A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Participants

NCT ID: NCT02555878

Last Updated: 2019-09-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

841 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-11

Study Completion Date

2018-08-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that rivaroxaban is superior to placebo for reducing the risk of the primary composite outcome as defined by objectively confirmed symptomatic lower extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), asymptomatic lower extremity proximal DVT, symptomatic lower extremity distal DVT, symptomatic upper extremity DVT, symptomatic non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), incidental PE, and venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related death in ambulatory adult participants with various cancer types receiving systemic cancer therapy who are at high risk of developing a VTE.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, superiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban with placebo for primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory adult participants, with various cancer types who are scheduled to initiate systemic cancer therapy. The study consists of 3 Phases: Screening Phase (14 Days), double-blind treatment Phase (180 Days) and follow up Phase (30 Days). The duration of participation in the study for each participant is approximately 32 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rivaroxaban

Participants will be administered rivaroxaban 10 milligram (mg) tablet orally once daily for 180 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban 10 milligram (mg) tablet will be administered orally once daily for 180 days.

Placebo

Participants will be administered matching placebo tablet orally once daily for 180 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet will be administered orally once daily for 180 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban 10 milligram (mg) tablet will be administered orally once daily for 180 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo tablet will be administered orally once daily for 180 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have histologically confirmed solid malignancy including but not limited to: pancreas, lung, stomach, colon, rectum, bladder, breast, ovary, renal or lymphoma (hematologic), with locally advanced or metastatic disease
* Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2
* Have a Khorana thromboembolic risk Score greater than or equal to (\>=) 2
* Creatinine clearance (CrCl) \>= 30 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
* Plan to initiate systemic cancer therapy within plus or minus (+-) 1 week of receiving the first dose of study drug with the intention of receiving systemic cancer therapy during the double-blind treatment period for an intended duration determined by the treating oncologist according to standard protocols of clinical care

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of primary brain tumors
* Known history of brain metastases
* Bleeding diathesis, hemorrhagic lesions, active bleeding, and other conditions with a high risk for bleeding
* Hematologic malignancies with the exception of lymphoma
* Platelet count less than (\<) 50,000/millimeter\^3 (mm\^3), Life expectancy of less than or equal to (\<=) 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Martinez, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Norwich, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Shores, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Joliet, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Anderson, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Brewer, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Abilene, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Denton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Flower Mound, Texas, United States

Site Status

Garland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Paris, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Winchester, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Weston, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Amberloup, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Laken (brussel), , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Caxias do Sul, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Itajaí, , Brazil

Site Status

Lajeado, , Brazil

Site Status

Londrina, , Brazil

Site Status

Mogi das Cruzes, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rs, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

Santo André, , Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Sorocaba, , Brazil

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Benešov nad Černou, , Czechia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Jindřichův Hradec, , Czechia

Site Status

Kladno, , Czechia

Site Status

Liberec, , Czechia

Site Status

Nový Jičín, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Tábor, , Czechia

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Hyers, , France

Site Status

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Brandenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany

Site Status

Gauting, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Herne, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Merseburg, , Germany

Site Status

Minden, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Paderborn, , Germany

Site Status

Recklinghausen, , Germany

Site Status

Weiden, , Germany

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kursk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavi, , Russia

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cheltenham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swindon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany Russia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khorana AA, Barnard J, Wun T, Vijapurkar U, Damaraju CV, Moore KT, Wildgoose P, McCrae KR. Biomarker signatures in cancer patients with and without venous thromboembolism events: a substudy of CASSINI. Blood Adv. 2022 Feb 22;6(4):1212-1221. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005710.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34807979 (View on PubMed)

Rutjes AW, Porreca E, Candeloro M, Valeriani E, Di Nisio M. Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33337539 (View on PubMed)

Vadhan-Raj S, McNamara MG, Venerito M, Riess H, O'Reilly EM, Overman MJ, Zhou X, Vijapurkar U, Kaul S, Wildgoose P, Khorana AA. Rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with pancreatic cancer: Results from a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the randomized CASSINI study. Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(17):6196-6204. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3269. Epub 2020 Jul 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32663379 (View on PubMed)

Khorana AA, Soff GA, Kakkar AK, Vadhan-Raj S, Riess H, Wun T, Streiff MB, Garcia DA, Liebman HA, Belani CP, O'Reilly EM, Patel JN, Yimer HA, Wildgoose P, Burton P, Vijapurkar U, Kaul S, Eikelboom J, McBane R, Bauer KA, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH; CASSINI Investigators. Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 21;380(8):720-728. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814630.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30786186 (View on PubMed)

Khorana AA, Vadhan-Raj S, Kuderer NM, Wun T, Liebman H, Soff G, Belani C, O'Reilly EM, McBane R, Eikelboom J, Damaraju CV, Beyers K, Dietrich F, Kakkar AK, Riess H, Peixoto RD, Lyman GH. Rivaroxaban for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer: Rationale and Design of the CASSINI Trial. Rationale and Design of the CASSINI Trial. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Nov 1;117(11):2135-2145. doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-0171. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28933799 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

39039039STM4001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-001630-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR107047

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.