Edoxaban vs. Warfarin in Subjects Undergoing Cardioversion of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF)

NCT ID: NCT02072434

Last Updated: 2019-03-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2199 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-25

Study Completion Date

2016-02-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare edoxaban to warfarin (with enoxaparin, if needed). It will see if edoxaban prevents stroke and other blood clotting problems as well and as safely as warfarin. People with atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) might be able to join. Their doctors must plan to use shock to make their hearts beat normally. About 2200 people from different countries will join. They will have an equal chance of receiving either treatment. They are anticipated to be in the study for around 82 days. Tests will include physicals and finger-pricks. Participants will provide blood and urine samples.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare edoxaban (investigational drug) with warfarin and enoxaparin, to see if it is safe and effective in preventing stroke and other blood clot complications in subjects with atrial fibrillation whose doctors plan to treat them with an electrical cardioversion. It is expected that 284 sites will recruit 2200 subjects from North America, EU, Russia, Ukraine and Israel. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either treatment with edoxaban, or treatment with warfarin, plus enoxaparin if required. Participants will have an equal chance of receiving either treatment. Participants will be in the study for a maximum of 82 days. Study procedures will include physical examinations, vital signs (pulse and sitting blood pressure), ECG (electrocardiogram), finger prick blood clotting tests, blood samples and urine samples.

The study is expected to show that edoxaban will provide comparable incidence rates to warfarin plus enoxaparin, the current standard treatment for both efficacy and bleeding.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Edoxaban

Edoxaban oral tablet, 60 mg-once daily (QD), reduced to 30 mg based on protocol-defined parameters, for up to 49 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Edoxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Edoxaban 30 mg tablets for oral administration

Warfarin

Participants naïve to anticoagulation, taking anticoagulants other than a Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or taking a VKA but with a prothrombin time (PT) international normalized ratio (INR) of less than 2.0 receive enoxaparin until they reach a PT INR of at least 2.0, before taking warfarin.

All participants in this arm receive warfarin oral tablet QD at their doctor's prescribed dose, for up to 49 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Warfarin

Intervention Type DRUG

Warfarin tablet, 1.0 or 2.5 mg, for oral administration

Enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

Enoxaparin per label, at prescribed dose until PT INR at least 2.0

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Edoxaban

Edoxaban 30 mg tablets for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Warfarin

Warfarin tablet, 1.0 or 2.5 mg, for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Enoxaparin

Enoxaparin per label, at prescribed dose until PT INR at least 2.0

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has signed informed consent
* Is older than minimum legal adult age (country specific)
* Has had ongoing AF lasting at least 48 hrs but \<= 12 months (with or without valvular heart disease)
* Has treatment plan that includes for electrical cardioversion
* Has NVAF or other specific valvular heart diseases (eg, mitral valve prolapse, mitral valve regurgitation, and aortic valve disease)

Exclusion Criteria

* Has AF that is transient or reversible
* Has contraindicated condition, ie, conditions considered to be formal indication for conventional anticoagulation
* Has a history of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure
* Has a known thrombus in LAA, the left atrial, left ventricle or aorta - or an intracardial mass
* Has had myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the past 30 days
* Has any contraindication to anticoagulant agents
* Has had protocol-defined signs of bleeding or conditions associated with high risk of bleeding that would preclude participation
* Is receiving, or plans to receive during the study period, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or invasive procedures (other than routine endoscopy) in which bleeding would be anticipated
* Has received prohibited concomitant medication or therapy
* Has had protocol-defined signs of bleeding or high
* Has inadequate liver, kidney, and blood test results
* Received any investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or plans to during the study period
* Has reproductive potential and does not agree to take proper contraceptive measures
* Has active cancer requiring chemotherapy/radiation/major surgery within the next 3 months
* Has significant active concurrent medical illness or infection or life expectancy less than 6 months
* In the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the protocol or complete the study, has had drug or alcohol dependence within the past year, or has any other condition that might place the participant at increased risk of harm
* Is a participant in the United States after January 2015 with creatinine clearance (CrCL) greater than 95 mL/minute
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rockledge, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Auburn, Maine, United States

Site Status

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Butler, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Mödling, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Huy, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Mechelen, , Belgium

Site Status

Tienen, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Burgas, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Gabrovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pazardzhik, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Stara Zagora, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Český Krumlov, , Czechia

Site Status

Havlíčkův Brod, , Czechia

Site Status

Hodonín, , Czechia

Site Status

Kolín, , Czechia

Site Status

Kroměříž, , Czechia

Site Status

Náchod, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Příbram, , Czechia

Site Status

Slaný, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

First site in

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Second site in

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status

Hellerup, , Denmark

Site Status

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Holbæk, , Denmark

Site Status

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Slagelse, , Denmark

Site Status

Svendborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Bron, , France

Site Status

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montfermeil, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Coburg, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Giessen, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Bad Friedrichshall

Heilbronn, , Germany

Site Status

Langen, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Ludwigsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Paderborn, , Germany

Site Status

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

First site in

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Second site in

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Cegléd, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Hódmezővásárhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Nagykanizsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Ashkelon, , Israel

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy

Site Status

Santa Maria Capua Vetere, CE, Italy

Site Status

Mestre, VE, Italy

Site Status

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Chieti, , Italy

Site Status

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

First site in

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Second site in

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Trieste, , Italy

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hilversum, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leeuwarden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Venlo, , Netherlands

Site Status

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Puławy, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Oradea, Bihor County, Romania

Site Status

Craiova, Dolj, Romania

Site Status

Focşani, Vrancea, Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Brăila, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Piteşti, , Romania

Site Status

Târgovişte, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Salt, Girona, Spain

Site Status

Almería, , Spain

Site Status

First site in

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Second site in

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

First site in

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Second site in

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Third site in

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Ourense, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Vigo, , Spain

Site Status

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Romford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Barnet, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Basildon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bradford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chertsey, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Doncaster, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Harrow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Llanelli, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Luton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Newport, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Bulgaria Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Netherlands Poland Romania Russia Spain Sweden Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, Waldo AL, Ezekowitz MD, Weitz JI, Spinar J, Ruzyllo W, Ruda M, Koretsune Y, Betcher J, Shi M, Grip LT, Patel SP, Patel I, Hanyok JJ, Mercuri M, Antman EM; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24251359 (View on PubMed)

Goette A, Kwong WJ, Ezekowitz MD, Banach M, Hjortshoj SP, Zamoryakhin D, Lip GYH. Edoxaban therapy increases treatment satisfaction and reduces utilization of healthcare resources: an analysis from the EdoxabaN vs. warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) study. Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1936-1943. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy141.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29947751 (View on PubMed)

Goette A, Merino JL, Ezekowitz MD, Zamoryakhin D, Melino M, Jin J, Mercuri MF, Grosso MA, Fernandez V, Al-Saady N, Pelekh N, Merkely B, Zenin S, Kushnir M, Spinar J, Batushkin V, de Groot JR, Lip GY; ENSURE-AF investigators. Edoxaban versus enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):1995-2003. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31474-X. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27590218 (View on PubMed)

Lip GY, Merino J, Ezekowitz M, Ellenbogen K, Zamoryakhin D, Lanz H, Jin J, Al-Saadi N, Mercuri M, Goette A. A prospective evaluation of edoxaban compared to warfarin in subjects undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: The EdoxabaN vs. warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of Atrial Fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) study. Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):597-604.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25965706 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-003148-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DU176b-F-E308

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.