Assessment of Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients

NCT ID: NCT01682707

Last Updated: 2012-09-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2010-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes.

In this study the investigators selected two techniques commonly used for intubation, laryngoscopy and track light, so the investigators can verify which intubation techniques provides less hemodynamic changes in coronary patients under standard anesthesia induction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Disease Undergoing CABG

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

intubation coronary disease hemodynamic response anesthesia with tracheal intubation assessment of hemodynamic response

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laryngoscopy

Laryngoscopy Track Light teaqueal intubation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

laryngoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

tracheal intubation with two different techniques, track light and laryngoscopy.

Track Light

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

track light

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laryngoscopy

tracheal intubation with two different techniques, track light and laryngoscopy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

track light

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

rigidy laryngoscopy,

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* coronary disease ASA 2 e 3 using beta-blockers

Exclusion Criteria

* emergency surgery arrythmia other antiarrythmic drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Juiz de Fora

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marcello F Salgado Filho, MD

Master

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcello F Salgado filho, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Juiz de Fora

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institute of Cardiology / Ministry of Health

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nishiyama T, Misawa K, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Effects of combining midazolam and barbiturate on the response to tracheal intubation: changes in autonomic nervous system. J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):344-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00370-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12208438 (View on PubMed)

Nora FS, Klipel R, Ayala G, Oliveira Filho GR. [Remifentanil: does the infusion regimen make a difference in the prevention of hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation?]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2007 Jun;57(3):247-60. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942007000300003. Portuguese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19466360 (View on PubMed)

Almeida MC, Martins RS, Martins AL. [Tracheal intubation conditions at 60 seconds in children, adults and elderly patients.]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004 Apr;54(2):204-11. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942004000200007. Portuguese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19471727 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.sba.com.br

Sociedade brasileira de Anestesiologia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE-0021.0.185.000-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id