Study in Cancer Patients With Central Line Associated Clots in the Upper Extremity Treated With Rivaroxaban (Catheter 2)
NCT ID: NCT01708850
Last Updated: 2016-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize that anticoagulation with rivaroxaban in patients with UEDVT secondary to central venous catheters in patients with active malignancy is an effective therapy as quantified by the success of catheter preservation. Prolonged line salvage rate without recurrence of UEDVT will improve the management of cancer patients who develop an upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in the setting of a central venous catheter.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Thromboprophylaxis With Rivaroxaban In Patients With Malignancy and Central Venous Lines
NCT03506815
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Participants
NCT02555878
Cancer Associated Thrombosis, a Pilot Treatment Study Using Rivaroxaban
NCT02746185
Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Malignancy and Central Venous Catheters
NCT05029063
Rivaroxaban Utilization for Treatment and Prevention of Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Experience at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
NCT02502396
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Strengths of this study include its prospective cohort format, and access to a large oncologic population through the London Regional Cancer Program and other corresponding centres. In addition, The Catheter Study looking at CVC survival and safety in patients with cancer diagnosed with UEDVT and treated with a bridging protocol of warfarin/dalteparin was organized primarily through the LHSc and results therein could be directly compared to the results from this study given the similar patient population.
Limitations of this study include the small sample size and the fact that there is no LMWH monotherapy comparison group. In addition, this will be an open study with no blinding, given the nature of line survival. There is also the chance that a proportion of patients will have their catheters removed for other reasons, such as finishing treatment or personal preference, which could affect the validity of survival results.
This design was selected given the small number of patients presenting with this diagnosis each year at our centre, which would present difficulty in accruing enough patients for several comparisons group. Results will be compared to the Catheter Study and previous literature.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban 15 mg po bid x 3 weeks, followed by rivaroxaban 20 mg po daily x 9 weeks. Then up to discretion of investigator to decide regarding further anticoagulation as study length is limited to 12 weeks.
Rivaroxaban
All specified in arm description. One arm study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rivaroxaban
All specified in arm description. One arm study.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic acute upper limb thrombosis in the axillary, subclavian, innominate or internal jugular veins, with or without pulmonary embolism, associated with central venous catheter objectively documented by compression ultrasonography, venogram or CT scan.
3. Diagnosis of active malignancy (other than non-melanoma skin cancer), defined as patients who are either receiving active treatment, or have metastatic disease or who have been diagnosed within the past two years.
4. Willing to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active bleeding or high risk for major bleeding.
3. Platelet Count \< 75 x 109/L.
4. Creatinine Clearance \< 30 mL/min.
5. Currently on other anticoagulant with therapeutic intent for another indication.\*
6. Pulmonary embolism accompanied by hemodynamic instability or oxygen requirement.
7. Inability to infuse through the catheter after a trial of intraluminal thrombolytic therapy (ie. 2 mg tPA).
8. Patients with AML, ALL or multiple myeloma with a bone marrow or stem cell transplant planned within the next 3 months.
9. Thrombosis involving the brachial or cephalic veins only.
10. Treatment for current episode \> 7 days with any acceptable anticoagulant therapy.
11. Concomitant use of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibitors (ie. azole antifungals such as ketoconazole) or inducers (ie. rifampicin, antiepileptics).\*
12. Recent coronary artery stent requiring dual anti-platelet therapy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gwynivere Davies
Resident Researcher (Principal Investigator: Dr. Michael Kovacs
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr. Michael J. Kovacs, MD, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
London Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kovacs MJ, Kahn SR, Rodger M, Anderson DR, Andreou R, Mangel JE, Morrow B, Clement AM, Wells PS. A pilot study of central venous catheter survival in cancer patients using low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) and warfarin without catheter removal for the treatment of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (The Catheter Study). J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Aug;5(8):1650-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02613.x. Epub 2007 May 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Catheter 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.