MedDataX Logo

Functional Outcome Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

NCT ID: NCT01693757

Last Updated: 2012-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare hop performance and jump landing strategy in soccer players with higher level sports activities after ACLR using either BPTB or STG and controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial. Despite the need for outcome studies comparing bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) with semitendinosus and gracilis tendon (STG), few studies have evaluated functional outcomes. The objective of the current study was to compare hop performance and jump landing strategy in soccer players with higher level sports activities after ACLR using either BPTB or STG and controls.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Hamstrings versus patellar tendon Hop test Return to sports

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BPTB group

Bone-patellar tendon-bone

No interventions assigned to this group

STG group

Semitendinosus and gracilis tendon

No interventions assigned to this group

Control

Healthy

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ACLR and controls.

Exclusion Criteria

* Musculoskeletal injuries
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Farshid Mohammadi

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mahyar Salavati, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

USWR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

USWR

Tehran, , Iran

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iran

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

USWR

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id