe vs. On-body injector for pegfilgrastim) with regard to patient preference and health economy. A trial design with randomization of patients to receive the two application forms of pegfilgrastim in an alternating sequence for 4 cycles starting with either On-body injector for pegfilgrastim (Arm A) or pegfilgrastim pre-filled syringe (Arm B) was chosen. In this way, all patients will receive both application forms in order to be able to decide for their individual preference. Four cycles (that means each patient will receive each application form of pegfilgrastim twice) should be a sufficient number for the patient to make a decision. This design with two treatment arms serves to exclude a systematic bias that might be generated when starting with the same application form for all patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A: Start with On-body injector
4 consecutive cycles of treatment in total, with 2 cycles of treatment with pegfilgrastim pre-filled syringe (PS) and 2 cycles of treatment with On-body injector (OBI) for pegfilgrastim in an alternating sequence (OBI-PS-OBI-PS)
On-body injector
Medical device for subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim) automatically after 27 hours after application of device.
Pre-filled syringe
For subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim).
Arm B: Start with pre-filled syringe
4 consecutive cycles of treatment in total, with 2 cycles of treatment with pegfilgrastim pre-filled syringe (PS) and 2 cycles of treatment with On-body injector (OBI) for pegfilgrastim in an alternating sequence (PS-OBI-PS-OBI)
On-body injector
Medical device for subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim) automatically after 27 hours after application of device.
Pre-filled syringe
For subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
On-body injector
Medical device for subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim) automatically after 27 hours after application of device.
Pre-filled syringe
For subcutaneous injection of a supportive medicine (Pegfilgrastim).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Life expectancy \> 3 months
* Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
* Ability to read and understand German
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject is currently enrolled or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug trial(s) or is receiving investigational agent(s)
* Active infection or any serious underlying medical condition, which would impair the ability of the patient to receive protocol treatment
* Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantion
* Subject of child-bearing potential is evidently pregnant (e.g. positive HCG (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin) test) or is breast feeding
* Subject is not using adequate contraceptive precautions.
* Other conditions which, in the opinion of the investigator, make participation in an investigational trial of this nature a poor risk
* Concerns for subject's compliance with the protocol procedures
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
iOMEDICO AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Metz, Dr. med.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
OSP Göttingen - Gemeinschaftspraxis Dres. Meyer, Ammon, Metz und Müller
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Research Site
Aschaffenburg, , Germany
Research Site
Augsburg, , Germany
Research Site
Berlin, , Germany
Research Site
Bonn, , Germany
Research Site
Celle, , Germany
Research Site
Dresden, , Germany
Research Site
Dresden, , Germany
Research Site
Erfurt, , Germany
Research Site
Flensburg, , Germany
Research Site
Frankfurt (Oder), , Germany
Research Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Research Site
Georgsmarienhütte, , Germany
Research Site
Goslar, , Germany
Research Site
Göttingen, , Germany
Research Site
Halberstadt, , Germany
Research Site
Halle, , Germany
Research Site
Hanover, , Germany
Research Site
Heidelberg, , Germany
Research Site
Herne, , Germany
Research Site
Hildburghausen, , Germany
Research Site
Hildesheim, , Germany
Research Site
Kaiserslautern, , Germany
Research Site
Kassel, , Germany
Research Site
Köthen, , Germany
Research Site
Krefeld, , Germany
Research Site
Mannheim, , Germany
Research Site
Mayen, , Germany
Research Site
Moers, , Germany
Research Site
Mühlhausen, , Germany
Research Site
Mülheim, , Germany
Research Site
München, , Germany
Research Site
Naunhof, , Germany
Research Site
Neunkirchen, , Germany
Research Site
Neustadt in Sachsen, , Germany
Research Site
Nordhorn, , Germany
Research Site
Offenbach, , Germany
Research Site
Oldenburg, , Germany
Research Site
Ostfildern, , Germany
Research Site
Passau, , Germany
Research Site
Plauen, , Germany
Research Site
Ratingen, , Germany
Research Site
Rostock, , Germany
Research Site
Singen, , Germany
Research Site
Sömmerda, , Germany
Research Site
Spremberg, , Germany
Research Site
Stolberg, , Germany
Research Site
Stralsund, , Germany
Research Site
Würselen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Metz M, Semsek D, Rogmans G, Hutzschenreuter U, Fietz T, Harde J, Zacharias S, Hielscher C, Lorenz A, Zahn MO, Guth D, Liebers S, Berghorn M, Grebhardt S, Matillon CD, Egerer G, Potthoff K. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6633-6643. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06230-9. Epub 2021 May 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IOM-040369
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id