Apixaban Versus Rivaroxaban in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
NCT ID: NCT06862726
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to be able to study the stability of the anti-Xa activity of Apixaban vs Rivaroxaban, as well as their impact on the risk of thromboembolic events or hemorrhagic events, clinical follow-up and a determination of maximum and residual activity are necessary, ideally at 3 to 6 months (compared to studies carried out in the literature).
This evaluation would be made according to a multivariate analysis taking into consideration the other clinical-biological data relating to the patient, namely renal function, liver function, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLEED score, treatment compliance, etc.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Phase 2 Study To Evaluate The Safety Of Apixaban In Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00787150
Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban and Apixaban in Comparison to Warfarin in Left Ventricular Clot- Clinical Trial
NCT05973188
Comparative Study of Oral Anticoagulation in Left Ventricular Thrombi
NCT03926780
Rivaroxaban Versus Apixaban in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
NCT06531122
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Among Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02666157
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thus, effective anticoagulation is one of the major pillars of the management of atrial fibrillation. This anticoagulation was for a long time based on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) which have proven their effectiveness in significantly reducing the risk of thromboembolic complications. However, VKAs have several drawbacks, mainly related to their narrow therapeutic range, their high inter-individual variability and their multiple drug interactions. As a result, the use of VKAs is restrictive because of the need for a delicate, regular and individual adjustment of the effective dose based on the result of the INR (need for regular and close biological monitoring) .
Since 2007, a new class of oral anticoagulant encompassing direct oral anticoagulants has emerged and is increasingly beginning to take the place of VKAs in several pathologies, including AF. Indeed, DOACs are currently the first-line treatment during AF thanks to the results of randomized controlled clinical trials that have proven an efficacy at least equivalent to VKA without increasing the risk of serious bleeding. In addition, DOACs are simpler to use compared to VKAs because of their predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, which make it possible to use a fixed dose and dispense with biological monitoring of their plasma levels in the majority of cases.
However, it seems that there is a significant inter- and intra-individual variability related to the use of DOACs. In addition, the theory of a single dose and the non-need for monitoring is beginning to be debated. Indeed, the indications requiring an AOD assay seem to be broadening. Recently, studies have been identified in the literature that are interested in assessing the impact of the maximum and residual activity of DOAC on its efficacy and safety. Despite significant results, especially in relation to the fluctuation of residual activity, there are so far no strong conclusions of a high level of evidence that can rule on the usefulness of adjusting the dose according to the dosage of activity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VKA
This arm contain 40 patients on anti-vitamin K. Their prothromin level and INR will be measured
Dosage of PT-INR
This arm contain 40 pateints treated by VKA,. PT-INR dosage will be performed.
Apixaban
This arm contain 40 patients. Anti Xa activity and Time in the range will be monitored
Anti Xa dosage
VKA: quadriseparable tablet Apixaban: 5 mg twice daily or 2.5 twice daily Rivaroxaban: 20 mg once a day or 15 mg once a day
Rivaroxaban
This arm contain 40 patients. Anti Xa activity and Time in the range will be monitored
Anti Xa dosage
VKA: quadriseparable tablet Apixaban: 5 mg twice daily or 2.5 twice daily Rivaroxaban: 20 mg once a day or 15 mg once a day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anti Xa dosage
VKA: quadriseparable tablet Apixaban: 5 mg twice daily or 2.5 twice daily Rivaroxaban: 20 mg once a day or 15 mg once a day
Dosage of PT-INR
This arm contain 40 pateints treated by VKA,. PT-INR dosage will be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients diagnosed with AF;
* Written informed consent obtained prior to participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* History of hypersensitivity to study drugs or drugs with a similar chemical structure.
* Patients receiving combination therapy of P-glycoprotein inhibitors or inducers such as itraconazole, ketoconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, ritonavir, rifampicin, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine, within 14 days prior to taking apixaban
* Pregnant women
* Breastfeeding
* Patients Enrolled in Other Clinical Studies
* Patients who refuse to sign consent.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Les Laboratoires des Médicaments Stériles
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charles Nicolle hospital
Tunis, , Tunisia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mavri A, Vene N, Bozic-Mijovski M, Miklic M, Soderblom L, Pohanka A, Malmstrom RE, Antovic J. Apixaban concentration variability and relation to clinical outcomes in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):13908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93372-9.
Katritsis DG, Gersh BJ, Camm AJ. Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation - Current Concepts. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015 Aug;4(2):100-7. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.04.02.100.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Apixa Xa
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.