Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Warfarin and Dabigatran

NCT ID: NCT03254134

Last Updated: 2019-07-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

22490 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-20

Study Completion Date

2017-11-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non0-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a comparative effectiveness and safety study of clinical events among patients taking either dabigatran or warfarin. There is no formal hypothesis to be tested, but rather to provide the estimates on the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism (effectiveness) and bleeding events (safety) using 95% confidence interval for comparison between those non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking dabigatran vs. warfarin using a large, nation-wide claims data in Japan.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Atrial Fibrillation

patients with atrial fibrillation

Warfarin

Intervention Type DRUG

patients treated with warfarin

Dabigatran

Intervention Type DRUG

patients treated with Dabigatran

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Warfarin

patients treated with warfarin

Intervention Type DRUG

Dabigatran

patients treated with Dabigatran

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PRADAXA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged \>18 year-old with confirmed diagnosis of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) (ICD 10 code I48)
* having a first prescription (index date) of either dabigatran or warfarin between 14 March 2011 to 30 June 2016
* having no prescription of any Oral Anticoagulants (OACs) for 12 months prior to the index date (this period is defined as the baseline period)

Exclusion Criteria

* patients having less than 12 months of enrolment prior to the index date
* being dialysis or kidney transplant recipients in baseline period
* having either atrial flutter, valvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
* mechanical valve placement, rheumatic AF
* and/or mitral valve prolapse/regurge/stenosis in baseline period
* having record of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism \< 6 months before AF diagnosis in baseline period
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boehringer Ingelheim

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1160-0288

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Medical Need of OAC Reversal
NCT03254147 COMPLETED