Peri-procedural Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Central VENOus Catheters in CAncer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism or Atrial Fibrillation Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT06887270

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-30

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The peri-procedural management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in persons with cancer (PWC) undergoing tunneled or port central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a common but understudied clinical problem, with conflicting management advice from guidelines and resultant uncertainty for best practices. Data from prospective studies assessing peri-procedural DOAC management exist; however, these data pertain to procedures in the general population. These management strategies may not be applicable to PWC because (1) although CVC insertion is a low risk, image-guided specialized procedure, (2) PWC are at considerably higher risk of peri-procedural bleeding and thrombosis than non-PWC. It is not surprising, therefore, that guideline recommendations and current practices vary widely. To resolve management uncertainty and establish a standard-of-care, the VENOCAT pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a first step that will assess the feasibility of a definitive trial comparing continued vs. interrupted DOAC management in PWC undergoing tunneled or port CVC insertion. Evidence is needed to standardize clinical practice and reduce the risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anticoagulant-induced Bleeding Direct Oral Anticoagulant Cancer Central Venous Catheter Periprocedural Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continued DOAC

The continued DOAC group will continue their DOAC peri-procedurally as routine without interruption.

This management strategy was devised based on the cardiac device insertion studies which found continued AC to be a safe and efficacious strategy for cardiac device insertion, which is procedurally similar to tunneled or port CVC insertion. This is the peri-procedural AC strategy for tunneled or port CVC insertion suggested by the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continued DOAC

Intervention Type OTHER

The continued DOAC group will continue their DOAC peri-procedurally as routine without interruption.

Interrupted DOAC

The interrupted DOAC group will take their last DOAC dose on Day -2, unless their DOAC is Dabigatran and their creatinine clearance is \< 50mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation), in which their last dose will be on Day -3. The DOAC will be resumed on Day +1. This management strategy was utilized in the PAUSE study and was devised taking into account DOAC half-lives, manufacturer recommendations, and available literature. With this strategy, DOACs would be interrupted for three to four halflives, resulting in minimal residual anticoagulant effect. DOAC interruption is described by number of days rather than hours to allow for a simple pragmatic strategy that would be easy to apply in practice and follow by patients. This strategy was found to be safe and efficacious in the PAUSE and cardiac device insertion studies. This is the peri-procedural AC strategy for tunneled or port CVC insertion suggested by the ISTH.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interrupted DOAC

Intervention Type OTHER

The interrupted DOAC group will take their last DOAC dose on Day -2, unless their DOAC is Dabigatran and their creatinine clearance is \< 50mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation), in which their last dose will be on Day -3. The DOAC will be resumed on Day +1.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continued DOAC

The continued DOAC group will continue their DOAC peri-procedurally as routine without interruption.

Intervention Type OTHER

Interrupted DOAC

The interrupted DOAC group will take their last DOAC dose on Day -2, unless their DOAC is Dabigatran and their creatinine clearance is \< 50mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation), in which their last dose will be on Day -3. The DOAC will be resumed on Day +1.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult patients with VTE or non-valvular AF on prophylactic or therapeutic dose DOAC
2. Active cancer, defined as diagnosed within the past 6 months; or recurrent, regionally advanced, or metastatic cancer; or for which treatment had been administered within 6 months of port or tunneled CVC insertion; or hematologic cancer not in complete remission
3. Pending elective radiologically guided insertion of tunneled or port CVC
4. Able and willing to adhere to peri-procedural DOAC management plan and follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

1. Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault equation) \<30 mL/min for Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Edoxaban, and \<25mL/min for Apixaban
2. Diagnosis of VTE within 21 days
3. Platelet count \< 50 x 10\^9/L at time of study entry
4. Concomitant strong inhibitors or inducers to P-glycoprotein and/or CYP-3A4
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helliwell Foundation

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jameel Abdulrehman, MD, MSc

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25-5249

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Implementing VTE Prevention in Ambulatory Cancer Care
NCT07292376 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA