Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Subjects Who Present to the Emergency Department With Acute Coronary Syndrome (RESCUE)

NCT ID: NCT00077818

Last Updated: 2009-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED). Efficacy is assessed by using a composite score consisting of 30-day all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent angina requiring revascularization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Enoxaparin sodium

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Rest angina lasting at least 10 minutes that is highly suggestive of myocardial ischemia and is not explained by trauma or obvious abnormalities on chest x-ray, occurring within 24 hours of randomization;
* TIMI risk score greater than or equal to 4 (a qualitative test for CK-MB or Troponin may be utilized for screening purposes; however, a quantitative test must still be performed.)

Exclusion Criteria

* Increased bleeding risk as defined by any of the following:

* Ischemic stroke within the last year
* Any previous hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial tumor, or intracranial aneurysm
* Recent (\<1 month) trauma or major surgery (including bypass surgery)
* Active bleeding (other than minor skin abrasions)
* Impaired hemostasis including any one of the following:

* Known International Normalized Ratio (INR) \>1.5
* Past or present bleeding disorder (including congenital bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia, acquired bleeding disorders, and unexplained clinically significant bleeding disorders)
* Known or history of thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<100,000/mL)
* History of thrombocytopenia with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, heparin, or enoxaparin
* Angina from a secondary cause such as:

* severe, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180 mm Hg despite treatment)
* anemia
* valvular disease
* congenital heart disease
* hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy
* thyrotoxicosis.
* Bundle branch block not known to be old in the context of angina.
* Undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the past 24 hours.
* A known allergy to heparin, low molecular weight heparin, pork or pork products.
* Any contraindications to treatment with UFH or LMWH.
* A recent (\<48 hours) or planned spinal/epidural anesthesia or puncture.
* Thrombolytic therapy within the preceding 24 hours.
* Any other clinically relevant serious diseases, including severe liver disease or renal failure \[creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min\], rendering implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult.
* Treatment with other investigational agents or devices within the previous 30 days, planned use of investigational drugs or devices, or has previously enrolled in this trial.
* Inability to comply with the protocol (e.g., has uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits).
* Inability to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study or is otherwise unable to provide informed consent.
* A prosthetic heart valve
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

sanofi-aventis

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luc Sagnard

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sanofi

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XRP4563B_4001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.