Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban: The Pilot Study

NCT ID: NCT02559856

Last Updated: 2025-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This vanguard pilot study compares rivaroxaban and apixaban, two of the new oral blood thinners for the treatment of blood clots. Half of the patients will receive apixaban and half will receive rivaroxaban. The main objective is to determine the feasibility of patient recruitment and resources required to follow enrolled patients and inform for a larger, multi-centered trial and to assess which one is safer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently developed new oral anticoagulants (OAC) overcome some of the limitations of established therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), due to ease of administration and more predictable pharmacokinetic properties. Many clinical questions about the new OAC remain unanswered because there have not been direct head-to-head comparison trials. For example, although studies have shown that rivaroxaban and apixaban are at least as effective and safe as LMWH and VKA, meta-analyses suggest that apixaban may be associated with lower bleeding risk. Concerns about the potential impact of medication non-adherence have been raised. Compliance with twice daily medications (e.g. apixaban) is often worse than once daily medications (e.g. rivaroxaban). Both of these medications are approved by Health Canada for treatment of VTE yet there is genuine uncertainty about which of the two direct OAC confer the best risk-to-benefit ratio.This is a multi-centre, prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) trial assessing clinical feasibility for a larger multi-centered trial comparing bleeding outcomes using apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for treatment of acute VTE. The primary objective of the study is to determine if it is feasible to conduct a large randomized multicenter trial comparing apixaban vs. rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute VTE. The secondary objectives are to assess safety and superiority of apixaban vs rivaroxaban.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Apixaban

10 mg PO twice-a-day for 1 week, then 5 mg PO, twice daily for 3 or 6 months of treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Apixaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban

15 mg PO twice-a-day for 3 weeks, then 20 mg PO once daily for 3 or 6 months of treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Apixaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Eliquis Xarelto

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed newly diagnosed acute VTE (proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and segmental or greater pulmonary embolism)
* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Any contraindication for anticoagulation such as active bleeding
* Clinically significant liver disease or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ≥ 3 times the upper limit of normal range
* Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault formula (29)
* Known allergies to either apixaban or rivaroxaban
* Pregnancy
* Use of contraindicated medications with apixaban or rivaroxaban
* Active malignancy in the last 6 months (excluding localized skin malignancy)
* No private insurance coverage for the study drug or not willing to pay for study drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Venous Thromboembolism Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research (CanVECTOR) Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lana Castellucci, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hôtel-Dieu de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COBRRA Pilot

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

20150574-01H

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.