Use of Ultrasonography to Determine Fluid-responsiveness for Shock in a Population of Intensive Care Unit Patients
NCT ID: NCT01680770
Last Updated: 2025-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
124 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-06-30
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: There will be a significant difference in the inferior vena cava respiratory variation and subclavian vein respiratory variation between responders and non-responders to intravenous fluid challenge in a broad population of patients with shock.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Integrated Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound on Clinical Outcome of Shocked Patients in Intensive Care Unit
NCT06295445
The CCUS Based Characteristic of Hemodynamic and Lung Pathology in Early Stage of Shock in ICU: The Epidemic and Prognostic Value
NCT03082326
Critical Care Ultrasound Oriented Shock Treatment in ICU
NCT03093987
Fluid Responsiveness Predicted by PtcO2 in Critically Ill Patients
NCT02083757
Reliability of Respiratory Variability of Maximal Aortic Blood Flow Velocity Obtained by Ultrasonography-doppler in Patients Followed Up with a Diagnosis of Shock in Intensive Care Unit for Evaluating Fluid Responsiveness in Patients
NCT06845280
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A number of studies have attempted to determine predictors of volume-responsiveness through various methods, including the use of ultrasonography performed by intensivists, anesthesiologists and emergency medicine physicians. The currently published studies establish predictors of fluid-responsiveness in their populations. However, there has been large variability in the study designs, making it difficult to compare different modalities.
The objective of our study is to determine the correlation of transthoracic ultrasonographic indices of fluid responsiveness to changes in direct measures of cardiac output and to compare them to other established predictors of fluid responsiveness such as central venous pressure variation, systolic arterial pressure variation and pulse pressure variation. Furthermore, we wish to include a broad range of patients with different types of shock in order to determine the generalized applicability of these indices. Additionally, reported success of intensivist-obtained echocardiographic images varies widely in the literature, but most studies do not report which views are most accessible. We plan to study prospectively which views are obtainable and correlate them to patient characteristics.
This would potentially establish echocardiography by an intensivist as a widely applicable, non-invasive, and easily accessible method for determining fluid-responsiveness in a patient with shock. Achievement of this goal would allow clinicians to quickly identify those patients that would respond to fluids and at the same time minimize the administration of fluids to those in whom it is unlikely to benefit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hypotensive patients in shock
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Decision by clinicians to give intravenous fluids for volume expansion.
3. Decision by clinicians to obtain central venous access.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with terminal conditions in whom aggressive care will not be pursued.
3. Patients with a history of left bundle branch block.
4. Patients will not be excluded on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kress P John, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-566B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.