Comparison of Anti-Xa Activity of ENOXA ® Versus LOVENOX ® in Acute Coronary Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT01687491

Last Updated: 2015-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

179 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a clinical trial monocentric, open, randomized ENOXA ® versus LOVENOX ®, conducted on two parallel groups of patients admitted in emergency for acute coronary syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients included in this study with an acute coronary Syndrome be admitted to the emergency room and receive treatment with enoxaparin. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment in this indication is usually spread over a week. The experience of the study intends to focus only on the first injection administered in selected patients.

Two assays are carried out, including an assessment of the anti-Xa activity initially before injection of enoxaparin, and 4 hours after administration of the first syringe.

Clinical monitoring is intrahospital from the date of hospitalization of patients included until emergency exit (transfer to another service, or return home)

Tolerance assessment (clinical and biological) is performed during follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Factor X

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Enoxa

ENOXA® Anti-Xa/kg 100 IU by subcutaneous injection every 12 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ENOXA®

Intervention Type DRUG

enoxaparine 100 UI/Kg subcutaneous injection

Lovenox

LOVENOX® Anti-Xa/kg 100 IU by subcutaneous injection every 12 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LOVENOX®

Intervention Type DRUG

enoxaparine 100 UI/Kg subcutaneous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ENOXA®

enoxaparine 100 UI/Kg subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

LOVENOX®

enoxaparine 100 UI/Kg subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female over the age of 20 years
* acute coronary syndrome
* Admission to the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient participating in another study
* Pregnant or lactating or of childbearing potential not using medically accepted method of contraception
* Taking an anticoagulant in the last three months
* Patient with known haemostatic disorder
* Contraindication absolute and / or relative to the use of enoxaparin
* Nobody wishing to participate in this study or not having the ability to understand its objectives
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Fattouma Bourguiba

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Les Laboratoires des Médicaments Stériles

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Semir Nouira, PHD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir

Mohsen Hassine

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fattouma Bourguiba, Monastir

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Departement of Emergency

Monastir, Monastir Governorate, Tunisia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Tunisia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boubaker H MD, Grissa MH MD, Sassi M MD, Chakroun T MD, Beltaief K MD, et al. (2015) Generic and Branded Enoxaparin Bioequivalence: A Clinical and Experimental Study. J Bioequiv Availab 7: 225-228. doi:10.4172/jbb.1000244

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AXA_2012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.